Horm Metab Res 2019; 51(02): 134-140
DOI: 10.1055/a-0713-1330
Endocrine Care
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Tests in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An External Validation Cohort

Stergios A. Polyzos
1   First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Aristidis Slavakis
2   Department of Biochemistry, Ippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Georgios Koumerkeridis
3   Siemens Healthineers, Athens, Greece
,
Panagiotis Katsinelos
4   Second Medical Clinic, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Jannis Kountouras
4   Second Medical Clinic, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 May 2018

accepted 21 August 2018

Publication Date:
01 October 2018 (online)

Abstract

The main aim of this study was the comparative evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test in distinguishing none/early (F0/F1) from significant/advanced (F2/F3) fibrosis in NAFLD patients, thereby providing an external validation cohort. Thirty-one patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 10 matched controls without NAFLD were prospectively enrolled. Serum hyaluronic acid (HA), aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), tissue inhibitor of metallo-proteinases (TIMP)-1, and biochemical tests were measured. NFS, FIB-4, APRI, and ELF were calculated. ELF, FIB-4, and APRI, but not NFS, were higher in F2/F3 than F0/F1 group. Specifically, ELF [area under the ROC curve (AUROC): 0.86±0.10; p=0.004) and APRI (AUROC: 0.86±0.07; p=0.005], but not NFS (AUROC: 0.68±0.12; p=0.16), and FIB-4 (AUROC: 0.71±0.11; p=0.10), could similarly discriminate F0/F1 from F2/F3 stage. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) were: a) for cut-off of APRI=0.5, 85.7%, 70.8%, 46.2%, and 94.4%, respectively, and b) for cut-off of ELF=9.0, 85.7%, 83.3%, 60.0%, and 95.2%, respectively. When ln(PIIINP) or TIMP-1 were combined with APRI, the combined AUROCs could distinguish F2/F3 from F0/F1, but without significantly higher accuracy compared with APRI alone. APRI could also distinguish patients with simple steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and those with from those without lobular inflammation and ballooning, findings warranting further research. In conclusions: The application of ELF test and APRI can distinguish F0/F1 from F2/F3 fibrosis stages in NAFLD patients.

Supplementary Material