Download PDF
veterinär spiegel 2018; 28(03): 109-116
DOI: 10.1055/a-0600-6210
Nutztiere & Pferde
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Selektives Trockenstellen in Milchviehbetrieben – eine Alternative zur bisherigen Routine?

Martin tho Seeth
,
Volker Krömker
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

In Zeiten zunehmender Diskussion über Sinn und Unsinn von Antibiotikaeinsätzen in der Nutztiergesundheit wird natürlich auch die Verwendung von antibiotischen Trockenstellern durchleuchtet. Wir zeigen Fakten und einen Ausblick auf ein mögliches neues Trockenstellmanagement.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Berry EA, Hillerton JE. The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2512-2520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bradley AJ, Breen JE, Payne B. et al. A comparison of broad-spectrum and narrow-spectrum dry cow therapy used alone and in combination with a teat sealant. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 692-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bradley AJ, Green MJ. The importance of the nonlactating period in the epidemiology of intramammary infection and strategies for prevention. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2004; 20: 547-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burvenich C, Bannerman DD, Lippolis JD. et al. Cumulative physiological events influence the inflammatory response of the bovine udder to Escherichia coli infections during the transition period. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90 (E. Suppl.): E39-E54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Capuco AV, Akers RM, Smith JJ. Mammary growth in Holstein cows during the dry period: quantification of nucleic acids and histology. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 477-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Capuco AV, Akers RM. Mammary involution in dairy animals. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1999; 4: 137-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Godden S, Rapnicki P, Stewart S. et al. Effectiveness of an internal teat seal in the prevention of new intramammary infections during the dry and early-lactation periods in dairy cows when used with a dry cow intramammary antibiotic. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 3899-3911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Green MJ, Green LE, Medley GF. et al. Influence of dry period bacterial intramammary infection on clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2589-2599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hogeveen HK, Huijps K, Lam TJ. Economic aspects of mastitis: new developments. N Z Vet J 2011; 59: 16-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hurley WL. Mammary gland function during involution. J Dairy Sci 1998; 72: 1637-1646
    Google Scholar
  • 11 IDF. Economic consequences of mastitis. In: Bulletin of the International Diary Federation. Brussels: 2005: 395
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Kiesner KN, Wente O, Krömker V. et al. Selection of cows for treatment at dry-off on organic dairy farms. J Dairy Res 2016; 83: 468-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Krömker V, Bruckmaier RM, Frister H. et al. Kurzes Lehrbuch der Milchkunde und Milchhygiene. Stuttgart: Parey; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Krömker V, Grabowski NT, Friedrich J. New infection rate of bovine mammary glands after application of an internal teat seal at dry-off. J Dairy Res 2014; 81: 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Natzke RP. Elements of mastitis control. Elements of mastitis control. J Dairy Sci 1981; 64: 1431-1442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Oliver SP, Murinda SE, Jayarao BM. Impact of antibiotic use in adult dairy cows on antimicrobial resistance of veterinary and human pathogens: a comprehensive review. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011; 8: 337-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Oliver S, Sordillo L. Approaches to the Manipulation of Mammary Involution. J Dairy Sci 1998; 72: 1647-1664
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Østerås O. Mastitis epidemiology practical approaches and applications. Proc of the XXIV World Buiatrics Congr 2006; 203-215
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Rabee AR, Lean IJ. The effect of internal teat sealant products (Teatseal and Orbeseal) on intramammary infection, clinical mastitis, and somatic cell counts in lactating dairy cows: a meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96 (11) 6915-6931 doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Roy JM, Cameron PG, Keefe R. et al. Evaluation of selective antibiotic treatment at dry-off based on milk culture results using petrifilm™ on farm in low somatic cell count herds. Proc of the XXVII World Buiatrics Congr 2012; 82-83
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Smith A, Dodd FH, Neave FK. The effect of intramammary infection during the dry period on the milk production of the affected quarter at the start of the succeeding lactation. J Dairy Res 1968; 35: 287-290
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Smith KL, Todhunter DA. The physiology of mammary glands during the dry period and the relationship to infection. Proc 21st Annual Meeting National Mastitis Council. 1982
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Smith KL, Todhunter DA, Schoenberger PS. Environmental mastitis: cause, prevalence, prevention. J Dairy Sci 1985; 68: 1531-1553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Smith KL, Todhunter DA, Schoenberger PS. Environmental pathogens and intramammary infection during the dry period. J Dairy Sc 1985; 68: 402-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 tho Seeth M, Wente M, Paduch JH. et al. Different selective dry cow therapy concepts compared to blanket antibiotic dry cow treatment. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G 2017; 45 (06) 343-349
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Welty FK, Smith KL, Schanbacher FL. Lactoferrin concentration during involution of the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 1976; 59: 224-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wheelock JV, Smith A, Dodd FH. et al. Changes in the quantity and composition of mammary gland secretion in the dry period between lactations: I. The beginning of the dry period. J Dairy Res 1967; 34: 1-12
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar