Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

Jeffrey J. Cherian; Samik Banerjee; Bhaveen H. Kapadia; Julio J. Jauregui; Steven F. Harwin; Michael A. Mont

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1374811

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Knee Surg 2014; 27(03): 193-198
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1374811

Special Focus Section

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

Authors

Jeffrey J. Cherian

¹Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Samik Banerjee

¹Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Bhaveen H. Kapadia

¹Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Julio J. Jauregui

¹Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Steven F. Harwin

²Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
Michael A. Mont

¹Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

There is ongoing debate over the use of cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous generation prostheses resulted in less than optimal outcomes which was somewhat attributed to design issues. As the demand for TKA is continuously increasing and the current U.S. age population is getting younger, cemented fixation may not provide adequate long-term outcomes due to failure of fixation. Thus, there has been a reemergence of the development and use of cementless TKA. Recent short-term trials have demonstrated that modern cementless TKA has comparable survivorship and functional outcomes as cemented prostheses. However, more prospective, randomized trials are needed to clearly delineate any differences between these two fixation options.

Keywords

cementless total knee - noncemented - total knee arthroplasty - implant

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Kim YH, Park JW, Lim HM, Park ES. Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (2) 297-303
2 Freeman MA, McLeod HC, Levai JP. Cementless fixation of prosthetic components in total arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (176) 88-94
3 Freeman MA, Tennant R. The scientific basis of cement versus cementless fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (276) 19-25
4 Silverton CD. Cemented and cementless fixation: results and techniques. Instr Course Lect 2006; 55: 429-437
5 Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (4) 307-314
6 Efe T, Figiel J, Danek S, Tibesku CO, Paletta JR, Skwara A. Initial stability of tibial components in primary knee arthroplasty. A cadaver study comparing cemented and cementless fixation techniques. Acta Orthop Belg 2011; 77 (3) 320-328
7 McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP , et al. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (6) 971-975
8 Azboy I, Demirtaş A, Bulut M, Oztürkmen Y, Sükür E, Caniklioğlu M. Long-term results of porous-coated cementless total knee arthroplasty with screw fixation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013; 47 (5) 347-353
9 Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP, Camargo MP. Ten- to 14-year clinical followup of the cementless Natural Knee system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (388) 85-94
10 Whiteside LA. Cementless total knee replacement. Nine- to 11-year results and 10-year survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (309) 185-192
11 Brown TE, Harper BL, Bjorgul K. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (5) 380-387
12 Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Maheshwari A, Harwin SF. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 2013; ; December 7 (Epub ahead of print)
13 Ranawat CS, Meftah M, Windsor EN, Ranawat AS. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: down the boulevard of broken dreams - affirms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (11, Suppl A ): 82-84
14 Søballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993; 255: 1-58
15 Søballe K, Overgaard S. The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (5) 689-691
16 Gejo R, Akizuki S, Takizawa T. Fixation of the NexGen HA-TCP-coated cementless, screwless total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same type. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (4) 449-456
17 Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bünger C. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75 (2) 270-278
18 Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (5) 907-914
19 Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, Lira Neto OdeA, Queiroz AA, Navarro RD. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD006193
20 Berger RA, Lyon JH, Jacobs JJ , et al. Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 196-207
21 Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 66-72
22 Moran CG, Pinder IM, Lees TA, Midwinter MJ. Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (6) 848-857
23 Whiteside LA. Effect of porous-coating configuration on tibial osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 92-97
24 Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (7) 889-895
25 Watanabe H, Akizuki S, Takizawa T. Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (6) 824-829
26 Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, D'Alessio J. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (388) 41-50
27 Voigt JD, Mosier M. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (4) 448-459
28 Fernandez-Fairen M, Hernández-Vaquero D, Murcia A, Torres A, Llopis R. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (11) 3543-3553
29 Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A (3) 398-403
30 Harwin SF, Kester MA, Malkani AL, Manley MT. Excellent fixation achieved with cementless posteriorly stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (1) 7-13
31 Beaupré LA, al-Yamani M, Huckell JR, Johnston DW. Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2204-2211
32 Kamath AF, Lee GC, Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Garino JP, Israelite CL. Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (8) 1390-1395