International Journal of Epilepsy 2016; 03(01): 42-62
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijep.2015.12.048
Abstracts
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2017

Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) yield of single and multiple dipole clusters in patients with drug refractory epilepsy (DRE)

K Vibhin Viswanathan
a   National Brain Research Centre, India
,
Kamal Bharti
a   National Brain Research Centre, India
,
R Bhargavi
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
,
P Sarat Chandra
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
,
G Ajay
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
,
T Madhavi
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
,
B Chandrashekar
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
,
M Tripathi
b   All India Institute of Medical Science, India
› Institutsangaben

Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
12. Mai 2018 (online)

Introduction: Epilepsy is characterized by the presence of epileptic discharges, mainly in the form of Spikes and Sharp waves transients in electroencephalography (EEG). Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has the advantage that it can record potentials which is otherwise not possible to record in EEG when the discharges have a tangential dipole/orientation MEG also has the advantage of having greater temporal and spatial resolution than other available methods and that too noninvasively.

Purpose: Drug refractory epilepsy(DRE) is the most common reason for referring patients to magnetoencephalographic evaluation. Source localization of Magnetoencephalographic spikes and sharp wave dipole clustering is supposed to represent the focal epileptic source. The data of this study shows yield of magnetoencephalographic dipole clustering (in many forms) in focal intractable epilepsy.

The present study addresses the following questions

  1. 1. Is there multiple or a single source of epileptogenicity?

  2. 2. What is the possibility of expecting a scattered region of Source Localization in focal or secondary generalized epilepsy?

Procedure: Patients diagnosed with epilepsy based on clinical findings underwent simultaneous MEG (306 Sensors) and EEG (64 Channels).

Data acquisition was performed with 1Khz sampling rate.

Band pass filter was 0.3–330 Hz.

Source localization was performed with equivalent dipole modelling.

Spherical head modelling was used in MEG source localization and BEM head model for EEG.

Methods:

Patients:

  • • This study was performed in 310 patients diagnosed with focal or Secondary Generalized DRE based on Clinical features and other noninvasive investigations (Video EEG, 3T MRI, SPECT, PET).

  • • 128 Cases were analyzed.

  • • The patients underwent MEG study of average duration 2 hrs, both awake and sleepfulness.

  • • The patients recruited were between the age 3–60 years.

  • • The patients were on their maximum allowed and tolerable dosage of medicines.

We retrospectively analysed with Equivalent Current Dipole Model in DANA software and Moving dipole and sLORETA analysis in CURRY Software, the average 2 h MEG data of patients with intractable epilepsy who were referred to MEG Facility at National Brain Research Centre for MEG assessment.

Findings

Findings

Ratio

Percentage%

Spikes, sharpwaves or slow waves

286/310

92.25

Single dipole clustering

63/128

49.21

Multiple dipole clustering

39/128

30.46

Multiple clustering with scattering

15/128

11.71

Scattered

10/128

7.8

Total clustering

118/128

92.18

Results: This study demonstrates the high yield of MEG in DRE – focal in the form of Dipole Clusters, both single Cluster and Multiple Clusters.