Re-Evaluation of 162 Malignant Thyroid Nodules that were Interpreted as Benign Based on Ultrasound Findings

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to estimate the risk of malignant thyroid nodules being interpreted as benign based on ultrasound findings and to clarify the pathological features of these malignant nodules.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively re-evaluated ultrasound and pathological findings for 162 malignant thyroid nodules that were initially interpreted as benign based on ultrasound findings at Kuma Hospital between April 2012 and June 2015.

Results

The incidences of malignancy among “benign” thyroid nodules were 0.5% overall and 6.2% among resected nodules. In addition, 82.7% of thyroid nodules that were originally judged to have low or very low suspicion patterns were subsequently re-categorized as having high or intermediate suspicion patterns. The incidences of irregular margins (63.6%) and low echogenicity (36.4%) were higher than those of punctate microcalcification (17.9%) and the taller-than-wide shape (20.4%). Among microcarcinomas, the incidences were 65.7% for irregular margins and 51.4% for low echogenicity. Rim calcification with small extrusive soft tissue components and extrathyroidal extensions were not observed. After re-evaluation, 40.0% of papillary thyroid carcinomas remained benign based on their variants, such as the encapsulated, follicular, macrofollicular, and oxyphilic cell variants.

Conclusion

We conclude that more careful observation, especially for lesions with irregular margins and low echogenicity, can help improve the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid ultrasonography. Furthermore, greater care may decrease the incidence of malignancy among thyroid nodules with low or very low suspicion patterns. Some variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma can have benign ultrasound findings.

Key words

thyroid - sonography - risk of malignancy - interobserver variation

• References

• 1 Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE. et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016; 26: 1-133
• 2 Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, Franco C, Niedmann JP, Castro A. et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 1748-1751
• 3 Tae HJ, Lim DJ, Baek KH, Park WC, Lee YS, Choi JE. et al. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions in the management of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2007; 17: 461-466
• 4 Ito Y, Amino N, Yokozawa T, Ota H, Ohshita M, Murata N. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules in 900 patients: comparison among ultrasonographic, cytological, and histological findings. Thyroid 2007; 17: 1269-1276
• 5 Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH. et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation—multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008; 247: 762-770
• 6 Komatsu M, Hanamura N, Tsuchiya S, Seki T, Kuroda T. Preoperative diagnosis of the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: discrepancy between image and cytologic diagnoses. Radiat Med 1994; 12: 293-299
• 7 Smith-Bindman R, Lebda P, Feldstein VA, Sellami D, Goldstein RB, Brasic N. et al. Risk of Thyroid Cancer Based on Thyroid Ultrasound Imaging Characteristics: Results of a Population-Based Study. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1788-1796
• 8 Yi KH. The Revised 2016 Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules and Cancers: Differences from the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines. Endocrinol Metab 2016; 31: 373-378
• 9 Kobayashi K, Fujimoto T, Ota H, Hirokawa M, Yabuta T, Masuoka H et al. Calcifications in Thyroid Tumors on Ultrasonography: Calcification Types and Relationship with Histopathological Type. Ultrasound International Open 2018 (in press)
• 10 Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY. et al. Ultrasonography and the Ultrasound-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Consensus Statement and Recommendations. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12: 1-14
• 11 Wong KT, Ahuja AT. Ultrasound of thyroid cancer. Cancer Imaging 2005; 5: 157-166
• 12 Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S. US Features of Thyroid Malignancy: Pearls and Pitfalls. Radiographics 2007; 27: 847-860
• 13 Park CS, Kim SH, Jung SL, Kang BJ, Kim JY, Choi JJ. et al. Observer variability in the sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules. J Clin Ultrasound 2010; 38: 287-293
• 14 Choi SH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2010; 20: 167-172
• 15 Hambly NM, Gonen M, Gerst SR, Li D, Jia X, Mironov S. et al. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines for thyroid nodule biopsy: a model for establishment of practice standards. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 655-660
• 16 Fujimoto T, Hirokawa M, Ota H, Yabuta T, Fukushima M, Kobayashi K. et al. Characteristic sonographic features of cribriform papillary thyroid carcinoma for differentiation from other thyroid nodules. J Med Ultrason 2015; 42: 83-87
• 17 Kim HJ, Kwak MK, Choi IH, Jin SY, Park HK, Byun DW. et al. Utility of shear wave elastography to detect papillary thyroid carcinoma in thyroid nodules: efficacy of the standard deviation elasticity. Korean J Intern Med 2018; [Epub ahead of print]
• 18 Magri F, Chytiris S, Capelli V, Gaiti M, Zerbini F, Carrara R. et al. Comparison of elastographic strain index and thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology in 631 thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 4790-4797
• 19 Veyrieres JB, Albarel F, Lombard JV, Berbis J, Sebag F, Oliver C. et al. threshold value in Shear Wave elastography to rule out malignant thyroid nodules: a reality?. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3965-3972
• 20 Samir AE, Dhyani M, Anvari A, Prescott J, Halpern EF, Faquin WC. et al. Shear-wave elastography for the preoperative risk stratification of follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid: diagnostic accuracy and optimal measurement plane. Radiology. 2015; 277: 565-573
• 21 Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, Guerrisi I, Ricci P, Di Segni M. et al. Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q-elastography) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 1892-1898
• 22 Cantisani V, Bertolotto M, Weskott HP, Romanini L, Grazhdani H, Passamonti M. et al. Growing indications for CEUS: The kidney, testis, lymph nodes, thyroid, prostate, and small bowel. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 1675-1684
• 23 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med. 2018; 39: e2-e44
• 24 Dietrich CF, Averkiou M, Nielsen MB, Barr RG, Burns PN, Calliada F. et al. How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS). Ultrasound Int Open 2018; 4: E2-E15