A preliminary audit investigating remedy reactions including adverse events in routine homeopathic practice

Homeopathic medicines are regarded as safe but practitioners report several types of healing or remedy reactions including aggravations, new symptoms and recurrence of old symptoms, some of which could be regarded as side effects or unwanted effects. Some remedy reactions may be regarded as adverse events.

Audit Questions: Do such reactions occur within our unit, and if so, how frequently? Do patients regard these events as “adverse”?

Methods: The audit was carried out in the Bristol Homeopathic Hospital Outpatient Department. All patients were given a questionnaire to complete when at their first follow-up consultation approx 6–10 weeks after their first appointment. One hundered and sixteen patients were sampled over a 2-month period.

Results: Reactions were frequent: 28 out of the 116 (24%) patients, experienced an aggravation. Thirteen patients (11%) reported an adverse event even though 5 of those were patients who also reported an aggravation followed by an overall improvement of their symptoms. Thirty-one patients described new symptoms (27%) and 21(18%), a return of old symptoms. Those experiencing the latter appeared to have better outcomes.

Conclusions: Remedy reactions are common in clinical practice; some patients experience them as adverse events. Systematically recording side effects would facilitate our understanding of these reactions and would enable standards to be set for audit of information and patient care.

Keywords

audit - aggravations - old symptoms - adverse events

• References

• 1 Potier J.P. Bromate intoxication due to the ingestion of a dose prescribed by a homeopathist. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 2978-2979.
• 2 Stevens W.J. Thallium intoxication caused by a homoeopathic preparation. Toxicol Eur Res 1978; 1: 317-320.
• 3 Chakraborti D., Mukherjee S.C., Saha K.C., Chowdhury U.K., Rahman M.M., Sengupta M.K. Arsenic toxicity from homeopathic treatment. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41: 963-967.
• 4 Aberer W., Strohal R. Homoeopathic preparations--severe adverse effects, unproven benefits. Dermatologica 1991; 182: 253
• 5 Kuenzli S., Grimaitre M., Krischer J., Saurat J.H., Calza A.M., Borradori L. Childhood bullous pemphigoid. report of a case with life-threatening course during homeopathy treatment. Pediatr Dermatol 2004; 21: 160-163.
• 6 Cardinali C., Francalanci S., Giomi B., Caproni M., Sertoli A., Fabbri P. Contact dermatitis from Rhus toxicodendron in a homeopathic remedy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 150-151.
• 7 Taylor M.A., Reilly D., Llewellyn-Jones R.H., McSharry C., Aitchison T.C. Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. BMJ 2000; 321: 471-476.
• 8 Lewith G.T., Watkins A.D., Hyland M.E. et al. Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite. double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2002; 324: 520
• 9 Hyland M.E., Lewith G.T. Oscillatory effects in a homeopathic clinical trial. an explanation using complexity theory, and implications for clinical practice. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 145-149.
• 10 Dantas F., Rampes H. Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. Br Homeopath J 2000; 89 (Suppl. 01) S35-S38.
• 11 Grabia S., Ernst E. Homeopathic aggravations. a systematic review of randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 92-98.
• 12 Thompson E, Douglas D, Montgomery A, Reilly D. A pilot randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial of individual homeopathy for symptoms of eostrogen withdrawal in breast cancer survivors. Submitted for publication May 2004.
• 13 Chapman E. Placebo reaction versus homeopathic effect: how to distinguish the two. AJHM 2002;(Autumn).