Measuring the effectiveness of homeopathic care through objective and shared indicators
Received01 December 2009
revised26 July 2011
accepted26 July 2011
20 December 2017 (online)
Objective: To test a methodology to evaluate, at population level, the effectiveness of homeopathic treatment through standard objective public health indicators.
Methods and settings: Indicators of hospitalization and drug use were obtained from the Health Statistical Documentation System of Tuscany for two homeopathic centers in the Local Health Authority of Pisa, Italy. We compared homeopathic users with the general population in the same area and by comparing patients before and after homeopathic treatment.
Results: The homeopathic patients used less drugs than the reference population, this effect was more evident for patients with repeated homeopathic consultations. A significant decrease in drug use was found on comparing the same patients before and after homeopathic treatment. Hospitalization indicators tended to favour patients who had received homeopathic treatment but were not always statistically significant.
Conclusions: This paper demonstrates a new methodological approach to assess the effectiveness of a therapeutic modality, without ad-hoc clinical trials. This methodology can be used by public health institutions in which non-conventional medicines are integrated into the public health care system.
- 1 De Lange De Klerk E.S.M., Blommers J., Kuik D., Bezemer P., Feenstra L. Effect of homeopathic medicines on daily burden of symptoms in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infection. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1329-1332.
- 2 Lewith G., Watkins A., Hyland M., Shaw S., Broomfield J., Dolan G. et al. Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite: double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Med J 2002; 324: 520-523.
- 3 Frei H., Everts R., von Ammon K., Walther D., Hsu-Schmitz S.-F., Collenberg M. et al. Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. Eur J Pediatr 2005; 164 (12) 758-767.
- 4 Taylor M., Reilly D., Llewellyn-Jones R., Mc Sharry C., Aitchison T. Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. Br Med J 2000; 321: 471-476.
- 5 Frei H., Everts R., von Ammon K., Kaufmann F., Walther D., Hsu Schmitz S.-F. et al. Randomised controlled trials of homeopathy in hyperactive children: treatment procedure leads to a unconventional study design. Homeopathy 2007; 96 (01) 35-41.
- 6 Colin P. Homeopathy and respiratory allergies: a series of 147 studies. Homeopathy 2006; 95 (02) 68-72.
- 7 Launsø L., Kimby C., Henningsen I., Fønnebø V. An exploratory retrospective study of people suffering from hypersensitivity illnesses who attend medical or classical homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy 2006; 95 (02) 73-80.
- 8 Witt C., Keil T., Selim D., Roll S., Vance W., Wegscheider K. et al. Outcome and costs of homeopathic and conventional treatment strategies: a comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders. Complement Ther Med 2005; 13 (02) 79-86.
- 9 Witt C., Ludtke R., Baur R., Willich S. Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC-Public Health 2005; 5: 115.
- 10 Walach H. Magic of signs: a nonlocal interpretation of homeopathy. J Sci Explor 1999; 13 (02) 291-315.
- 11 Walach H. The complementary model of brain-body relationship. Med Hypotheses 2005; 65 (02) 380-388.
- 12 Holmes D., Murray S., Perron A., Rail G. Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: truth, power and fascism. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2006; 4 (03) 180-186.
- 13 Laungharne R. Evidence-based medicine, user involvement and the post-modern paradigm. Psychiatr Bull 1999; 23 (11) 641-643.
- 14 Chaplin M.F. The memory of water: an overview. Homeopathy 2007; 96 (03) 143-150.
- 15 Hofmeyr G., Piccioni V., Blauhof P. Postpartum homeopathic Arnica montana: a potency finding pilot study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 44 (12) 619-621.
- 16 Robinson K. Therapeutic abortion induced by Pulsatilla. J Am Inst Homeopath 1989; 82 (03) 104.
- 17 Milgrom L. Is homeopathy possible?. J Roy Soc Promot Health 2006; 126 (05) 211-218.
- 18 Linde K., Melchart D. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med 1998; 4 (04) 371-388.
- 19 Hill C., Doyon F. Review of randomized trials of homeopathy. Revue d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique 1990; 38: 139-147.
- 20 Kleijnen J., Knipschild P., ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homeopathy. Br Med J 1991; 302: 316-323.
- 21 Jonas W., Kaptchuk T., Linde K. A critical overview of homeopathy. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138 (05) 393-399.
- 22 Relton C., O’Cathain A., Thomas K. ‘Homeopathy’: untangling the debate. Homeopathy 2008; 97 (03) 152-155.
- 23 Buiatti E., Adamoli R., Baccetti S., Berti S., Chiarugi C., Cuttini M. et al. Medicine Non Convenzionali in Toscana. Agenzia Regionale di Sanità in Toscana; 2003.
- 24 Rossi E., Baccetti S., Firenzuoli F., Belvedere K. Homeopathy and complementary medicine in Tuscany, Italy: integration in the public health system. Homeopathy 2008; 97 (02) 70-75.
- 25 ARS web site. http://www.mad.it/ars/html/sezione.asp?ID=45 1/12/ 2009
- 26 Rossi E., Crudeli L., Endrizzi C., Garibaldi D. Cost-benefit evaluation of homeopathic versus conventional therapy in respiratory diseases. Homeopathy 2009; 98 (01) 2-10.
- 27 Rossi E., Endrizzi C., Panozzo M., Bianchi A., Fré D. Homeopathy in the public health system: a seven-year observational study at Lucca Hospital (Italy). Homeopathy 2009; 98 (03) 142-148.
- 28 Endrizzi C., Rossi E. Patient compliance with homeopathic therapy. Homeopathy 2006; 95 (04) 206-214.
- 29 Condizioni di salute e ricorso ai servizi sanitari. http://www.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20090821_00/testointegrale.pdf 2005