Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2016; 35(03): 110-113
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1616363
Telemedizin
Schattauer GmbH

Management von komplexen neurovaskulären Interventionen mithilfe eines telemedizinischen Netzwerks

Management of complex neurovascular interventions with the aid of a telestroke network
C. Adamczyk
1   Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München
,
K. Hüttemann
1   Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München
,
R. Müller
2   Klinik für Neurologie und Neurologische Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Bezirkskliniken Schwaben, Günzburg
,
R. Dabitz
3   Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Ingolstadt
,
L. Fuhry
3   Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Ingolstadt
,
H. Janssen
4   Abteilung für Neuroradiologie des Klinikums der Universität München
,
B. Widder
2   Klinik für Neurologie und Neurologische Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Bezirkskliniken Schwaben, Günzburg
,
M. Dieterich
1   Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München
,
T. Pfefferkorn
3   Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Ingolstadt
,
G. F. Hamann
2   Klinik für Neurologie und Neurologische Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Bezirkskliniken Schwaben, Günzburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingegangen am: 19 November 2015

angenommen am: 25 November 2015

Publication Date:
10 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Forderung nach einem flächendeckenden Zugang zur endovaskulären mechanischen Thrombektomie stellt die telemedizinischen Schlaganfallnetzwerke vor eine neue Herausforderung. NEVAS, das neurovaskuläre Versorgungsnetzwerk für Südwestbayern, ist so strukturiert, dass neben den klassischen Leistungen eines telemedizinischen Schlaganfallnetzwerkes auch moderne Interventionsverfahren besser in die Versorgung verankert werden. NEVAS unterscheidet sich von anderen telemedizinischen Netzwerken durch eine regionale Organisation der Kooperations- und Zentrumskliniken, eine bedarfsorientierte Nutzung der Telemedizin, eine obligate Gefäßdarstellung mittels Schnittbildverfahren im Rahmen der primären Notfalldiagnostik und die Definition sowie Etablierung individueller Verlegungs- und Behandlungsabläufe für jeden Standort. NEVAS kann als Blaupause dienen, wie moderne Schlaganfallversorgung ubiquitär verfügbar gemacht werden kann.

Summary

The demand for an area-covering supply system for endovascular stent thrombectomy is a new challenge in the organisation of telestroke networks. NEVAS, the neurovascular supply network for South-West-Bavaria, offers the classical accomplishments of telestroke networks and makes additionally the state of the art stroke care in the whole supply area available. NEVAS differs from other telestroke networks in its regional organisation of cooperation clinics and center clinics; requirement-based usage of telemedicine resources; obligatory vascular imaging by using split-image procedure in the primary ER diagnostic; definition and establishment of individual standard operational procedures for treatment and transporting at each cooperation clinic. NEVAS can be used as a blueprint for making modern stroke care ubiquitously available.

Schlüsselwörter

NEVAS - neurovaskuläre Maximalversorgung - endovaskuläre mechanische Thrombektomie - telemedizinisches Schlaganfallnetzwerk

Keywords

NEVAS - state of the art stroke care - endovascular stent thrombectomy - telestroke network
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Campbell BC. et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1009-18.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goyal M. et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1019-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Saver JL. et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2285-95.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Berkhemer OA. et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (01) 11-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jovin TG. et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2296-306.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Furlan AJ. Endovascular therapy for stroke – it’s about time. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2347-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Campbell BC. et al. Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the new standard of care for large vessel ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14 (08) 846-54.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wiborg A, Widder B. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas: The Telemedicine in Stroke in Swabia (TESS) Project. Stroke 2003; 34 (12) 2951-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Audebert HJ. et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke 2005; 36 (02) 287-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Audebert HJ. et al. (Telemedicine in acute stroke care: current status and developments). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2007; 132 (09) 431-6.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schwab S. et al. Long-term outcome after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology 2007; 69 (09) 898-903.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Audebert HJ. et al. Long-term effects of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support in community hospitals on behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Stroke 2009; 40 (03) 902-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Muller-Barna P. et al. TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke 2014; 45 (09) 2739-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bladin CF, Cadilhac DA. Effect of telestroke on emergent stroke care and stroke outcomes. Stroke 2014; 45 (06) 1876-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Landwehr P. et al. DeGIR/DGNR-Modul- und Stufenkonzept. 2015 www.degir.de/site/degir-dgnr-modul-und-stufenkonzept
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Handschu R. et al. Use of a telestroke service for evaluation of non-stroke neurological cases. J Neurol 2015; 262 (05) 1266-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Audebert HJ. et al. Acceptance of telemedicine for acute stroke care. The German project TEMPiS. Nervenarzt 2009; 80 (02) 184-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Audebert HJ. et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5 (09) 742-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Busse O. et al. Interdisciplinary neurovascular network: A new structure for treatment of stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases in Germany. Nerven arzt 2013; 84 (10) 1228-32.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Widder B. 10 Jahre Teleneurologie in Deutschland – eine kritische Analyse. Akt Neurol 2011; 38 (02) 91-95.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Conroy MB. et al. Helicopter transfer offers a potential benefit to patients with acute stroke. Stroke 1999; 30 (12) 2580-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hesselfeldt R. et al. Is air transport of stroke patients faster than ground transport? A prospective controlled observational study. Emerg Med J 2014; 31 (04) 268-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Thomas SH. et al. The evolving role of helicopter emergency medical services in the transfer of stroke patients to specialized centers. Prehosp Emerg Care 2002; 6 (02) 210-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Silliman S. et al. Use of a field-to-stroke center helicopter transport program to extend thrombolytic therapy to rural residents. Stroke 2003; 34 (03) 729-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Reiner-Deitemyer V. et al. Helicopter transport of stroke patients and its influence on thrombolysis rates: data from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Stroke 2011; 42 (05) 1295-300.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Olson MD, Rabinstein AA. Does helicopter emergency medical service transfer offer benefit to patients with stroke?. Stroke 2012; 43 (03) 878-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar