Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in dental practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study

Background and Aims: A base for targeted research development in dental homeopathy can be founded on systematic collection and analysis of relevant data obtained by dentists in clinical practice. With these longer-term aims in mind, we conducted a pilot data collection study, in which 14 homeopathic dentists collected clinical and outcome data over a 6-month period in their practice setting.

Methods: A specifically designed Excel spreadsheet enabled recording of consecutive dental appointments under the following main headings: date; patient identity (anonymised), age and gender; dental condition/complaint treated; whether chronic or acute, new or follow-up case; patient-assessed outcome (7-point Likert scale: −3 to +3) compared with first appointment; homeopathic medicine/s prescribed; whether any other medication/s being taken for the condition. Spreadsheets were submitted monthly via e-mail to the project co-ordinator for data synthesis and analysis.

Results: Practitioners typically submitted data regularly and punctually, and most data cells were completed as required, enabling substantial data analysis. The mean age of patients was 46.2 years. A total of 726 individual patient conditions were treated overall. There was opportunity to follow-up 496 individual cases (positive outcome in 90.1%; negative in 1.8%; no change in 7.9%; outcome not recorded in 0.2%). Sixty-four of these 496 patients reported their outcome assessment before the end of the homeopathic appointment. Strongly positive outcomes (scores of +2 or +3) were achieved most notably in the frequently treated conditions of pericoronitis, periodontal abscess, periodontal infection, reversible pulpitis, sensitive cementum, and toothache with decay.

Conclusions: This multi-practitioner pilot study has indicated that systematic recording of practice data in dental homeopathy is both feasible and capable of informing future research. A refined version of the spreadsheet can be employed in larger-scale research-targeted data collection in the dental practice setting.

Keywords

systematic data collection - homeopathic dentists - clinical outcomes - research targeting

• References

• 1 Bhat S.S., Sargod S.S., George D. Dentistry and homeopathy: an overview. Dent Update 2005; 32: 486-491.
• 2 Albertini H., Goldberg W., Sanguy B.B., Toulza C. Homeopathic treatment of dental neuralgia using Arnica and Hypericum: a summary of 60 observations. J Am Inst Hom 1985; 78: 126-128.
• 3 Kaziro G. Metronidazole (Flagyl) and Arnica montana in the prevention of post-surgical complications, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 42-49.
• 4 Lökken P., Straumsheim P.A., Tveiten D., Skjelbred P., Borchgrevink C.F. Effect of homoeopathy on pain and other events after acute trauma; Placebo controlled trial with bilateral oral surgery. Br Med J 1995; 310: 1439-1442.
• 5 Haila S., Koskinen A., Tenovuo J. Effects of homeopathic treatment on salivary flow rate and subjective symptoms in patients with oral dryness: a randomized trial. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 175-181.
• 6 White A., Ernst E. The case for uncontrolled clinical trials: a starting point for the evidence base for CAM. Complement Ther Med 2001; 9: 111-115.
• 7 Walach H., Jonas W.B., Lewith G.T. The role of outcomes research in evaluating complementary and alternative medicine. Altern Ther Health Med 2002; 8: 88-95.
• 8 Bell I. Evidence-based homeopathy: empirical questions and methodological considerations for homeopathic research. Am J Hom Med 2003; 96: 17-31.
• 9 Mathie R.T. Clinical outcomes research: contributions to the evidence-base for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 56-57.
• 10 Mathie R.T., Robinson T.W. Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in medical practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 199-205.
• 11 Mathie R.T., Hansen L., Elliott M.F., Hoare J. Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in veterinary practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 27-34.
• 12 Feldhaus H-W. Cost-effectiveness of homoeopathic treatment in a dental practice. Br Hom J 1993; 82: 22-28.
• 13 Robinson T.W. Responses to homeopathic treatment in National Health Service general practice. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 9-14.
• 14 Spence D.S., Thompson E.A., Barron S.J. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, university-hospital outpatient observational study. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11: 793-798.
• 15 Gordon S., Ameen V., Bagby B., Shahan B., Jhingran P., Carter E. Validation of irritable bowel syndrome Global Improvement Scale: an integrated symptom end point for assessing treatment efficacy. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 1317-1323.
• 16 Clover A. Patient benefit survey: Tunbridge Wells Homoeopathic Hospital. Br Hom J 2000; 89: 68-72.
• 17 Mercer S.W., Reilly D., Watt G.C. The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52: 901-905.