Use of a helical composite free flap for alar defect reconstruction with a supermicrosurgical technique

The highly contoured nature of the nose and the abundant free margin makes it especially difficult to reconstruct. In this report, we describe the use of a new helical rim free flap technique for the reconstruction of full-thickness nasal alar defects via supermicrosurgery. Briefly, after a wide excision with a margin of 0.7 cm, an alar defect with a size of 1×1×0.5cm was obtained, which included the full thickness of the skin, mucosa, and lower lateral cartilage. Vessel dissection was performed in a straightforward manner, starting from the incision margin for flap harvest, without any further dissection for reach the greater trunk of the superficial temporal artery. The flap was inset in order to match the contour of the contralateral ala. We closed the donor site via rotation and advancement. No donor site morbidity was observed, despite the presence of a small scar that could easily be covered with hair. The alar contour was satisfactory, and the patient was satisfied with the results. The supermicrosurgical technique did not require further dissection to identify the vessels for anastomosis, leading to better cosmetic outcomes and a reduced operating time.

Keywords

Nose - Free tissue flaps - Carcinoma, squamous cell

This article was presented as a poster at the 2016 Research and Reconstructive Forum on April 7–8, 2016, in Seoul, Korea

Publication History

Received: 31 July 2017

Accepted: 24 October 2017

Article published online:
03 April 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Castello JR, Taglialatela Scafati S, Sanchez O. Bilateral nasal ala reconstruction of the cocaine-injured nose with 2 free reverse-flow helical rim flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73: 304-6
• 2 Driscoll BP, Baker SR. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3: 91-9
• 3 Lin SD, Lin GT, Lai CS. et al. Nasal alar reconstruction with free “accessory auricle”. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 827-9
• 4 Kim KS, Eo SR, Kim DY. et al. A new strategy of fingertip reattachment: sequential use of microsurgical technique and pocketing of composite graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 73-9
• 5 Cordova A, Pirrello R, D’Arpa S. et al. Superior pedicle retroauricular island flap for ear and temporal region reconstruction: anatomic investigation and 52 cases series. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60: 652-7
• 6 Cordova A, D’Arpa S, Pirrello R. et al. Retroauricular skin: a flaps bank for ear reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61(Suppl 1): S44-51
• 7 Song R, Song Y, Qi K. et al. The superior auricular artery and retroauricular arterial island flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 657-67
• 8 Zhang YX, Yang J, Wang D. et al. Extended applications of vascularized preauricular and helical rim flaps in reconstruction of nasal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1589-97
• 9 Thomas DJ, King AR, Peat BG. Excision margins for nonmelanotic skin cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 57-63
• 10 Menick FJ. A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1839-55
• 11 Little SC, Hughley BB, Park SS. Complications with forehead flaps in nasal reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 1093-9
• 12 Holzmann D, Forster NA, Vital D. et al. Reconstruction of defects involving the nasal ala and the nasolabial fold: the role of the microvascular prehelical rim graft. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2015; 77: 255-61