Pediatric homeopathy: A prospective observational survey based on parent proxy-reports of their children's health-related Quality of Life in six European countries and Brazil

Background: Many European citizens regularly consult homeopathic doctors. Especially for children there is very little data available about the reasons they visit a homeopathic doctor. What are the expectations of the parents consulting a Homeopath MD with their child, who are they and last but not least are they satisfied with their initiative? This study including 773 children from six European countries and Brazil is aimed to look at parent-proxy satisfaction with homeopathic treatment prescribed for their children by a homeopathic doctor after a follow-up of two months. The questionnaire was developed from the methodology used in a survey of adults published in 2002.

Method: An initial questionnaire included demographic information and questions for assessing health-related Quality of Life (QoL). A follow-up questionnaire collected data on changes in QoL.

Results: The demographic characteristics of respondents showed more male children (53.1%) but more female parent-proxies (93.4%). 73.7% of respondents had previously tried conventional treatments; 26.3% non-conventional approaches. Satisfaction with the medical homeopathic consultation was high. Reported differences between baseline and final QoL ondexes are positive for all four studied conditions. It range from 3.206 to 10.188. Considering 7% as a reference value for “minimal clinical difference”, this is reached for 2 on 4 conditions (8.473 and 10.188). Changes in complaint limitations visual scales are positive, even if uncertain for skin complaints and influenced parents satisfaction. Conclusions on clinical impact must be cautious. 4.2% of patients experienced side-effects which they attribute to homeopathic treatment. 10.1% of patients reported significant aggravation at the beginning of homeopathic treatment, 19% slight aggravation of symptoms.

Conclusions: The satisfaction of parents using a medical homeopathic approach for their children is linked to the perceived competence of the doctor homeopath, the perceived improvement of the main complaint limitations and the completeness of the received information.

Keywords

Homeopathy - Children - Parent-proxy quality of live evaluation - Prospective survey

• References

• 1 How are European patients safeguarded when using complementary and alternative medicine? Jurisdictions, supervision and reimbursement status in the EEA area (Eu and EFTA) and Switzerland. CAM-CANCER project funded by the European Commission within the 5th Framework Programme “Quality of Life” 10-2005 http://cam-cancer.org.
• 2 Guadagnoli E., Mc Nail B.J. Outcomes research: hope for the future or latest rage. Inquiry 1994; 31: 14-24.
• 3 Rapier C.M. An introduction to Outcomes Research. Surrey: Brookwood Medical Publications; 1996.
• 4 Bitzer. et al. Patient satisfaction in pediatric outpatient settings from the parents’ perspective – The Child ZAP: A psychometrically validated standardized questionnaire. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 347.
• 5 Vani. et al. Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL^TM 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Live Outcomes January 2007; 5: 2.
• 6 Anelli M., Scheepers L., Sermeus G., Van Wassenhoven M. Homeopathy and health related Quality of Life: A survey in six European countries. Homeopathy 2002; 91: 18-21.
• 7 Mc Horney C., Ware J.E., Roger W., Raczek A., Lu J.F.R. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 1992; 30: 253-265.
• 8 Juniper E.F., Guyatt G.H., Willan A., Griffith L.E. Determning a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 47 (01) 1994; 81-87.
• 9 Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G.H. Measurement of health status, ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407-415.
• 10 Tubach F., Ravaud P., Baron G., Falissard B., Logeart I., Bellamy N. et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 29-33.
• 11 Hill P.B., Hoare J., Lau-Gillard P., Rybnicek J., Mathie R.T. Pilot study of the effect of individualised homeopathy on the pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis in dogs. Veterinary Rec 2009; March 21: 364-370.