Primary reconstruction of depressed skull fracture - The changing scenario

Abstract

Approximately 25% of all skull fractures are compound and merit immediate attention. Inadvertently fracture segments are removed in emergency to worsen the cosmetic problem. To analyze the benefit of primary reconstruction of depressed fracture and compare the various options available today. Thirty two patients underwent primary fracture reconstruction, from a study period of Feb2005 to Nov 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. The various techniques adopted by the author like simple elevation, apposition by nylon suture; or rigid fixation by titanium and absorbable mini plate were undertaken. Twenty two patients were male and ten were female. Eighteen (56%) cases underwent titanium miniplate fixation and eleven (34%) apposition using nylon sutures. In two cases simple elevation of fracture segments was carried out and in one fixation with absorbable (Poly-L- lactide) miniplate, was performed. Infection and Plate rejection were not encountered in this study. Cosmetic deformity correction to acceptable level was achieved better with miniplate. Primary reconstruction of fracture segment should be attempted as and when possible. Even in India, titanium mini plate is cost effective and better option to any other available measures.

Keywords

Head injury - depressed fracture - reconstruction - good outcome

• References

• 1 Kalyanaraman S, Ramamurthi B: An analysis of 3000 cases of head injury. Paper presented at the fifth Asian Federation Congress of the International College of Surgeons, 1973.
• 2 Duman H, Deveci M, Uygur F. et al Reconstruction of contour and anterior wall defects of frontal bone with a porous polyethylene implant. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27 1999; 298-301
• 3 Cabbabe EB, Shively RE, Malik P. Cranioplasty for traumatic deformities of the frontoorbital area. Ann Plast Surg 13 1984; 175-184
• 4 Cooper PR. Skull fracture and traumatic cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. In Cooper PR. (Ed): Head injury. 3d. ed 1993. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 115-136
• 5 Vollmer DG, Dacey RG, Jane JA. Cranio-cerebral-trauma. In Joynt RJ. (Ed): Clinical Neurology. 3 1991. Lippincott; Philadelphia: 1-79
• 6 Qureshi NH. Skull fracture. E- Medicine update; April 13, 2006: online accessed on 12 Dec 2007.
• 7 Gade GF, Becker DP, Miller JD. et al Pathology and pathophysiology of head injury. In Youmans JR. (Ed): Neurological Surgery. 3d. ed. 1990. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1965-2016
• 8 Mottaran R, Guarda-Nardini L, Fusetti S. et al Reconstruction of a large post-traumatic cranial defect with a customized titanium plaque. Neurosurg Sci 48 2004; 143-147
• 9 Kuttenberger JJ, Hardt N. Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micromesh systems. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 2001; 75-81
• 10 Jennett B Miller JD. Infection after depressed fracture of skull, implications for management of non-missile injuries. J Neurosurg 36 1972; 333
• 11 Ebel H, Schillinger G, Walteret C. et al Titanium Clamps for Re fixation of Bone Fragments in the Repair of Depressed Skull Fractures: Technical Note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 43 2000; 212-214
• 12 Setsuko N, Masamitsu A, Takehisa T. et al Cranioplasty using titanium miniplates for the repair of a comminuted fracture: Report of two cases. Jap Jour Neurosurg 03 1994; 259-262
• 13 Stanley Jr RB, Shih T. Reconstruction of large fronto-orbital defects with Dacron polyurethane custom prosthesis and autogenous bone. Laryngoscope 96 1986; 604-608
• 14 Wörner B., Lange M., Herzog A.. et al A new method for surgical repair of depression fractures of the cranial vault and frontal sinus with rivet-like titanium clamps. Neurosurg Rev 24 2001; 83-87
• 15 Stendel R., Krischek B, Pietila TA. Biodegradable implants in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 143 2001; 237-243