Application of a Diagnostic Clinical Model for the Management of Hospitalized Patients with Suspected Deep-vein Thrombosis^[*]

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the determination of pretest probability using a simple clinical model and the SimpliRED D-dimer could be used to improve the management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Consecutive hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis, had their pretest probability determined using a clinical model and had a SimpliRED D-dimer assay. Patients at low pretest probability underwent a single ultrasound test. A negative ultrasound excluded the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis whereas a positive ultrasound was confirmed by venography. Patients at moderate pretest probability with a positive ultrasound were treated for deep-vein thrombosis whereas patients with an initial negative ultrasound underwent a single follow-up ultrasound one week later. Patients at high pretest probability with a positive ultrasound were treated whereas those with negative ultrasound underwent venography. All patients were followed for three months for the development of venous thromboembolic complications. Overall, 28% (42/150), and 10% (5/50), 21% (14/71) and 76% (22/29) of the low, moderate and high pretest probability patients, respectively, had deep vein thrombosis. Two of 111 (1.8%; 95% CI = 0.02% to 6.4%) patients considered to have deep vein thrombosis excluded had events during three-month follow-up. Overall 13 of 150 (8.7%) required venography and serial testing was limited to 58 of 150 (38.7%) patients. The negative predictive value of the SimpliRED D-dimer in patients with low pretest probability was 96.2%, which is not statistically different from the negative predictive value of a negative ultrasound result in low pretest probability patients (97.8%). Management of hospitalized patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis based on clinical probability and ultrasound of the proximal deep veins is safe and feasible.

Dr. Philip Wells and Dr. David Anderson are the recipients of Research Scholarships from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

• References

• 1 Rose SC, Zwiebel WJ, Murdock LE, Hofmann AA, Priest DL, Knighton RA et al. Insensitivity of color Doppler flow imaging for detection of acute calf deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic postoperative patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993; 4: 111-7.
• 2 Pedersen OM, Aslaksen A, Vik-Mo H, Bassoe AM. Compression ultrasonography in hospitalized patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 2217-9.
• 3 Quintavalla R, Larini P, Miselli A, Mandrioli R, Ugolotti U, Pattacini C et al. Duplex Doppler diagnosis of symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs. Eur J Radiol 1992; 15: 32-6.
• 4 Sluzewski M, Koopman MMW, Schurr KH, van Vroonhoven Th JMV, Ruijs JHJ. Influence of negative ultrasound findings on the management of in- and outpatients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Eur J Radiol 1991; 13: 174-7.
• 5 Aronen HJ, Svedström E, Yrjänä J, Bondestam S. Compression sonography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Ann Med 1994; 26: 377-80.
• 6 Heijboer H, Cogo A, Buller HR, Prandoni P, ten Cate JW. Detection of deep vein thrombosis with impedance plethysmography and real-time compression ultrasonography in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1901-3.
• 7 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AWA, Foster G, Kearon C et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345: 1326-30.
• 8 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.
• 9 Wells PS, Brill-Edwards P, Stevens P, Panju A, Patel A, Douketis J et al. A novel and rapid whole-blood assay for D-Dimer in patients with clincally suspected deep vein thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2184-7.
• 10 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B. SimpliRED D-dimer can reduce the diagnostic tests in suspected deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 1998; 351: 1405-6.
• 11 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg 1972; 104: 134-44.
• 12 Heijboer H, Buller HR, Lensing AWA, Turpie AGG, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. N Eng J Med 1993; 329: 1365-9.
• 13 Cogo A, Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 2777-80.
• 14 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Ockelford PA, Buller HR et al. Diagnostic efficacy of impedance plethysmography for clinicall suspecteddeep-vein thrombosis. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 21-8.
• 15 Heijboer H, Ginsberg JS, Büller HR, Lensing AWA, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. The use of the D-dimer test in combination with non-invasive testing versus serial non-invasive testing alone for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1992; 67: 510-3.
• 16 Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A, de Moerloose P, Slosman D, Didier D et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, d-dimer levels and ultrasonography: A management study. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 531-6.
• 17 Bernardi E. Simplified diagnostic approach for the management of outpatients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1997 suppl 767.
• 18 Wells PS, Lensing AWA, Anderson DR, Hirsh J. The distribution of deep vein thrombosis in asymptomatic post-operative patients and the implications for screening. Blood 1992; 80 (s) 316.