Int J Sports Med 2011; 32(7): 535-541
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273754
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A ‘New’ Method to Normalise Exercise Intensity

K. E. Lansley1 , F. J. DiMenna1 , S. J. Bailey1 , A. M. Jones1
  • 1Exeter University, Sport and Health Sciences, Exeter, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision February 13, 2011

Publication Date:
11 May 2011 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Exercise intensity has traditionally been described, prescribed and normalised as a fraction (%) of the maximal oxygen uptake (O2max). We hypothesised that the extent of inter-subject variability in the physiological responses to exercise would be greater when work rates were prescribed using % O2max as compared to % ‘delta’ (Δ), a method of normalising exercise intensity in which both the gas exchange threshold (GET) and the O2max are considered. 9 men completed a ramp incremental test on a cycle ergometer to establish the GET and O2max. Subsequently, subjects completed 6 constant-work-rate exercise bouts at intensities corresponding to: 50%, 70% and 90% O2max; and 60% GET, 40% Δ (that is, 40% of the difference between the GET and O2max) and 80% Δ. For all bouts, exercise was continued for 20 min or until task failure if this occurred sooner. When exercise was prescribed using the % Δ concept, there were significant reductions in the inter-subject variability in pulmonary gas exchange, blood lactate accumulation, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion (all P<0.05). In conclusion, the % Δ concept resulted in more consistent inter-subject physiological responses to constant-work-rate exercise and should be used in preference to % O2max to more effectively normalise exercise intensity.

References

Correspondence

Prof. Andrew M. JonesPhD 

Exeter University

School of Sport and Health

Sciences

Richards Building

St. Luke's Campus

EX1 2LU Exeter

United Kingdom

Phone: + 44/01392/262 886

Fax: + 44/01392/264 726

Email: a.m.jones@exeter.ac.uk