Homeopathy 2013; 102(02): 114-122
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2013.01.003
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2013

Homeopathy – between tradition and modern science: remedies as carriers of significance

Yannis Almirantis

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received18 July 2012
revised29 October 2012

accepted29 January 2013

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

The healing potential and description of homeopathic remedies, as determined in homeopathic pathogenic trials (HPTs) and verified by medical experience, are often found to be meaningfully connected with the symbolic content attributed to the original materials (tinctures, metals etc) through tradition or modern semantics. Such a connection is incompatible with a biomolecular mechanistic explanation of the healing action of remedies. The physiological effects of crude substances are often similar to the symptoms of illnesses cured by the corresponding homeopathic remedy. This is considered a manifestation of the similia principle. Evidence is brought here that in several cases the inverse situation occurs, with the healing properties of the crude substance and those of its homeopathic preparation partially coinciding, the remedy usually having broader healing properties.

The existence of these two possibilities in the relationship of medicinal actions of remedy and the crude substance, offers evidence in favor of a direct involvement of the level of significances in the mechanism underlying the homeopathic phenomenon. Finally, an experimental methodology is proposed, which may bring the result of double-blind randomized studies for homeopathic remedies closer to the reported performance of homeopathy in real life medical practice. If successful, this method would be a further indication of a non-local, significance-related interpretation of homeopathy.

  • References

  • 1 Walach H. Magic of signs: a nonlocal interpretation of homeopathy. Br Homeopath J 2000; 89: 127-140.
  • 2 Milgrom L.R. Patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part1: a qualitative, non-local metaphor for homeopathy based on quantum theory. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 239-248.
  • 3 Walach H., Jonas W.B., Ives J., vanWijk R., Weingärtner O. Research on homeopathy: state of the art. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11: 813-829.
  • 4 Walach H. Entangled-and tied in knots! Practical consequences of an entangled model for homeopathic research and practice. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 96-99.
  • 5 Milgrom L.R. Conspicuous by its absence: the memory of water, macro-entanglement, and the possibility of homeopathy. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 209-219.
  • 6 Milgrom L.R. The sound of two hands clapping: could homeopathy work locally and non-locally?. Homeopathy 2005; 94: 100-104.
  • 7 Various authors. The memory of water. Homeopathy 2007; 96: 141-230.
  • 8 Milgrom L.R. A new geometrical description of entanglement and the curative homeopathic process. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 14: 329-339.
  • 9 Milgrom L.R. Toward a topological description of the therapeutic process. J Altern Complement Med 2010; 16: 1329-1341.
  • 10 Milgrom L.R. Toward a topological description of the therapeutic process: part 2. Practitioner and patient perspectives of the “journey to cure”. J Altern Complement Med 2012; 18: 187-199.
  • 11 Penrose R. Shadows of the mind. Oxford, New York, Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1994.
  • 12 Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever. Nature 1999; 398: 189-190.
  • 13 Aspect A. To be or not to be local. Nature 2007; 446: 866-867.
  • 14 Mermin N.D. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory. Phys Today April, 1985: 38-47.
  • 15 Atmanspacher H., Romer H., Walach H. Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations Phys 2002; 32: 379-406.
  • 16 Lucadou Wv, Römer H., Walach H. Synchronistic phenomena as entanglement correlations in generalized quantum theory. J Conscious Stud 2007; 14: 50-74.
  • 17 Wolfgang P., Jung C.G. The interpretation of nature and the psyche. Random House; 1955.
  • 18 Vithoulkas G. Essences of Materia Medica. International Academy of Classical Homeopathy; 1988.
  • 19 Berthelot M. Collection des Anciens Alchimistes Grecs. 1887. Paris.
  • 20 Donaldson L.J., Cavanagh J., Rankin J. The dancing plague: a public health conundrum. Public Health 1997; 111 (04) 201-204.
  • 21 Martino Ed. The land of remorse: a study of southern Italian Tarantism. London: Free Association; 2005.
  • 22 Gray B. Homeopathy: science or myth?. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books; 2000.
  • 23 Vithoulkas G. Materia Medica Viva, Narayana Publishers (partially published).
  • 24 Freud S. A general introduction to psychoanalysis. Translated by G.S. Hall New York: Boni and Liveright Publishers; 1920.
  • 25 Petocz A. Freud, psychoanalysis, and symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  • 26 Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
  • 27 Almirantis Y. The paradox of the planetary metals. J Scientific Exploration 2005; 19: 31-42.
  • 28 Sheldrake R. A new science of life: the hypothesis of formative causation. London: Paladin Grafton Books; 1981.
  • 29 Sheldrake R. The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. Harper Collins; 1988.
  • 30 Josephson B.D., Pallikari-Viras F. Biological utilization of quantum non-locality?. Foundations Phys 1991; 21: 197-207.