Use of Noncontrast Computed Tomography of the Inferior Vena Cava for Real-Time Imaging Guidance for the Placement of Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Abstract

Appropriate placement of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter necessitates imaging of the renal veins because when an IVC filter is deployed its tip should be at or below the inferior aspect of the inferiormost renal vein. Traditionally, imaging during placement of IVC filters has been with conventional cavography and fluoroscopy. Recently, intravascular ultrasound has been used for the same purpose but with additional expense. Morbidly obese patients often exceed the weight limit of fluoroscopy tables. In addition, short obese patients are at risk of falling from narrow fluoroscopy tables. For such patients, computed tomography (CT) guidance is a viable alternative to conventional fluoroscopic guidance.

IVC placement was performed in the CT suite for two obese patients who exceeded the weight limits of the available fluoroscopy tables. In one case, a Vena-Tech filter (Braun Medical, Melsungen, Germany) was placed using CT fluoroscopy. In the second case, a Recovery (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) filter was placed using intermittent limited z-axis scanning.

In the first case, the filter was placed below the level of the renal veins and above the confluence of the iliac veins, which is acceptable placement. In the second case, with refinement of technique, the filter tip was placed less than 1 cm below the inferiormost renal vein, which is considered optimal placement.

CT of the IVC precisely images the renal veins and can characterize their number and their confluence with the IVC. CT guidance is a viable alternative to fluoroscopic guidance for the placement of IVC filters in morbidly obese patients.

Keywords

inferior vena cava - computed tomography - filterplacementguidance - deep vein thrombosis - obesity

• References

• 1 Kaufman JA. Inferior vena cava and tributaries. In: Kaufman JA, Lee MJ, , eds. Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2004: 350-376
• 2 Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, Elkins RC. A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery 1973; 73 (4) 599-606
• 3 Tadavarthy SM, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Salomonowitz E , et al. Kimray-Greenfield vena cava filter: percutaneous introduction. Radiology 1984; 151 (2) 525-526
• 4 Vesco PA, Falimirski ME, Williams HK, Rodriguez A, Young J. Abdominal computed tomography and the placement of inferior vena caval filters. J Trauma 2006; 60 (6) 1197-1201 , discussion 1202–1203
• 5 Powell JT, Mink JT, Nomura JT , et al. Ultrasound-guidance can reduce adverse events during femoral central venous cannulation. J Emerg Med 2014; 46 (4) 519-524
• 6 Jaskolka JD, Kwok RP, Gray SH, Mojibian HR. The value of preprocedure computed tomography for planning insertion of inferior vena cava filters. Can AssocRadiol J 2010; 61 (4) 223-229
• 7 Ignotus P, Wetton C, Berry J. CT fluoroscopic guided insertion of inferior vena cava filters. Br J Radiol 2006; 79 (939) 258-260
• 8 Hislop S, Fanciullo D, Doyle A, Ellis J, Chandra A, Gillespie DL. Correlation of intravascular ultrasound and computed tomography scan measurements for placement of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filters. J VascSurg 2014; 59 (4) 1066-1072