Summary
Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of pancarpal arthrodesis (PCA) constructs stabilized
at 20° of extension using either a 3.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate
(LC-DCP) or a 3.5/2.7 mm hybrid plate (HP).
Methods: Seven forelimb pairs were used from dogs of similar size. All soft tissues were removed
except for supporting structures of the carpus and proximal metacarpal region. All
plates were accurately bent to 20°, and then instrumented with two, 350Ω strain gauges
applied at the level of the bend. Constructs were embedded in epoxy moulds then mounted
onto a servo-hydraulic testing machine. Specimens were loaded for 10 cycles at 100N,
200N and 300N. Tenth cycle construct compliance (CC), maximum angular deformation
(MAD), and peak plate strain (PPS) were compared using two-factor analysis of variance
(ANOVA) and Student-Newman- Keuls post-hoc tests (p <0.05).
Results: Regardless of load, CC was 29% to 33% smaller in the HP than the LC-DCP group (p
<0.03). In each group, the CC significantly increased with increasing loads (p <0.02).
Mean MAD was 19% to 22% less in HP than LC-DCP constructs, with significant differences
seen at 200N and 300N loads. In both groups, MAD was significantly greater with increasing
loads (p <0.02). In addition, PPS was 37% to 43% smaller for HP than LC-DCP.
Clinical significance: The mechanical advantages of the HP over the LC-DCP make it a viable alternative
for PCA. Smaller CC, MAD and PSS of the HP may reduce the risk of implant failure
and postoperative morbidity following PCA.
Keywords
Pancarpal arthrodesis - carpal arthrodesis - hybrid plate - limited contact dynamic
compression plate - fusion angle - dog
