Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2006; 03(01): 37-42
DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0508(06)80008-0
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Fallacies of Routine CT Scan in Identifying Lesions in Severe Head Injury (Preliminary findings of an autopsy study)

Ashis Pathak
,
Dalbir Singh
*   Department of Forensic Medicine, Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
,
N Khandelwal
**   Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
› Author Affiliations
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 April 2017 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Though CT scan is a common and reliable tool for diagnosis in severe head injury, may a times there is no detectable lesion seen in the CT scan of a patient with severe head injury to explain the neurological status. Literature search did not reveal any study which has systematically analyzed the failures of CT scan in identifying traumatic lesions in a qualitative and quantitative manner. The present study is a preliminary attempt to correlate the CT scan and autopsy findings in patients of fatal head injury. The study highlights fallacies of CT scan in detecting lesions close to the bone, for instance, SDH, SAH, basal contusions. The linear fractures at the vault and the basal region are also likely to be missed in majority of the cases in routine CT scan. The study tries to suggest some modification in the technique of CT scan, which might pick up hitherto undiagnosed traumatic lesions in the brain.

Keywords

head trauma - head injury - diagnostic imaging - CT
 

  • References

  • 1 Vinchon M, Noule N, Tchofo PJ, Soto-Ares G, Fourier C, Dhellemmes P. Imaging of head injuries in infants: temporal correlates and forensic implications for the diagnosis of child abuse. J Neurosurg 101 (Suppl. 01) 2004; 44-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Toyama Y, Kobayashi T, Nishiyama Y, Satoh K, Ohkawa M, Seki K. CT for acute stage of closed head injury. Radiat Med 23 2005; 309-316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Weber C, Grzyska U, Lehner E, Adam G. Clinical relevance of cranial CT under emergency conditions—basic neuroradiologic investigations. Fortschr Röntgenstr 175 2003; 654-662
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Myers JC, Okoye MI, Kiple D, Kimmerle EH, Reinhard KJ. Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging in post-mortem examinations: elucidation and identification of cranial and facial fractures in victims of homicide utilizing 3-D computerized imaging reconstruction techniques. Int J Legal Med 113 1999; 33-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dorenbeck U, Finkenzeller T, Hill K, Feuerbach S, Link J. Volume-artifact reduction technique by spiral CT in the anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae. Comparison with conventional cranial CT. Röfo 172 2000; 342-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar