Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Obstruction

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to differentiate benign from malignant lesions causing biliary duct obstruction.

Materials and Methods:

Between November 2006 and December 2013, 59 patients with bile duct obstruction of undetermined cause in baseline ultrasound underwent CEUS study. The enhancement and posterior washout were analyzed in real time all along the study duration (5′). The final diagnosis suggested by CEUS was compared with histologic diagnosis (47.5%) or with radiologic follow-up with TC, RM or ERCP.

Results:

Final diagnoses included 42 malignant lesions (cholangiocarcinoma n=22, metastases n=6, pancreatic carcinoma n=6, hepatocarcinoma n=4, gallbladder carcinoma n=2, ampullary carcinoma n=1 and lymphoma n=1) and 17 benign lesions (lithiasis or biliary sludge n=15, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis n=1 and indeterminate n=1). CEUS accuracy compared with final diagnoses based on combined reference standard was 86.4%. CEUS correctly identified 36 of 42 malignant lesions (sensibility 85.7%) and 15 of 17 benign lesions (specificity 88.2%). The positive predictive value of CEUS for malignancy was 94.7%, while the negative predictive value was 71.4%.

Conclusion:

CEUS is useful to differentiate between benign and malignant causes of obstructive jaundice. This technique improves the detection of bile duct invasion in hepatic neoplasms and permits better evaluation of intra- and extraductal extension of hilar hepatobiliary tumors.

Key words

abdomen - biliary system - ultrasound

• References

• 1 Rogoveanu I, Gheonea DI, Saftoiu A et al. The role of imaging methods in identifying the causes of extrahepatic cholestasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2006; 15: 265-271
• 2 Blackbourne LH, Earnhardt RC, Sistrom CL et al. The sensitivity and role of ultrasound in the evaluation of biliary obstruction. Am Surg 1994; 60: 683-690
• 3 Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in Body Imaging: What Role?. Radiology 2010; 257: 24-39
• 4 Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1369-1375
• 5 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 11-29
• 6 Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 33-59
• 7 Xu H-X. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the biliary system: Potential uses and indications. World J Radiol 2009; 1: 37-44
• 8 Meacock LM, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS. Evaluation of gallbladder and biliary duct disease using microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 615-627
• 9 Sparchez Z. Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of biliary duct disease. Med Ultrason 2014; 16: 41-47
• 10 Dietrich CF, Cui XW, Boozari B et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic algorithm of hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma, comments on the AASLD guidelines. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: S57-S66
• 11 Xu H-X, Chen L-D, Xie X-Y et al. Enhancement pattern of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 197-202
• 12 Liu LN, Xu HX, Zheng SG et al. Ultrasound Findings of Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm in Bile Duct and the Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2014;
• 13 Wildner D, Bernatik T, Greis C et al. CEUS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocellular Carcinoma in 320 . Patients-Early or Late Washout Matters: A Subanalysis of the DEGUM Multicenter Trial. Ultraschall Med 2015; 36: 132-139
• 14 Fan Z, Li Y, Yan K et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions – A comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 1385-1390