Thromb Haemost 2000; 84(05): 779-783
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1614115
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Quantification of Platelet-associated IgG for Differential Diagnosis of Patients with Thrombocytopenia

Authors

  • H. Hagenström

    1   From the Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Lübeck School of Medicine, Germany
  • P. Schlenke

    1   From the Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Lübeck School of Medicine, Germany
  • H. Hennig

    1   From the Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Lübeck School of Medicine, Germany
  • H. Kirchner

    1   From the Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Lübeck School of Medicine, Germany
  • H. Klüter

    2   Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Red Cross Transfusion Service of Baden-Württemberg, Mannheim, Germany

We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Bettina Schmitt and Michael Paulsen and thank Ms. Una Doherty for editing the manuscript. We are indebted to Prof. S. Panzer, Vienna, for proof-reading the manuscript.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 24 December 1999

Accepted after resubmission 30 May 2000

Publication Date:
13 December 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

Immune thrombocytopenia is due to platelet destruction by circulating glycoprotein-specific antibodies and is found in various disorders. Methods for the detection of platelet-associated IgG (PAIgG) are generally sensitive but unspecific, whereas glycoprotein-specific assays are highly specific but less sensitive. Usefully, a sensitive screening method for PAIgG detection would also provide information for differential diagnosis. We developed a quantitative direct Platelet Immunofluorescence Test (PIFT) by flow cytometry and studied 79 thrombocytopenic patients with immune thrombocytopenia and other disorders. The sensitivity of the assay was 94%, its specificity 66% for the detection of a clinically obvious immune thrombocytopenia. PAIgG levels of patients with immune thrombocytopenia differed significantly from those of other patients with low platelet counts (p <0.001). The quantitative PIFT proved to be a sensitive method for PAIgG detection and should therefore be used as a screening method. In addition, it could be helpful for differential diagnosis in marked thrombocytopenia where a MAIPA is not feasible.