Intraoral Repair of All Ceramic Fixed Partial Denture Utilizing Preimpregnated
Fiber Reinforced Composite

Süha Turkaslan; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1697356

European Journal of Dentistry, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(01): 63-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697356

Original Article

Dental Investigation Society

Intraoral Repair of All Ceramic Fixed Partial Denture Utilizing Preimpregnated Fiber Reinforced Composite

Süha Turkaslan

^aDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

,

Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay

^bDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry & Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

als PDF herunterladen

ABSTRACT

All ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPD)s exhibit enhanced biocompatibility and esthetics as compared to metal-ceramic restorations. However, framework fractures are frequently reported especially when the connector dimensions are inadequate to withstand the high tensile stresses. The repair of the failed connector would be desirable rather than the complete removal and renewal since the latter is an expensive and time consuming procedure. Furthermore, the replacement or removal of the restoration for extra-oral repair purposes might increase the risk of destroying the entire restoration or damaging the abutment teeth during the removal. This article presents a direct intra-oral method that may be used to repair the connector fractures of all-ceramic FPDs which are otherwise clinically satisfactory. In the present technique, the connector is reconstructed intraorally utilizing composite resin restorative material reinforced with E-glass-fiber. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:63-68)

Key words:

Fixed partial denture - All-ceramic - Fiber-reinforced composite - Intra-oral repair - Fracture

PDF (2977 kb)

Referenzen

REFERENCES
1 Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 433-442
2 Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ. Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 177-183
3 Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hammerle CHF. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 930-937
4 Sorensen JA, Knode H, Torres TJ. In-ceram all-ceramic bridge technology. Quintessence Dent Technol 1992; 15: 41-46
5 McLaren EA. All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 307-308
6 Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT, Raffeiner O, Meredith HR, Foser HP. A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Pract Peridont Aesthet Dent 1999; 11: 95-106
7 Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 520-525
8 Goldberg AJ, Freilich MA. An innovative pre-impregnated glass fiber for reinforcing composites. Dent Clin North Am 1999; 43: 127-133
9 VaLLittu PK. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 125-130
10 Vallittu PK. Use of woven glass fibres to reinforce a composite veneer. A fracture resistance and acoustic emission study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 423-429
11 Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 51-60
12 Ozcan M, vander Sleen JM, Kurunmaki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 283-288
13 Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spikermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 231-238
14 Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1253-1258
15 Appleby DC. Repair of fractured connectors in a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 84: 449-450
16 Galiatsatos AA. An indirect repair technique for fractured metal-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 321-323
17 Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 483-489
18 Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 119-124
19 Barreto MT, Bottaro BF. A practical approach to porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 349-351
20 Chung K, Hwang Y. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair system with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 267-274
21 Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 6-11
22 Cardoso AC, Spinelli Filho P.. Clinical and laboratory techniques for repair of fractured porcelain in fixed prostheses: a case report. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 835-838
23 Kim BK, Bae HEK, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 357-362
24 EUakwa AE, ShortaLL AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 485-490
25 VaLLittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 318-326
26 Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 947-955
27 Karmaker A, Prasad A. Effect of design parameters on the flexural properties of fibre-reinforced composites. J Mater SciLett 2000; 19: 663-665
28 Li W, Swain MV, Li Q, Ironside J, Steven GP. Fiber reinforced dental bridge Part I: experimental investigation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4987-4993
29 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli and x-ray fiffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 374-380
30 Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 29-36
31 Fennis WM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, Lassila LV, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Vallittu PK. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 565-572
32 Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fiber-reinforced composite to tooth structure. J Dent 2005; 33: 509-516