Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2012; 09(01): 33-39
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnt.2012.04.007
Original article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Role of repeat CT scans in the management of traumatic brain injury

Ramesh S. Doddamani
a   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
,
Sunil K. Gupta
a   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
,
Navneet Singla
a   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
,
Sandeep Mohindra
a   Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
,
Paramjeet Singh
b   Department of Radio-diagnosis, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
› Institutsangaben

Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

12. März 2012

08. April 2012

Publikationsdatum:
05. April 2017 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background

In trauma practice, there are no guidelines on the necessity or value of repeat CT scan. The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of serial CTs in demonstrating changes in intracranial lesions and the influence on management.

Methods

In this study, 201 patients of traumatic brain injury were followed with serial CT scans for a maximum of up to 5 scans. The presence of different types of intracranial lesions at each CT scan as well as the evolution of lesions was recorded. The development of new lesions was noted. The management decisions at the time of each CT was detailed.

Results

Progression of lesion was seen most often in patients with mixed lesions (21.8%). New lesions were seen in 5.5% of patients at CT-2 and in 5.8% at CT-3. Out of total 201 patients, 47 (23%) had change in management. 26 (55%) decisions of change in management were based upon clinical deterioration and 21 (45%) upon radiological changes only. A higher incidence of surgical intervention was seen in patients who had the first CT scan within 6 h of initial trauma. However, a few patients in whom the first CT scan was 6 h after trauma as well as some patients in whom CT scan was repeated as a routine without any clinical deterioration also had a change in their management.

Conclusions

Repeat CT scans resulted in management changes even in patients with no clinical deterioration and thus may be of value in detecting changes at an early stage.