Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157(02): 164-172
DOI: 10.1055/a-0639-5742
Review/Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Multiple Myeloma – Current Standards in Surgical Treatment

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Michael Kehrer
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn
,
Sebastian Koob
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn
,
Andreas Kehrer
2   Zentrum für Plastische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
,
Dieter Christian Wirtz
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn
,
Jan Schmolders
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 July 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Multiple myeloma is a haematological blood cancer in elderly patients, in which neoplastic cell populations cause osteolytic destruction in the bone skeleton. More than 50% of all patients sustain pathological fractures during the course of their disease. Of all malignant lesions of the spine, multiple myeloma is the most frequent spinal tumour and accounts for approximately 15% of all cases. 8 – 10% of the patients develop neurological deficits. In addition to systemic antineoplastic therapy, surgical treatment is often required in order to reconstruct and stabilise bone defects associated with multiple myeloma, as well as to address tumour-related complications.

Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed using the keywords “multiple myeloma” and “surgery” or “fracture”. This served to evaluate the available primary and secondary literature on the current status of the surgical therapy of multiple myeloma. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical studies and international recommendations for therapy were included – from 1975 until the spring of 2018.

Discussion Stabilising surgery is essential in order to retain and restore function and mobility in bone sections affected by myeloma and for tumour-related osseous defects due to pathological fracture or instability. Absolute and relative indications for surgical treatment are distinguished and are based on the extent and localisation of bone lesions, manifest fractures, accompanying side effects and complications such as neurological deficits and bone pain that is intractable to conservative treatment. The range of options in surgical treatment of myeloma-related bone damage within the upper and lower extremities ranges from hybrid stabilisation procedures combining bone cement and various implants, to conventional and modular tumour prostheses systems. In spinal surgery, minimally invasive procedures such as kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty, as well as selective decompressive operations, dorsal spinal fusion and vertebral replacement are performed in cases of osseous defects and related fractures or instabilities. The surgical treatment and time of operation is determined by the general individual risk profile and prognosis of the patient with multiple myeloma. The surgical approach should have the objective of a final and load stable solution for the patient, which takes into account the frequent long-term course of the disease. Radiotherapy is often recommended after surgery.

Conclusion In therapy of multiple myeloma, surgical treatment is often required in order to reduce distress and retain the function and flexibility of myeloma affected bone sections and the mobility and quality of life of the cancer patient. The range of surgical strategies is complex and demanding.

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Nair SR, Pearson SB. Images in clinical medicine. Pathologic fracture and lytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1874
  • 2 Melton 3rd LJ, Kyle RA, Achenbach SJ. et al. Fracture risk with multiple myeloma: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 487-493
  • 3 Utzschneider S, Schmidt H, Weber P. et al. Surgical therapy of skeletal complications in multiple myeloma. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1209-1213
  • 4 Durr HR, Wegener B, Krodel A. et al. Multiple myeloma: surgery of the spine: retrospective analysis of 27 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 320-324 discussion 325–326
  • 5 Kivioja AH, Karaharju EO, Elomaa I. et al. Surgical treatment of myeloma of bone. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28 A: 1865-1869
  • 6 Takei T, Coles M. Treatment of pathologic fracture and surgical value of prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Int Surg 1996; 81: 403-406
  • 7 Durr HR, Kuhne JH, Hagena FW. et al. Surgical treatment for myeloma of the bone. A retrospective analysis of 22 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 463-469
  • 8 Galasko CS. Multiple myeloma. Surgical stabilisation often provides good pain relief. BMJ 1997; 315: 186
  • 9 Dürr HR. Operative Therapie. In: Bartl R, Dietzfelbinger H. Hrsg. Manual des Tumorzentrums München, Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge. München: Zuckschwerdt; 2002: 143-145
  • 10 Menendez ME, Park KJ, Barnes CL. Early Postoperative Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With Multiple Myeloma. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 1645-1648
  • 11 Park KJ, Menendez ME, Mears SC. et al. Patients With Multiple Myeloma Have More Complications After Surgical Treatment of Hip Fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2016; 7: 158-162
  • 12 Kyle RA. Multiple myeloma: review of 869 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1975; 50: 29-40
  • 13 Groot MT, Huijgens PC, Wijermans PJ. et al. Costs of multiple myeloma and associated skeletal-related events in The Netherlands. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2004; 4: 565-572
  • 14 Hipp JA, Springfield DS, Hayes WC. Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 120-135
  • 15 Mendoza TR, Koyyalagunta D, Burton AW. et al. Changes in pain and other symptoms in patients with painful multiple myeloma-related vertebral fracture treated with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. J Pain 2012; 13: 564-570
  • 16 Krikler SJ. Multiple myeloma. Surgery is often more effective than analgesia for mechanical pain. BMJ 1997; 315: 186
  • 17 Alexa O, Veliceasa B. Multiple myeloma with bilateral humerus location. Case report. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2013; 117: 160-164
  • 18 Lee JW, Lee JE. Local radiotherapy for palliation in multiple myeloma patients with symptomatic bone lesions. Radiat Oncol J 2016; 34: 59-63
  • 19 Matuschek C, Ochtrop TA, Bolke E. et al. Effects of Radiotherapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis of a Single Institution. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10: 71
  • 20 Yaneva MP, Goranova-Marinova V, Goranov S. Palliative radiotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. J BUON 2006; 11: 43-48
  • 21 Lang K, Konig L, Bruckner T. et al. Stability of Spinal Bone Lesions in Patients With Multiple Myeloma After Radiotherapy – A Retrospective Analysis of 130 Cases. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2017; 17: e99-e107
  • 22 Schmaus MC, Neuhof D. [Radiotherapy for solitary plasmacytoma and multiple myeloma]. Radiologe 2014; 54: 551-555
  • 23 Chang SA, Lee SS, Ueng SW. et al. Surgical treatment for pathological long bone fracture in patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis of 22 cases. Chang Gung Med J 2001; 24: 300-306
  • 24 Damron TA, Sim FH, Shives TC. et al. Intercalary spacers in the treatment of segmentally destructive diaphyseal humeral lesions in disseminated malignancies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 324: 233-243
  • 25 Schmolders J, Koob S, Schepers P. et al. [The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS(R)) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery – Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients]. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 61-66
  • 26 Wedin R. Surgical treatment for pathologic fracture. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2001; 72: 1-29
  • 27 Natarajan MV, Mohanlal P, Bose JC. The role of limb salvage surgery and custom mega prosthesis in multiple myeloma. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73: 462-467
  • 28 Schmolders J, Koob S, Schepers P. et al. Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour-is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube?. Int Orthop 2017; 41: 423-428
  • 29 Bousbaa H, Bennani M, Elghoul N. et al. [Pertrochanterian fracture revealing multiple myeloma: how is it treated?]. Pan Afr Med J 2017; 27: 155
  • 30 Schmolders J, Koob S, Schepers P. et al. Lower limb reconstruction in tumor patients using modular silver-coated megaprostheses with regard to perimegaprosthetic joint infection: a case series, including 100 patients and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137: 149-153
  • 31 Latif T, Hussein MA. Advances in multiple myeloma and spine disease. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2005; 6: 228-233
  • 32 Donnarumma P, Tarantino R, Rullo M. et al. Surgery for vertebral involvement in multiple myeloma. J Neurosurg Sci 2018; 62: 10-15
  • 33 Baur A. Diagnostik des Plasmozytoms mit der MRT. Radiologie 2000; 40: 716-722
  • 34 Jonsson B, Sjostrom L, Jonsson jr. H. et al. Surgery for multiple myeloma of the spine. A retrospective analysis of 12 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 192-194
  • 35 Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroeder RJ. et al. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of pathological vertebral body fracture and deformity in multiple myeloma: a one-year follow-up. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 369-376
  • 36 Basile A, Cavalli M, Fiumara P. et al. Vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma with osteolysis or fracture of the posterior vertebral wall. Usefulness of a delayed cement injection. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40: 913-919
  • 37 Diamond TH, Hartwell T, Clarke W, Manoharan A. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for acute vertebral body fracture and deformity in multiple myeloma: a short report. Br J Haematol 2004; 124: 485-487
  • 38 Dmytriw AA, Talla K, Smith R. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the management of painful pathologic fracture in a multiple myeloma patient: Case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiol J 2017; 30: 80-83
  • 39 Dürr J, Rechl H. Operative Therapie. In: Bartl R, Dietzfelbinger H. Hrsg. Manual des Tumorzentrums München, Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge. München: Zuckschwerdt; 2012: 151-156