Use and Effectiveness of the Cadaver-Lab in Orthopaedic and Traumatology Education: An Italian Survey

Michele Losco; Filippo Familiari; Francesco Giron; Rocco Papalia

doi:10.1055/s-0037-1608949

Joints, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2017; 05(04): 197-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608949

Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Use and Effectiveness of the Cadaver-Lab in Orthopaedic and Traumatology Education: An Italian Survey

Authors

Michele Losco

¹Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, AOUC Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
Filippo Familiari

²Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università degli Studi “Magna Graecia” di Catanzaro, Campus Universitario “Salvatore Venuta” Viale Europa, Rome, Italy
Francesco Giron

³Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Villa Salus, Mestre, Italy
Rocco Papalia

⁴Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide basic information on the availability and current use of cadaver laboratories in the education of orthopaedic residents and trainees and to determine the interest for the implementation of this type of training.

Methods All Orthopaedic residents and trainees who attended a cadaver laboratory organized by SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology) between 2013 and 2016 were asked to complete a survey on the availability and current use of cadaver laboratories in the education of Orthopaedic residents and trainees. The survey was sent via e-mail to 102 Orthopaedic residents and trainees. All data were analyzed and all responses are presented as counts, percentages, or means.

Results Thirty-eight (37.2%) Orthopaedics and traumatology residents and trainees completed the survey and were included in this analysis. Eighteen trainees (18/38; 44.3%) attended a cadaver laboratory focused on lower limb surgery, whereas 20 (20/38; 52.7%) on upper limb surgery. Twenty participants (55.7%) perceived skills laboratory sessions as extremely beneficial to the understanding and becoming familiar with the normal surgical anatomy; moreover, 16 (45.7%) participants considered the cadaver laboratory extremely beneficial to the understanding of a specific surgical technique and very beneficial (44.4%) to become confident with arthroscopic or other specific surgical instruments. Over 60% of participants perceived cadaver laboratory to be very to extremely beneficial to increase confidence and speed in the operating room (OR), and more than a half of them considered skills laboratory sessions to be extremely beneficial to increase participation and decrease the occurrence of damages in the real surgical activity.

Conclusion Orthopaedic residents and trainees found the addition of a cadaver laboratory for teaching surgical skills a significant benefit to both their overall education and surgical skills training.

Level of Evidence Level IV, survey study.

Keywords

orthopaedics - residents' training - survey - cadaver laboratory

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Sanfey HA, Dunnington GL. Basic surgical skills testing for junior residents: current views of general surgery program directors. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (03) 406-412
2 Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Natividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL. Current and future use of surgical skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident education: a national survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (01) e4
3 Atesok K, Mabrey JD, Jazrawi LM, Egol KA. Surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (07) 410-422
4 Leong JJ, Leff DR, Das A. , et al. Validation of orthopaedic bench models for trauma surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (07) 958-965
5 Elfar J, Menorca RM, Reed JD, Stanbury S. Composite bone models in orthopaedic surgery research and education. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (02) 111-120
6 Henn III RF, Shah N, Warner JJ, Gomoll AH. Shoulder arthroscopy simulator training improves shoulder arthroscopy performance in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (06) 982-985
7 Akhtar KS, Chen A, Standfield NJ, Gupte CM. The role of simulation in developing surgical skills. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2014; 7 (02) 155-160
8 Howells NR, Gill HS, Carr AJ, Price AJ, Rees JL. Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomised blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (04) 494-499
9 Van Heest A, Putnam M, Agel J, Shanedling J, McPherson S, Schmitz C. Assessment of technical skills of orthopaedic surgery residents performing open carpal tunnel release surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (12) 2811-2817
10 Wolf BR, Britton CL. How orthopaedic residents perceive educational resources. Iowa Orthop J 2013; 33: 185-190
11 O'Neill PJ, Cosgarea AJ, Freedman JA, Queale WS, McFarland EG. Arthroscopic proficiency: a survey of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship directors and orthopaedic surgery department chairs. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (07) 795-800
12 Snow M, Stanish WD. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: how big is the learning curve?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (09) 1195-1200
13 Vitale MA, Kleweno CP, Jacir AM, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS. Training resources in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (06) 1393-1398
14 Insel A, Carofino B, Leger R, Arciero R, Mazzocca AD. The development of an objective model to assess arthroscopic performance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (09) 2287-2295
15 Hall MP, Kaplan KM, Gorczynski CT, Zuckerman JD, Rosen JE. Assessment of arthroscopic training in U.S. orthopedic surgery residency programs--a resident self-assessment. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2010; 68 (01) 5-10
16 Immerman I, Kubiak EN, Zuckerman JD. Resident work-hour rules: a survey of residents' and program directors' opinions and attitudes. Am J Orthop 2007; 36 (12) E172-E179