Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(03): 193-198
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-08-0127
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

A comparison of anatomical lateral distal femoral angles obtained with four femoral axis methods in canine femora

J. E. Miles
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
,
M. Mortensen
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
,
E. L. Svalastoga
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
,
T. Eriksen
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:20 August 2014

Accepted:11 March 2015

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To report the repeatability and reproducibility of four different anatomical proximal femoral axis (a-PFA) methods for measuring anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (a-LDFA), and to compare a-LDFA values produced by each method at three different femoral elevation angles.

Methods: Digital radiographs were obtained of seven dry canine femora at 0°, 12.5° and 25° elevations. Using image analysis software, landmarks defining four different a-PFA and the condylar axis were identified by two independent observers on two separate occasions. Corresponding a-LDFA were calculated for each femur, elevation and a-PFA. Repeatability and reproducibility parameters were calculated and compared statistically, along with the effect of technique and elevation on a-LDFA value.

Results: Interobserver repeatability coefficients were subjectively better for three of the a-PFA methods at 2° compared to the fourth at 3.1°. Median a-LDFA increased significantly (p 0.002) with increasing femoral elevation for all a-PFA methods, with a median increase of 3.3°. The median difference in a-LDFA between a-PFA methods yielding the highest and lowest measurements was 2.6° over all three elevations.

Clinical significance: The combined effects of a-PFA choice, femoral elevation and measurement reproducibility may produce typical errors of ± 2.6°, which could have implications for the selection of candidates for corrective osteotomies. Clinicians need to be aware that values obtained with one method and femoral elevation may not be equivalent to values obtained with other methods or elevations.

Keywords

Femur - varus - radiography - reliability - canine
 

  • References

  • 1 Piermattei DL. The stifle joint. In Piermattei DL, Flo GF, Decamp CE. editors Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4 ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 562-632.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Swiderski JK, Palmer RH. Long-term outcome of distal femoral osteotomy for treatment of combined distal femoral varus and medial patellar luxation: 12 cases (1999-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1070-1075.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Roch SP, Gemmill TJ. Treatment of medial patellar luxation by femoral closing wedge ostectomy using a distal femoral plate in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 152-158.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Swiderski JK, Radecki SV, Park RD. et al. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic femoral varus angle measurements in normal dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 43-48.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dudley RM, Kowaleski MP, Drost WT. et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 546-552.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tomlinson J, Fox D, Cook JL. et al. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 593-598.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jackson GM, Wendelburg KL. Evaluation of the effect of distal femoral elevation on radiographic measurement of the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 994-1001.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Palmer RH, Ikuta CL, Cadmus JM. Comparison of femoral angulation measurement between radiographs and anatomic specimens across a broad range of varus conformations. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 1023-1028.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rumph PF, Hathcock JT. A symmetric axis-based method for measuring the projected femoral angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 328-333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limbs of Labrador Retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70: 498-507.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998; 7: 301-317.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Oxley B, Gemmill TJ, Pink J. et al. Precision of a novel computed tomographic method for quantification of femoral varus in dogs and an assessment of the effect of femoral malpositioning. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 751-758.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med 1994; 13: 2465-2476.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar