Validity of Using Velocity to Estimate Intensity in Resistance Exercises in Men and Women

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the validity of using bar velocity to estimate relative load in squat and bench-press exercises for both young men and women. Twenty-five men and 25 women performed a progressive loading test up to 1-RM in the squat and bench-press exercises, which were repeated after 2-weeks. Relationships between mean propulsive velocity and%1-RM were analysed. A second-order polynomial equation for predicting the corresponding velocity of each percentage of 1-RM was developed for men (validation). This equation was then applied in women (cross-validation). Moreover, a specific equation for women was developed (validation) and was also applied in a sub-sample of women (cross-validation). Close relationships (R²: 0.91–0.95) between bar velocity and relative load were observed in both sexes for squat and bench press. Men’s equation applied to women showed a high level of agreement, although lower bias and higher level of agreement was observed when a sex-specific equation was applied in women, both validation and cross-validation samples. In conclusion, lifting velocity can be used to accurately prescribe the relative load regardless of sex in both upper-body and lower-body exercises, although when estimating load from velocity measures it will be necessary to use the sex-specific equation for each exercise.

Key words

loading intensity - velocity-based training - maximal strength - one-repetition maximum - athletic performance - gender

Publication History

Received: 19 November 2019

Accepted: 21 April 2020

Article published online:
20 July 2020

• References

• 1 Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR. et al. The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations. Sports Med 2018; 48: 765-785
• 2 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 674-688
• 3 Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Med 2004; 34: 663-679
• 4 Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: A review of the acute programme variables. Sports Med 2005; 35: 841-851
• 5 Buckner SL, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT. et al. Determining strength: A case for multiple methods of measurement. Sports Med 2017; 47: 193-195
• 6 Scott BR, Duthie GM, Thornton HR. et al. Training monitoring for resistance exercise: Theory and applications. Sports Med 2016; 46: 687-698
• 7 Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Marques MC, Sanchez-Medina L. The importance of movement velocity as a measure to control resistance training intensity. J Hum Kinet 2011; 29A: 15-19
• 8 Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Sanchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 347-352
• 9 Loturco I, Pereira LA, Cal Abad CC. et al. Using bar velocity to predict the maximum dynamic strength in the half-squat exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2016; 11: 697-700
• 10 Chapman PP, Whitehead JR, Binkert RH. The 225–1b reps-to-fatigue test as a submaximal estimate of 1-rm bench press performance in college football players. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12: 258-261
• 11 Niewiadomski W, Laskowska D, Gąsiorowska A. et al. Determination and prediction of one repetition maximum (1RM): Safety considerations. J Hum kinet 2008; 19: 109-120
• 12 Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Perez CE. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 209-216
• 13 Sanchez-Moreno M, Rodriguez-Rosell D, Pareja-Blanco F. et al. Movement velocity as indicator of relative intensity and level of effort attained during the set in pull-up exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 1378-1384
• 14 Munoz-Lopez M, Marchante D, Cano-Ruiz MA. et al. Load-, force-, and power-velocity relationships in the prone pull-up exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 1249-1255
• 15 Conceicao F, Fernandes J, Lewis M. et al. Movement velocity as a measure of exercise intensity in three lower limb exercises. J Sports Sci 2016; 34: 1099-1106
• 16 de Hoyo M, Nunez FJ, Sanudo B. et al. Predicting loading intensity measuring velocity in barbell hip thrust exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2019; [Epub Ahead of Print]
• 17 Sánchez-Medina L, Pallarés JG, Pérez CE. et al. Estimation of relative load from bar velocity in the full back squat exercise. Sports Med Int Open 2017; 01: E80-E88
• 18 Martinez-Cava A, Moran-Navarro R, Sanchez-Medina L. et al. Velocity- and power-load relationships in the half, parallel and full back squat. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 1088-1096
• 19 Balsalobre-Fernández C, García-Ramos A, Jiménez-Reyes P. Load–velocity profiling in the military press exercise: Effects of gender and training. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2018; 13: 743-750
• 20 Torrejón A, Balsalobre-Fernández C, Haff GG. et al. The load-velocity profile differs more between men and women than between individuals with different strength levels. Sports Biomech 2019; 18: 245-255
• 21 García-Ramos A, Suzovic D, Pérez-Castilla A. The load-velocity profiles of three upper-body pushing exercises in men and women. Sports Biomech 2019; [Epub Ahead of Print]
• 22 Pestana-Melero FL, Haff GG, Rojas FJ. et al. Reliability of the load-velocity relationship obtained through linear and polynomial regression models to predict the 1-repetition maximum load. J Appl Biomech 2018; 34: 184-190
• 23 Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load-velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 1897-1904
• 24 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238
• 25 Lin L, Hedayat AS, Sinha B. et al. statistical methods in assessing agreement. J Am Stat Assoc 2002; 97: 257-270
• 26 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
• 27 Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 123-129
• 28 Jidovtseff B, Croisier J, Scimar N. et al. The ability of isoinertial assessment to monitor specific training effects. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2008; 48: 55-64
• 29 Haff GG, Triplett NT. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 4^th ed. Champaign,IL: Human Kinetics;; 2015
• 30 Pallares JG, Sanchez-Medina L, Perez CE. et al. Imposing a pause between the eccentric and concentric phases increases the reliability of isoinertial strength assessments. J Sports Sci 2014; 32: 1165-1175
• 31 Sanchez-Medina L, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1725-1734
• 32 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155-163
• 33 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
• 34 Stokes M. Reliability and repeatability of methods for measuring muscle in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Practice 1985; 1: 71-76
• 35 Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiment. New York: John Wiley Sons; 1987
• 36 Nimphius S. Exercise and sport science failing by design in understanding female athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; [Epub Ahead of Print]
• 37 Siff M. Supertraining. 5^th ed. Denver: Supertraining Institute;; 2000
• 38 Garcia-Ramos A, Ulloa-Diaz D, Barboza-Gonzalez P. et al. Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0212085