Die Wirkung unserer Hände – Chad E. Cook über die Manuelle Therapie

Chad E. Cook

doi:10.1055/a-1227-0712

physiopraxis, Inhaltsverzeichnis

physiopraxis 2020; 18(11/12): 22-27
DOI: 10.1055/a-1227-0712

Therapie

Die Wirkung unserer Hände – Chad E. Cook über die Manuelle Therapie

Authors

Chad E. Cook∗

Abstract

Hinter der Manuellen Therapie stehen seit jeher zahlreiche philosophische Ansätze. Heute nimmt man an, dass sie insbesondere bei schmerzadaptiven Patienten wirkt, die das eigene Schmerzempfinden selbst modulieren können. Der Artikel erörtert die Evidenz in Bezug auf Manuelle Therapie und liefert theoretische Begründungen für die Veränderungen, die man im klinischen Umfeld bei Patienten beobachtet.

Volltext

Referenzen

Literaturverzeichnis
1 Cimmino MA, Ferrone C, Cutolo M. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011; 25: 173-183
2 Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M. et al The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020
3 Bishop MD, Torres-Cueco R, Gay CW. et al What effect can manual therapy have on a patient’s pain experience?. Pain Manag 2015; 5: 455-464
4 Low LA. The impact of pain upon cognition: what have rodent studies told us?. PAIN 2013; 154: 2603-2605
5 (No Author). A Guide to Disability Rights Laws. Available at. https://www.ada.gov/cguide.htm
6 (No Author). Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health. Available at. http://bjdonline.org/musculoskeletal-conditions-the-second-greatest-cause-of-disability-2/
7 (No author) Musculoskeletal Conditions. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions
8 Turner JA, Franklin G, Heagerty PJ. et al The association between pain and disability. Pain 2004; 112: 307-314
9 Serbic D, Pincus T. The relationship between pain, disability, guilt and acceptance in low back pain: a mediation analysis. J Behav Med 2017; 40: 651-658
10 Finnern MM, Kleinböhl D, Flor H. et al Differential sensory and clinical phenotypes of patients with chronic widespread and regional musculoskeletal pain. Pain 2020
11 Rethorn ZD, Cook C, Reneker JC. Social Determinants of Health: If You Aren’t Measuring Them, You Aren’t Seeing the Big Picture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49: 872-874
12 Scholl L, Seth P, Kariisa M. et al Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67: 1419-1427
13 (no author) OMPT definition Available at https://www.ifompt.org/About+IFOMPT/OMPT+Definition.html
14 Vigotsky AD, Bruhns RP. The Role of Descending Modulation in Manual Therapy and Its Analgesic Implications: A Narrative Review. Pain Res Treat 2015; 2015: 292805
15 Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, George SZ. et al Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?. J Man ManipTher 2011; 19: 11-19
16 Araujo FX, Ferreira GE, Angellos RF. et al Autonomic Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Manipulative PhysiolTher 2019; 42: 623-634
17 Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M. et al Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2019; 364: l689
18 Cook C. Orthopedic Manual Therapy: An Evidence Based Approach. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River NJ; Prentice Hall: 2012
19 McClure P, Flowers K. Treatment of limited should motion: A case study based on biomechanical considerations. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 929-936
20 Baeyens J, Van Roy P, De Schepper A. et al Glenohumeral joint kinematics related to minor anterior instability of the shoulder at the end of the later preparatory phase of throwing. Clin Biomech 2001; 16: 752-757
21 Baeyens J, Van Roy P, Clarjjs J. Intra-articular kinematics of the normal glenohumeral joint in the late preparatory phase of throwing: Kaltenborn’s rule revisited. Ergonomics 2000; 10: 1726-1737
22 Franklin M, Conner-Kerr T, Chamness M. et al Assessment of exercise-induced minor muscle lesions: The accuracy of Cyriax’s diagnosis by selective tension paradigm. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 1996; 24: 122-129
23 Klässbo M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Larsson G. Examination of passive ROM and capsular patterns of the hip. Physiotherapy Res International 2003; 8: 1-12
24 Bijl D, Dekker J, van Baar M. et al Validity of Cyriax’s concept capsular pattern for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Scand J Rheumatol 1998; 27: 347-351
25 Peterson C, Hayes K. Construct validity of Cyriax’s selective tension examination: Association of end-feels with pain at the knee and shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000; 30: 512-521
26 Chesworth B, MacDermid J, Roth J. et al Movement diagram and “end-feel” reliability when measuring passive lateral rotation of the shoulder in patients with shoulder pathology. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 593-601
27 Sizer Jr PS, Brismée JM, Cook C. Coupling behavior of the thoracic spine: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative PhysiolTher 2007; 30: 390-399
28 Cook C, Hegedus E, Showalter C. et al Coupling behavior of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative PhysiolTher 2006; 29: 570-575
29 Cook C. Coupling Behavior of the Lumbar Spine: A Literature Review. J Man ManipTher 2003; 3: 137-145
30 Bjornsdottir S, Kumar S. Posteroanterior spinal mobilization: State of the art review and discussion. DisabilRehabil 1997; 19: 39-46
31 Matyas T, Bach T. The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics. Aust J Physiother 1985; 31: 175-199
32 Carty G. A comparison of the reliability of manual tests of compliance using accessory movements in peripheral and spinal joints. Abstract. Aust J Physiother 1986; 32: 68
33 Gibson H, Ross J, Alien J. et al The effect of mobilization on forward bending range. J Man ManipTher 1993; 1: 142-147
34 McCollam R, Benson C. Effects of poster–anterior mobilization on lumbar extension and flexion. J Man ManipTher 1993; 1: 134-141
35 Simmonds M, Kumar S, Lechelt E. Use of spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists’ tests of spinal motion. Phys Ther 1995; 75: 212-222
36 Ingraham, Paul. 2014 Spinal Nerve Roots Do Not Hook Up to Organs!. https://www.painscience.com/articles/spinal-nerves-and-organs.php Accessed November 26, 2018
37 Bellamy JJ. Legislative alchemy: The U.S. state chiropractic practice acts. Focus on Complementary and Alternative Therapies 2010; 15: 214-222
38 Kozij M. Psychosocial Assessment: A Pocket Guide for Data Collection. J Psychosocial Nursing & Mental Health Services 1989; 27: 41
39 Cook CE, O’Connell NE, Hall T. et al Benefits and Threats to Using Social Media for Presenting and Implementing Evidence. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48: 3-7
40 Hahne AJ, Keating JL, Wilson SC. Do within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion predict between-session changes in patients with low back pain?. Aust J Physiother 2004; 50: 17e23
41 Tuttle N. Do changes within a manual therapy treatment session predict betweensession changes for patients with cervical spine pain?. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51: 43e8
42 Tuttle N, Laasko L, Barrett R. Change in impairments in the first two treatments predicts outcome in impairments, but not in activity limitations, in subacute neck pain: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 2006; 52: 281e5
43 Tuttle N. Is it reasonable to use an individual patient’s progress after treatment as a guide to ongoing clinical reasoning?. J ManipPhysiolTher 2009; 32: 396e403
44 Cook C, Lawrence J, Michelik K. The value of a within and between session change in predicting changes in neck outcomes. J Man ManipTher 2014 (in press)
45 Cook C, Showalter C, Kabbaz V. et al Can a within/between session change in pain during reassessment predict outcome using a manual therapy intervention in patients with mechanical low back pain?. Man Ther 2012; 17: 325-329
46 Cook C, Petersen S, Donaldson M. et al Does early change predict long-term (6 months) improvements in subjects who receive manual therapy for low back pain?. Physiother Theory Pract 2017: 1-9
47 Donaldson M, Petersen S, Cook C. et al A Prescriptively Selected Nonthrust Manipulation Versus a Therapist-Selected Nonthrust Manipulation for Treatment of Individuals With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46: 243-250
48 Sutlive TG, Mabry LM, Easterling EJ. et al Comparison of short-term response to two spinal manipulation techniques for patients with low back pain in a military beneficiary population. Mil Med 2009; 174: 750-756
49 Schomacher J. The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Man ManipTher 2009; 17: 101-108
50 Aquino RL, Caires PM, Furtado FC. et al Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels does not Influence Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Man ManipTher 2009; 17: 95-100
51 Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J. et al Efficacy of "therapist-selected" versus "randomly selected" mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother 2003; 49: 233-241
52 de Oliveira RF, Costa LOP, Nascimento LP. et al Directed vertebral manipulation is not better than generic vertebral manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother 2020; 66: 174-179
53 Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD. et al A randomized controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent onset neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1313-1318
54 Cook C, Learman K, Showalter C. et al Early use of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust manipulation: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther 2013; 18: 191-198
55 Cook CE, George SZ, Keefe F. Different interventions, same outcomes? Here are four good reasons. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 951-952
56 Edwards RR, Dworkin RH, Turk DC. et al Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2016; 157: 1851-1871
57 Diatchenko L, Fillingim RB, Smith SB. et al The phenotypic and genetic signatures of common musculoskeletal pain conditions. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013; 9: 340-350
58 Selfe J, Janssen J, Callaghan M. et al Are there three main subgroups within the patellofemoral pain population? A detailed characterisation study of 127 patients to help develop targeted intervention (TIPPs). British Journal of Sports Medicine 2016; 50: 873-880
59 Mobasheri A, Saarakkala S, Finnilä M. et al Recent advances in understanding the phenotypes of osteoarthritis. F1000Res 2019; 8: F1000 Faculty Rev-2091
60 Craton N, Ali H, Lenoski S. COACH CV: The Seven Clinical Phenotypes of Concussion. Brain Sci 2017; 7: 119
61 George SZ, Parr JJ, Wallace MR. et al Inflammatory genes and psychological factors predict induced shoulder pain phenotype. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 1871-1881
62 Wan DWL, Arendt-Nielsen L, Wang K. et al Pain Adaptability in Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Is Not Associated With Conditioned Pain Modulation. J Pain 2018; 19: 897-909
63 Cook C, Learman K, Showalter C. et al The relationship between chief complaint and comparable sign in patients with spinal pain: An exploratory study. Man Ther 2015; 20: 451-455
64 Schoen CJ, Ablin JN, Ichesco E. et al A novel paradigm to evaluate conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia. J Pain Res 2016; 9: 711-719
65 Zheng Z, Wong D, Wan L. et al Pain adaptive individuals respond more strongly to placebo than non-pain adaptive. Being Adaptive to Pain Enhances Sham Acupuncture Analgesia: A Crossover Healthy Human Study. Pain 2014; 155: 968-976
66 Zheng Z, Wang K, Yao D. et al Adaptability to pain is associated with potency of local pain inhibition, but not conditioned pain modulation: a healthy human study. Pain 2014; 155: 968-976
67 Zheng Z, Wong Lit Wan D, Arendt-Nielsen L. et al Being Adaptive to Pain Enhances Sham Acupuncture Analgesia: A Crossover Healthy Human Study. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2017; 10: 385-395
68 Edmondston SJ, Allison GT, Gregg CD. et al Effect of position on the posteroanterior stiffness of the lumbar spine. Man Ther 1998; 3: 21-26