Efficacy of periprocedural vs extended use of antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains – A randomized trial^[*]

Abstract

Background

External ventricular drains (EVD) are considered gold standard for intracranial pressure monitoring. Antibiotics are routinely administered to patients with EVD for extended duration, however, no conclusive evidence supports this practice.

Aim

To compare the efficacy of periprocedural versus extended use of antibiotics, in patients requiring external ventricular drains.

Patients and methods

This is a three year prospective study starting from 1st Jan 2002. All patients who required EVDs as part of their treatment protocol were randomized into two groups, group A who received periprocedural antibiotics and group B who received, antibiotics for extended duration, while EVD was in situ. Patients with open head injuries, pre-existing CNS infection, who required EVD for second time, breach in surgical technique and who had antibiotics for other reasons were excluded from this study. A standard protocol was used to insert and monitor EVDs. No EVD was left in situ for a period more than 144 h. Cerebrospinal fluid cultures were sent on day 0, 1, 3 and 5. On removal, EVD tip was sent for culture. Group A received two doses of intravenously administered ceftazidime. Group B received ceftazidime extended till removal of EVD.

Results

Both groups were well matched in number of patients, age, sex, duration of ventriculostomy Closed head injury was the most common indication (42.86%) for ventriculostomy. One patient in group A (6.67%) and two patients in group B (7.40%) had ventriculostomy related infection with overall infection rate of 7.14%.

Conclusion

Our observation, despite being underpowered, definitely points towards limiting the antibiotic prophylaxis to only periprocedural period for clean neurosurgical procedures like ventriculostomy.

Keywords

Antibiotics - External ventricular drains - Intracranial pressure - Ventriculostomy related infection

^* This study was part of treatment protocol and was not granted from any other source. This manuscript was not presented at any meeting.

• References

• 1 Marshall L.F., Smith R.W., Shapiro H.M.. The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries, significance of intra cranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 1979; 50: 20-25
• 2 O'Sullivan M.G., Statham P.F., Jones P.A.. Role of intracranial pressure monitoring in severely head injured patients without signs of intracranial hypertension on initial computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 46-50
• 3 Wyler A.R., Kelly W.A.. Use of antibiotics with external ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 1972; 37: 185-187
• 4 Smith R.W., Alksne J.F.. Infections complicating the use of external ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 1976; 44: 567-570
• 5 Alleyene C.H., Hassan M., Zabramski J.M.. The efficacy and cost of prophylactic and periprocedural antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains. Neurosurg 2000; 47 (05) 1124-1129
• 6 Aucoin P.J., Kotilainen H.R., Gantz N.M., Davidson R., Kellogg P., Stone B.. Intracranial pressure monitors: epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 1986; 80: 369-376
• 7 Franges E.Z., Beideman M.E.. Infections related to intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosci Nurs 1988; 20: 94-103
• 8 Haines S.J.. Duration of intracranial pressure monitoring does not predict daily risk of infectious complications. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 430-431
• 9 Holloway K.I., Barnes T., Choi S.. et al Ventriculostomy infections. The effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 419-424
• 10 Knater R.K., Weiner L.B., Patti A.M., Robson L.K.. Infectious complications and duration of intracranial pressure monitoring. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 837-839
• 11 Khanna R.K., Rosenblum M.L., Rock J.P., Malik G.M.. Prolonged external ventricular drainage with percutaneous long-tunnel ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 791-794
• 12 Mayhall C.G., Archer N.H., Lamb V.A.. et al Ventriculostomy-related infections: a prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 553-559
• 13 Narayan R.K., Kishore P.R.S., Becker D.P.. et al Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982; 56: 650-659
• 14 Ohrstrom J.K., Skou J.K., Ejlersten T., Kosteljanetz M.. Infected ventriculostomy: bacteriology and treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989; 10: 67-69
• 15 Paramore C.G., Turner D.A.. Relative risks of ventriculostomy infection and morbidity. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 127: 79-84
• 16 Lucey M.A., Myburgh J.A.. Antibiotic prophylaxis for external ventricular drains – can morbidity be reduced. Crit Casr Resusc 2003; 05 (03) 169-170
• 17 Wong G.C., Poon W.S., Yu L.M., Lyon D., Lam J.M.K.. Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 2002; 73: 759-761
• 18 Hayat A., Rodrigues D., Crawford P., Mendelow D.. External ventricular drains – can morbidity be reduced. Pak J Neural Sci 2009; 04 (01) 1-3
• 19 Winfield J.A., Rosenthal P., Kanter R.K., Casella G.. Duration of intracranial pressure monitoring does not predict daily risk of infections complications. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 424-431
• 20 Stenager E., Gerner-Smidt P., Kock Jneson C.. Ventriculostomy related infections: an epidemiological study. Acta Neurochir 1986; 83: 20-23
• 21 Rosner M.J., Becker D.P.. ICP monitoring: complications and associated factors. Clin Neurosurg 1976; 23: 494-519
• 22 Ratilal B.O., Costa J., Sampaio C.. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical introduction of intracranial ventricular shunts. Evid Based Child Health 2006; 01: 1304-1341