Computed tomographic evaluation of elbow congruity during arthroscopy in a canine cadaveric model

O. T. Skinner; C. M. R. Warren-Smith; N. J. Burton; K. J. Parsons

doi:10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0017

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(01): 19-24
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-02-0017

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Computed tomographic evaluation of elbow congruity during arthroscopy in a canine cadaveric model

Autoren

O. T. Skinner

¹Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
C. M. R. Warren-Smith

¹Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
N. J. Burton

¹Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
K. J. Parsons

¹Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To assess the effect of arthro-scope insertion, using a carbon-fibre rod model, on humero-radial, humero-ulnar and radio-ulnar congruity, as assessed by computed tomography (CT).

Methods: Cadaveric Greyhound elbow joints were assessed at a flexion angle of 135 ± 5° using CT. For condition 1, a 36 mm fulcrum induced cubital valgus, as used to aid arthro-scope insertion. For conditions 2 and 3, a single 1.8 or 2.5 mm diameter rod was inserted under arthroscopic guidance to simulate arthroscope position for assessment of the medial coronoid process. Repeat CT scans were obtained for all conditions and parasagittal sections were reconstructed to evaluate medial, axial and lateral positions within the elbow. Humero-radial, humeroulnar, and radio-ulnar congruity measurements were obtained. Differences between groups were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results: Mean (±SD) change in radio-ulnar step between conditions 1 and 3 was 0.6 ± 0.3 mm (axial), 0.8 ± 0.6 mm (medial), and 0.5 ± 0.1 mm (lateral). Insertion of rods induced a significant decrease in radio-ulnar step in all planes. Significant differences were also identified between groups for humero-radial, humero-ulnar, and radio-ulnar congruity.

Clinical significance: Insertion of carbon-fibre rods as a model for elbow arthroscope insertion induces elbow incongruity. Changes in radio-ulnar congruity are small but the effect of arthroscope diameter should be considered when assessing elbow congruity.

Keywords

Elbow - congruity - arthroscopy - computed tomography - dog

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Gemmill TJ, Clements DN. Fragmented coronoid process in the dog: is there a role for incongruency?. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 361-368.
2 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: part II. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 725-730.
3 Preston CA, Schulz KS, Taylor KT. et al. In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar ostectomy on contact patterns in the elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1548-1556.
4 Proks P, Necas A, Stehlik L. et al. Quantification of humeroulnar incongruity in Labrador Retrievers with and without medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 981-986.
5 Gemmill TJ, Mellor DJ, Clements DN. et al. Evaluation of elbow incongruency using reconstructed CT in dogs suffering fragmented coronoid process. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 327-333.
6 Blond L, Dupuis J, Beauregard G. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic detection of canine elbow incongruence in an in vitro model. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 210-216.
7 Mason DR, Schulz KS, Samii VF. et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Vet Surg 2004; 31: 125-132.
8 Kramer A, Holsworth IG, Wisner ER. et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of canine radioulnar incongruence in vivo. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 24-29.
9 Holsworth IG, Wisner ER, Scherrer WE. et al. Accuracy of computerized tomographic evaluation of canine radio-ulnar incongruence in vitro. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 108-113.
10 House MR, Marino DJ, Lesser ML. Effect of limb position on elbow congruity with CT evaluation. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 154-160.
11 Samoy Y, Gielen I, Van Caelenberg A. et al. Computed tomography findings in 32 joints affected with severe elbow incongruity and fragmented medial coronoid process. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 486-494.
12 Groth AM, Benigni L, Moores AP. et al. Spectrum of computed tomographic findings in 58 canine elbows with fragmentation of the medial coronoid process. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 15-22.
13 Burton NJ, Warren-Smith CMR, Roper DP. et al. CT assessment of the influence of dynamic loading on physiological incongruency of the canine elbow. J Small Anim Pract 2013; 54: 291-298.
14 Böttcher P, Werner H, Ludewig E. et al. Visual estimation of radioulnar incongruence in dogs using three-dimensional image rendering: an in vitro study based on computed tomographic imaging. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 161-168.
15 Wagner K, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Radiographic, computed tomographic, and arthroscopic evaluation of experimental radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 691-698.
16 Samoy Y, Van Vynckt D, Gielen I. et al. Arthroscopic findings in 32 joints affected by severe elbow incongruity with concomitant fragmented medial coronoid process. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 355-361.
17 Werner H, Winkels P, Grevel V. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of arthroscopic estimation of positive and negative radio-ulnar incongruence in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 437-441.
18 Coggeshall JD, Reese DJ, Kim SE. et al. Arthroscopic-guided ulnar distraction for the correction of elbow incongruency in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55: 46-51.
19 Schulz KS, Holsworth IG, Hornof WJ. Self-retaining braces for canine arthroscopy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 77-82.
20 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Simoens P. Elbow arthroscopy in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 191-198.
21 Proks P, Stehlík L, Irová K. et al. Relationship between radioulnar incongruity of elbow joints and the type of fragmented processus coronoideus medialis. Acta Vet Brno 2010; 79: 307-312.
22 Gemmill TJ, Hammond G, Mellor D. et al. Use of reconstructed computed tomography for the assessment of joint spaces in the canine elbow. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 66-74.
23 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: part I. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 711-724.
24 Keller GG, Kreeger JM, Mann FA. et al. Correlation of radiographic, necropsy and histologic findings in 8 dogs with elbow dysplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997; 38: 272-276.
25 Kunzel W, Breit S, Probst A. Morphologische Besonderheiten am Olekranon des Hundes und deren funktionelle Bedeutung [Morphological features on the olecranon and their functional significance in the dog]. Wien Tierärztl Monatsschr 2002; 89: 157-162.
26 Probst A, Modler F, Künzel W. et al. Demonstration of the articular cartilage of the canine ulnar trochlear notch using high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet J 2008; 177: 63-70.
27 Wolschrijn CF, Kik MJL, Weijs WA. Cartilage-free areas in the elbow joint of young golden retrievers. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 275: 990-996.
28 Collins KE, Cross AR, Lewis DD. et al. Comparison of the radius of curvature of the ulnar trochlear notch of Rottweilers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 968-973.
29 Janach KJ, Breit SM, Künzel WWF. Assessment of the geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 211-218.