Nasentamponaden und Stents

Zusammenfassung

Nasentamponaden sind unverzichtbares Rüstzeug des HNO-Arztes, weswegen der aktuelle Stand zu Einsatz, Nutzen und Risiken von Nasentamponaden und Stents wiedergegeben wird. In der endonasalen Chirurgie sollten nach individuellem Abwägen der Notwendigkeit nur noch solche konventionellen Nasentamponaden eingesetzt werden, die eine glatte Oberfläche besitzen und damit Schleimhautschädigungen, potenzielle Verschlechterung der Wundheilung und Einschränkung des Patientenkomforts minimieren. Die endonasale funktionelle endoskopische NNH-Chirurgie impliziert moderne Verfahren der Nasentamponaden, die sich vom alten Formkörper, der Druck ausübt und Raum einnimmt, lösen (müssen). Die sog. hämostatischen/resorbierbaren Materialien sind ein erster, allerdings noch nicht ausreichender Schritt in diese Richtung, da sie zu vermehrten Synechien führen und teilweise Fremdkörperreaktionen aufgrund Inkorporation in die Schleimhaut auslösen. Das Zukleben der Nase ist eine einfache und sehr effektive Methode zur Schaffung eines feuchten Milieus zur Optimierung der endonasalen Wundheilung und Therapie einer trockenen Nase. Ein Stenting der Stirnhöhle wird nur dann empfohlen, wenn es operativ nicht gelingt, eine ausreichend weite, physiologische geformte und in weiten Teilen mit Schleimhaut bedeckte Stirnhöhlendrainage zu realisieren.

Abstract

Despite nasal packing is not necessary after functional endoscopic sinus surgery according to modern surgical techniques, nasal packing is a necessary tool in ENT. Therefore the state of the art regarding indications, benefit and risk of nasal packing and stents are given. In endonasal surgery only those conventional nasal packing materials should be used – if necessary – which have a smooth surface and minimize mucosal damage, potential worsening of wound healing and negative impact on patient comfort. Modern FESS implicates modern types of nasal packing, which leave the old concept of performing pressure and occupying space. So called hemostatic/resorbable materials are a first step in this direction. But they are critical, because these materials cause increased synechiae and sometimes foreign body reactions because of incorporation into the mucosa. Occlusion of the nose via simple taping of the nasal entrance is a simple and very effective method to create a moist environment to optimize endonasal wound healing or management of a dry nose. Stenting of the frontal sinus is only recommended if it is not possible to realize a sufficiently wide, physiologically formed and in large areas with mucosa covered frontal sinus outflow tract.

Nasentamponade - Zukleben der Nase - Okklusionsbehandlung - Wundheilung - Chitosan - Stirnhöhlenstent - hämostatische Tamponaden - Nutzen-Risiko-Analyse - Synechien - Review

nasal packing - nasal occlusion - wound healing - moist wound healing - Chitosane - frontal sinus stent - hemostatic packing - wound healing after FESS - benefit – risk – analysis

Literatur

• 1 Weber R, Hochapfel F, Leuwer R, Freigang B, Draf W. Tamponaden und Platzhalter in der endonasalen Chirurgie.  HNO. 2000;  48 240-256
• 2 Beule A G, Weber R K, Kaftan H, Hosemann W. Übersicht: Art und Wirkung geläufiger Nasentamponaden.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2004;  83 534-551
• 3 Weber R, Keerl R. Einsatz moderner Bild-Datenverarbeitung in der klinisch rhinologischen Forschung.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;  Suppl I 271-296
• 4 Weber R, Hosemann W, Draf W, Keerl R, Schick B, Schinzel S. Endonasale Stirnhöhlenchirurgie mit Langzeiteinlage eines Platzhalters.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 1997;  76 728-734
• 5 Weber R, Mai R, Hosemann W, Draf W, Toffel P H. The success of 6-month stenting in endonasal frontal sinus surgery.  ENT Journal. 2000;  79 930-941
• 6 Weitzel E K, Wormald P J. A Scientific Review of Middle Meatal Packing/Stents.  Am J Rhinol. 2008;  22 302-307
• 7 Bresnihan M, Mehigan A, Curran A. An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2007;  32 352-355
• 8 Titiz A, Zeyrek T, Ozcan M, Sabuncuoglu B, Yilmaz Y F, Unal A. The effects of merocel and glove finger tampon applications on the nasal septum mucosa of rabbits.  Rhinology. 2008;  46 112-115
• 9 Badran K, Malik T H, Belloso A, Timms M S. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;  30 333-337
• 10 Singer A J, Blanda M, Cronin K, LoGiudice-Khwaja M, Gulla J, Bradshaw J, Katz A. Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.  Ann Emerg Med. 2005;  45 134-139
• 11 Cruise A D, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Srouji I, Kanagalingam J, Georgalas C, Patel N N, Baida L, Lund V J. A randomized trial of Rapid Rhino Riemann and telfa nasal packs following endoscopic sinus surgery.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;  31 25-32
• 12 Gudziol V, Mewes T, Mann W J. Rapid Rhino: A new pneumatic nasal tamponade for posterior epistaxis.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;  132 152-155
• 13 McGarry G W, Aitken D. Intranasal balloon catheters: how do they work?.  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1991;  16 388-392
• 14 Simmen D B, Raghavan U, Briner H R, Manestar M, Groscurth P, Jones N S. The anatomy of the sphenopalatine artery for the endoscopic sinus surgeon.  Am J Rhinol. 2006;  20 502-505
• 15 Randall D A. Epistaxis packing. Practical pointers for nosebleed control.  Postgrad Med. 2006;  119 77-82
• 16 Gehrking E, Weerda H. A modified nasal tamponade with foam rubber protection in epistaxis.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 1995;  74 463-464
• 17 Ho E C, Mansell N J. How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing.  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;  29 754-757
• 18 Almeyda R, Shahzad A, Bleach N. Silicone Foley catheters outperform latex Foley catheters for post-nasal packing: an in vitro study.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2007;  32 480-491
• 19 McFerran D J, Edmonds S E. The use of balloon catheters in the treatment of epistaxis.  J Laryngol Otol. 1993;  107 197-200
• 20 Chevillard C, Rugina M, Bonfils P, Bougara A, Castillo L, Crampette L, Pandraud L, Samardzic M, Peynègre R. Evaluation of calcium alginate nasal packing (Algostéril) versus Polyvinyl acetal (Merocel) for nasal packing after inferior turbinate resection.  Rhinology. 2006;  44 58-61
• 21 Orlandi R R, Lanza D C. Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery?.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114 1541-1544
• 22 Eliashar R, Gross M, Wohlgelernter J, Sichel J Y. Packing in endoscopic sinus surgery: is it really required?.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;  134 276-279
• 23 Catalano P J, Roffman E J. Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST).  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  128 875-881
• 24 Rust K R, Stringer S P, Spector B. The effect of absorbable stenting on postoperative stenosis of the surgically enlarged maxillary sinus ostia in a rabbit animal model.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;  122 1395-1397
• 25 Tom L W, Palasti S, Potsic W P, Handler S D, Wetmore R F. The effects of gelatin film stents in the middle meatus.  Am J Rhinol. 1997;  11 229-232
• 26 Baumann A, Caversaccio M. Hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery using a specific gelatin-thrombin based agent (FloSeal).  Rhinology. 2003;  41 244-249
• 27 Björses K, Holst J. Various Local Hemostatic Agents with Different Modes of Action; an in vivo Comparative Randomized Vascular Surgical Experimental Study.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;  33 363-370
• 28 Chandra R K, Conley D B, Kern R C. The effect of FloSeal on mucosal healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a comparison with thrombin-soaked gelatin foam.  Am J Rhinol. 2003;  17 51-55
• 29 Chandra R K, Conley D B, Haines 3rd G K, Kern R C. Long-term effects of FloSeal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 240-243
• 30 Shrime M G, Tabaee A, Hsu A K, Rickert S, Close L G. Synechia formation after endoscopic sinus surgery and middle turbinate medialization with and without FloSeal.  Am J Rhinol. 2007;  21 174-179
• 31 Maccabee M S, Trune D R, Hwang P H. Effects of topically applied biomaterials on paranasal sinus mucosal healing.  Am J Rhinol. 2003;  17 203-207
• 32 Antisdel J L, Janney C G, Long J P, Sindwani R. Hemostatic agent microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) does not affect healing or intact sinus mucosa.  Laryngoscope. 2008;  118 1265-1269
• 33 Kimmelman C P, Edelstein D R, Cheng H J. Sepragel sinus (hylan B) as a postsurgical dressing for endoscopic sinus surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;  125 603-608
• 34 McIntosh D, Cowin A, Adams D, Rayner T, Wormald P J. The effect of a dissolvable hyaluronic acid-based pack on the healing of the nasal mucosa of sheep.  Am J Rhinol. 2002;  16 85-90
• 35 Rajapaksa S P, Cowin A, Adams D, Wormald P J. The effect of a hyaluronic acid-based nasal pack on mucosal healing in a sheep model of sinusitis.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 572-576
• 36 Miller R S, Steward D L, Tami T A, Sillars M J, Seiden A M, Shete M, Paskowski C, Welge J. The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;  128 862-869
• 37 Wormald P J, Boustred R N, Le T, Hawke L, Sacks R. A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery.  Am J Rhinol. 2006;  20 7-10
• 38 Orlandi R R, Shu X Z, McGill L, Petersen E, Prestwich G D. Structural variations in a single hyaluronan derivative significantly alter wound-healing effects in the rabbit maxillary sinus.  Laryngoscope. 2007;  117 1288-1295
• 39 Orlandi R R. Biomaterials for sinus implantation.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  15 44-47
• 40 Proctor M, Proctor K, Shu X Z, McGill L D, Prestwich G D, Orlandi R R. Composition of hyaluronan affects wound healing in the rabit maxillary sinus.  Am J Rhinol. 2006;  20 206-211
• 41 Leunig A, Betz C S, Siedeck V, Kastl K G. CMC Packing in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Does it Affect Patient Comfort?.  (zur Publikation eingereicht). ; 
• 42 Kastl K G, Betz C S, Siedek V, Leunig A. Control of bleeding following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) using carboxy-methylated cellulose packing.  (zur Publikation eingereicht). ; 
• 43 Kastl K G, Betz C S, Siedek V, Leunig A. Effect of Carboxymethylcellulose Nasal Packing on Wound Healing after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.  (zur Publikation eingereicht). ; 
• 44 Vaiman M, Eviatar E, Shlamkovich N, Segal S. Use of fibrin glue as a hemostatic in endoscopic sinus surgery.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;  114 237-241
• 45 Pomerantz J, Dutton J M. Platelet gel for endoscopic sinus surgery.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;  114 699-704
• 46 Hwang P H, Chan J M. Retinoic acid improves ciliogenesis after surgery of the maxillary sinus in rabbits.  Laryngoscope. 2006;  116 1080-1084
• 47 Gilbert M E, Kirker K R, Gray S D. Chondroitinsulfate hydrogel and wound healing in rabbit maxillary sinus mucosa.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114 1406-1409
• 48 Boenisch M, Nolst Trenité GJ. Fibrin glue for operative correction of septal deviations.  HNO. 2004;  52 963-967. German
• 49 Chandra R K, Kern R C. Advantages and disadvantages of topical packing in endoscopic sinus surgery.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  12 21-26
• 50 Athanasiadis T, Beule A G, Robinson B H, Robinson S R, Shi Z, Wormald P J. Effects of a novel chitosan gel on mucosal wound healing following endoscopic sinus surgery in a sheep model of chronic rhinosinusitis.  Laryngoscope. 2008;  118 1088-1094
• 51 Davey A, Majer P J. Surgical adhesions: A timely update, a great challenge for the future.  J Minimal Inv Gynecol. 2007;  14 15-22
• 52 Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine R M, Dervenis C, Young R L. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance.  Dig Surg. 2001;  18 260-273
• 53 Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies.  Eur J Surg. 1997;  Suppl 577 32-39
• 54 Metwally M, Watson A, Lilford R, Vandenkerckhove P. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery (review).  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  CD001298
• 55 Tjandra J J, Chan M K. A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barriere facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial.  Dis Colon Rect. 2008;  51 956-960
• 56 Chou T C, Fu E, Wu C J, Yeh J H. Chitosan enhances platelet adhesion and aggregation.  Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2003;  302 480-483
• 57 Dutkiewicz J K. Superabsorbent Materials from Shellfish Waste – A Review.  Inc J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;  63 373-381
• 58 Risbud M, Hardikar A, Bhonde R. Growth modulation of fibroblasts by chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogel: Implications for wound management?.  J Biosci. 2000;  25 25-31
• 59 Wedmore I, McManus J G, Pusateri A E, Holcomb J B. A Special Report on the Chitosan-based Hemostatic Dressing: Experience in Current Combat Operations.  J Trauma. 2006;  60 655-658
• 60 Zhou J, Elson C, Lee T D. Reduction in postoperative adhesion formation and re-formation after an abdominal operation with the use of N, 0-carboxymethyl chitosan.  Surgery. 2004;  135 307-312
• 61 Humphreys M R, Castle E P, Andrews P E, Gettmann M T, Ereth M H. Microporous polysaccharide hemispheres for management of laparoscopic trocar injuries to the spleen.  Am J Surg. 2008;  195 99-103
• 62 McIntosh D, Cowin A, Adams D, Wormald P J. The effect of an expandable polyvinyl acetate (Merocel) pack on the healing of the nasal mucosa of sheep.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 577-581
• 63 Weber R, Hay U. Ist die Nasentamponade noch zeitgemäß?.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2003;  82 650-654
• 64 Muluk N B, Oguztürk O, Ekici A, Koç C. Emotional effects of nasal packing measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients following nasal surgery.  J Otolaryngol. 2005;  34 172-177
• 65 Klinger M, Siegert R. Untersuchungen zur Mikrozirkulation der Nasenschleimhaut bei Verwendung von Ballontamponaden.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 1997;  76 127-130
• 66 Shaw C L, Dymock R B, Cowin A, Wormald P J. Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep.  J Laryngol Otol. 2000;  114 506-509
• 67 Jacob A, Faddis B T, Chole R A. Merogel hyaluronic acid sinonasal implants: osteogenic implications.  Laryngoscope. 2002;  112 37-42
• 68 Hashmi S M, Gopaul S R, Prinsley P R, Sansom J R. Swallowed nasal pack: a rare but serious complication of the management of epistaxis.  J Laryngol Otol. 2004;  118 372-373
• 69 Patterson D L, Yunginger J W, Dunn W F, Jones R T, Hunt L W. Anaphylaxis induced by the carboxymethylcellulose component of injectable triamcinolone acetonide suspension (Kenalog).  Ann Allerg Asthma Immunol. 1995;  74 163-166
• 70 Muroi N, Mori S, Ono S, Takahasi H K, Fujii T, Hosoi S, Hemmi K, Nishibori M. Allergy to carboxymethylcellulose.  Allergy. 2002;  57 1212-1213
• 71 Dowley A C, Strachan D R. Allergy to Merocel nasal packs causing septal perforation and inferior turbinate necrosis.  J Laryngol Otol. 2001;  115 735
• 72 Derkay , CS , Hirsch B E, Johnson J T, Wagner R L. Posterior Nasal Packing – Are Intravenous Antibiotics Really Necessary?.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;  115 439-441
• 73 Herzon A S. Bacteremia and local infections with nasal packing.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1971;  94 317-320
• 74 Hirsch B E. Antibiotic use with nasal packing. In: Johnson JT, Hrsg Antibiotic therapy in head and neck surgery. New York; Marcel Dekker 1987: 113-123
• 75 Weber R, Keerl R, Draf W, Wienke A, Kind M. Zur Begutachtung: Periorbitales Paraffingranulom nach Nasennebenhöhlenoperation.  Otorhinolaryngologia Nova. 1995;  5 87-90
• 76 Sindwani R, Cohen J T, Pilch B Z, Metson R B. Myospherulosis following sinus surgery: pathological curiosity or important clinical entity?.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 1123-1127
• 77 Gotwald T F, Sprinzl G M, Fischer H, Rettenbacher T. Retained packing gauze in the ethmoidal sinuses after endonasal sinus surgery: CT and surgical appearances.  AJR. 2001;  177 1487-1489
• 78 Kim M G, Baek R M, Minn K W, Heo C Y, Kwon S S, Park C Y. Nasal packs with X-ray indicators.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  56 342-343
• 79 Rajapaksa S P, McIntosh D, Cowin A, Wormald P J. The effect of insulin-like growth factor 1 incorporated into a hyaluronic acid-based nasal pack on nasal mucosal healing in a healthy sheep model and a sheep model of chronic sinusitis.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 251-256
• 80 Robinson S, Adams D, Wormald P J. The effect of nasal packing and prednisolone on mucosal healing and reciliation in a sheep model.  Rhinology. 2004;  42 68-72
• 81 Stammberger H. Role of CMC (Rapidrhino(r)) as a postoperative coating and drug delivery system in patients with polyposis – preliminary results. 3. Conference of Nasal and Polyposis 23. – 25. 4. 2004 in Brussel. 
• 82 Skilbeck C J, Oakley R. The fist model for nasal packing.  Eur J Emerg Med. 2006;  13 97-98
• 83 Sugarman P M, Alderson D J. Training model for nasal packing.  J Accid Emerg Med. 1995;  12 276-278
• 84 Thomas S, Pringle M. The use of airway mannequins to improve the teaching of nasal packing.  Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;  31 563-564
• 85 Evans A S, Young D, Adamson R. Is the nasal tampon a suitable treatment for epistaxis in Accident & Emergency? A comparison of outcomes for ENT and A&E packed patients.  J Laryngol Otol. 2004;  118 12-14
• 86 Shikani A H. A new middle meatal antrostomy stent for functional endoscopic surgery.  Laryngoscope. 1994;  104 638-640
• 87 Weber R, Keerl R, Draf W. Endonasale endoskopische Chirurgie von Kieferhöhlenmukozelen nach Caldwell-Luc-Operation.  Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2000;  79 532-535
• 88 Hosemann W, Schindler E, Wiegrebe E, Göpferich A. Innovative frontal sinus stent acting as a local drug – releasing system.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;  62 131-134
• 89 Herrmann B W, Citardi M J, Vogler G, Gardner L, Smith G, Javer A R, Burt H M, Jackson J, Kuhn F A. A preliminary report on the effects of paclitaxel-impregnated stents on sheep nasal mucosa.  Am J Rhinol. 2004;  18 119-124
• 90 Neel H B, Whicker J H, Lake C F. Thin rubber sheeting in frontal sinus surgery: animal and clinical studies.  Laryngoscope. 1976;  86 524-536
• 91 Schaller H. Zur Pathogenese und Therapie der Muco-Pyocele.  HNO. 1976;  24 448-451
• 92 Yamasoba T, Kikuchi S, Higo R. Transient positioning of a silicone T tube in frontal sinus surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;  111 776-780
• 93 Rains 3rd B M. Frontal sinus stenting.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001;  34 101-110
• 94 Lin D, Witterick I J. Frontal sinus stents: how long can they be kept in?.  J Otolaryngol. 2008;  37 119-123
• 95 Weber R K. Die endonasale Chirurgie der Stirnhöhle. Teil 1: Stirnhöhlendrainagen Typ I und II.  HNO. 2009 [im Druck]; 
• 96 Weber R K. Die endonasale Chirurgie der Stirnhöhle. Teil 2: Stirnhöhlendrainage Typ III. Tipps und Tricks, Nachbehandlung.  HNO. 2009 [im Druck];