Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-05-0083
Ex vivo torsional properties of a 2.5 mm veterinary interlocking nail system in canine femurs
Comparison with a 2.4 mm limited contact bone plateFinancial support: Pet Trust, CAPES, CNPq, and PROPG/Unesp provided funding for this project. B. Braun Vet Care GmbH donated the Targon Vet Nail System equipment.
Publication History
Received:
29 May 2016
Accepted:
10 January 2016
Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)
Summary
Objective: To evaluate the torsional properties of the Targon® Vet Nail System (TVS) in small canine femurs and to compare these properties to those of the 2.4 mm LC-DCP® plates.
Methods: Thirty-six cadaveric femurs were allocated to three groups (n = 12). In all bones, points just distal to the lesser trochanter and just proximal to the fabellae were marked and a midshaft transverse osteotomy was performed. Group 1: bones were fixed with the 2.5 mm TVS with the bolts applied at the pre-identified marks. Group 2: A TVS system with 25% shorter inter-bolt distance was used. Group 3: A 7-hole 2.4 mm LCDCP® plates were applied. All constructs were tested non-destructively for 10 cycles, followed by an acute torsion to failure.
Results: Torque at yield was 0.806 ± 0.183 and 0.805 ± 0.093 Nm for groups 1 and 2 and 1.737 ± 0.461 Nm for group 3. Stiffness was 0.05 ± 0.01, 0.05 ± 0.007, and 0.14 ± 0.015 Nm/° for groups 1 to 3 respectively. Maximal angular displacement under cyclic loading was 16.6° ± 2.5°, 15.6° ± 2.1°, and 7.8° ± 1.06° respectively. There was no significant difference for any of the parameters between groups 1 and 2. Both torque at yield and stiffness were significantly greater between group 3 and groups 1 and 2.
Clinical significance: The TVS had approximately half the torsional strength and approximately 1/3 of the stiffness of the 2.4 mm bone plate. Slippage of the locking mechanism was probably the cause of the early failure. The system should be considered as a low-strength and low-stiffness system when compared to bone plates.
-
References
- 1 Stiffler KS.. Internal fracture fixation. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2004; 19: 105-113.
- 2 Frigg A., Rillmann P., Perren T.. et al. Intramedullary nailing of clavicular midshaft fractures with the titanium elastic nail: problems and complications. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 352-359.
- 3 Gatineau M., Planté J.. Ulnar interlocking intramedullary nail stabilization of a proximal radio-ulnar fracture in a dog. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 1025-1029.
- 4 Déjardin LM., Cabassu JB., Guillou RP.. et al. In vivo biomechanical evaluation of a novel angle-stable interlocking nail design in a canine tibial fracture model. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 271-281.
- 5 Déjardin LM., Lansdowne JL., Sinnott MT.. et al. In vitro mechanical evaluation of torsional loading in simulated canine tibiae for a novel hourglass-shaped interlocking nail with a self-tapping tapered locking design. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 678-685.
- 6 Larin A., Eich CS., Parker RB.. et al. Repair of diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats using interlocking intramedullary nails: 12 cases (1996-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219: 1098-1104.
- 7 Díaz-Bertrana MC., Durall I., Puchol JL.. et al. Interlocking nail treatment of long-bone fractures in cats: 33 Cases (1995-2004). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 119-126.
- 8 Brückner M., Unger M., Spies M.. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a newly designed interlocking nail system to a standard DCP. Testing of cat femora in an osteotomy gap model. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2014; 42: 79-87.
- 9 Brooks DB., Burstein AH., Frankel VH.. The biomechanics of torsional fractures: the stress concentration effect of a drill hole. J bone Jt Surg 1970; 52: 507-514.
- 10 Von Pfeil DJF., Déjardin LM., DeCamp CE.. et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a plate-rod combination-construct and an interlocking nail-construct for experimentally induced gap fractures in canine tibiae. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 1536-1543.
- 11 Muir P., Johnson KA., Markel MD.. Area moment of inertia for comparison of implant cross-sectional geometry and bending stiffness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 146-152.
- 12 Hulse DA., Kerwin SC., Mertens D.. Fractures of the femoral diaphysis. In: Johnson AL., Houlton JEF., Vannini R.. editors. AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat New York: Thieme; 2005: 287-295.
- 13 Durall I., Diaz-Bertrana MC., Puchol JL.. et al. Radiographic findings related to interlocking nailing: windshield-wiper effect, and locking screw failure. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 217-222.
- 14 Koch D.. Implants: description and application. Screws and plates. In: Johnson AL., Houlton JEHVR.. editors. AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat New York: Thieme; 2005: 27-50.
- 15 Edgerton BC., An KN., Morrey BF.. Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 851-855.
- 16 Ho KW., Gilbody J., Jameson T.. et al. The effect of 4 mm bicortical drill hole defect on bone strength in a pig femur model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 797-802.
- 17 Alford JW., Bradley MP., Fadale PD.. et al. Resorbable fillers reduce stress risers from empty screw holes. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2007; 63: 647-654.