Sportverletz Sportschaden 2019; 33(02): 82-86
DOI: 10.1055/a-0753-7953
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Differences in Ankle ROM Between Young Men and Women With a History of Ankle Sprain

Unterschiede in der Beweglichkeit des Sprunggelenks zwischen Männern und Frauen mit einer Sprunggelenksverletzung
Jung-Hyun Kim
Woosong University College of Health and Welfare, Dongdaejeon-ro, Korea, Republic of
,
Eun-Sook Sung
Woosong University College of Health and Welfare, Dongdaejeon-ro, Korea, Republic of
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Ankle injuries are the most common injuries in sports. However, very little is known about sex differences in ankle range of motion (ROM) between ankle joints with an episode of ankle sprain (ASE) and those without an episode of ankle sprain (non-ASE). This study aimed to investigate the differences of ankle ROM between men and women with and without ASE.

Methods 26 ASE had at least one episode of ankle injury in the last 6 to 12 months. 35 non-ASE served as a control group. All subjects were examined in supine position and the ankle ROM was calculated by the sum of inversion (IV), eversion (EV), plantar flexion (PF) and dorsiflexion (DF) in both ankles.

Results Subjects with ASE had a significantly smaller ROM regarding EV than non-ASE subjects in both ankles. The male subjects with ASE had a significantly higher EV and IV compared with the female subjects. However, ROM in PF was significantly lower among men compared with women who had ASE.

Conclusions Our findings suggest that the ROM after ASE affects PF in male and EV in female patients. This could point to sex-based prevention and rehabilitation after ankle injury.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Sprunggelenksverletzungen sind die häufigsten Verletzungen im Sport. Allerdings ist sehr wenig bekannt über geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede der Beweglichkeit des Fußgelenks (ROM) zwischen Sprunggelenken mit einer Episode einer Sprunggelenksverletzung (ASE) und einer ohne Sprunggelenksverletzung (non-ASE). Ziel dieser Untersuchung war die Untersuchung der Unterschiede der Sprunggelenksbeweglichkeit zwischen Männern und Frauen mit und ohne einer ASE.

Methoden 26 ASE hatten in den letzten 6 bis 12 Monaten mindestens eine Episode einer Sprunggelenksverletzung. 35 non-ASE dienten als Kontrollgruppe. Die Probanden wurden in Rückenlage untersucht und der ROM des Sprunggelenks wurde durch die Summe von Inversion (IV), Eversion (EV), Plantar-Flexion (PF) und Dorsal-Flexion (DF) in beiden Sprunggelenken berechnet.

Ergebnisse Probanden mit ASE hatte eine deutlich kleinere ROM in der EV als non-ASE in beiden Sprunggelenken. Die männlichen Probanden mit ASE hatten eine deutlich größere EV und IV als Frauen. Allerdings war die ROM in der PF bei den Männern deutlich geringer als bei Frauen, die eine ASE hatten.

Schlussfolgerungen Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass die ROM des Sprunggelenks nach ASE insbesondere die PF bei den Männern und die EV bei den Frauen betrifft. Dies könnte auf eine geschlechtsspezifische Prävention und Rehabilitation nach einer Sprunggelenksverletzung hinweisen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bahr R, Karlsen R, Lian O. et al. Incidence and mechanisms of acute ankle inversion injuries in volleyball. A retrospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 595-600
  • 2 Gomez E, DeLee JC, Farney WC. Incidence of injury in Texas girls' high school basketball. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 684-687
  • 3 Holmer P, Sondergaard L, Konradsen L. et al. Epidemiology of sprains in the lateral ankle and foot. Foot & ankle international 1994; 15: 72-74
  • 4 Safran MR, Benedetti RS, Bartolozzi AR. et al. Lateral ankle sprains: a comprehensive review: part 1: etiology, pathoanatomy, histopathogenesis, and diagnosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S429-S437
  • 5 Safran MR, Zachazewski JE, Benedetti RS. et al. Lateral ankle sprains: a comprehensive review part 2: treatment and rehabilitation with an emphasis on the athlete. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S438-S447
  • 6 Youdas JW, McLean TJ, Krause DA. et al. Changes in active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion after acute inversion ankle sprain. J Sport Rehabil 2009; 18: 358-374
  • 7 Dubin JC, Comeau D, McClelland RI. et al. Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a narrative literature review. J Chiropr Med 2011; 10: 204-219
  • 8 Bosien WR, Staples OS, Russell SW. Residual disability following acute ankle sprains. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37-A: 1237-1243
  • 9 Hintermann B, Boss A, Schafer D. Arthroscopic findings in patients with chronic ankle instability. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 402-409
  • 10 Taimela S, Kujala UM, Osterman K. Intrinsic risk factors and athletic injuries. Sports Med 1990; 9: 205-215
  • 11 Cordova ML, Sefton JM, Hubbard TJ. Mechanical joint laxity associated with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. Sports Health 2010; 2: 452-459
  • 12 Hiller CE, Nightingale EJ, Lin CW. et al. Characteristics of people with recurrent ankle sprains: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 660-672
  • 13 Hubbard TJ. Ligament laxity following inversion injury with and without chronic ankle instability. Foot & ankle international 2008; 29: 305-311
  • 14 Hubbard TJ, Cordova M. Mechanical instability after an acute lateral ankle sprain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1142-1146
  • 15 Hubbard TJ, Hertel J. Mechanical contributions to chronic lateral ankle instability. Sports Med 2006; 36: 263-277
  • 16 Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Chmielewski TL. et al. Dynamic postural control but not mechanical stability differs among those with and without chronic ankle instability. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: e137-e144
  • 17 Hertel J. Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability. J Athl Train 2002; 37: 364-375
  • 18 Verhagen RA, de Keizer G, van Dijk CN. Long-term follow-up of inversion trauma of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995; 114: 92-96
  • 19 Yeung MS, Chan KM, So CH. et al. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med 1994; 28: 112-116
  • 20 Denegar CR, Hertel J, Fonseca J. The effect of lateral ankle sprain on dorsiflexion range of motion, posterior talar glide, and joint laxity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32: 166-173
  • 21 Schaefer JL, Sandrey MA. Effects of a 4-week dynamic-balance-training program supplemented with Graston instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization for chronic ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil 2012; 21: 313-326
  • 22 Rome K, Cowieson F. A reliability study of the universal goniometer, fluid goniometer, and electrogoniometer for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Foot & ankle international 1996; 17: 28-32
  • 23 Bovens AM, van Baak MA, Vrencken JG. et al. Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18: 58-63
  • 24 Murphy DF, Connolly DA, Beynnon BD. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 13-29
  • 25 Beynnon BD, Renstrom PA, Alosa DM. et al. Ankle ligament injury risk factors: a prospective study of college athletes. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 213-220
  • 26 Zelisko JA, Noble HB, Porter M. A comparison of men's and women's professional basketball injuries. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10: 297-299
  • 27 Bell NS, Mangione TW, Hemenway D. et al. High injury rates among female army trainees: a function of gender?. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18: 141-146
  • 28 Hosea TM, Carey CC, Harrer MF. The gender issue: epidemiology of ankle injuries in athletes who participate in basketball. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 372: 45-49
  • 29 Baumhauer JF, Alosa DM, Renstrom AF. et al. A prospective study of ankle injury risk factors. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 564-570
  • 30 Hubbard TJ, Kaminski TW, Vander Griend RA. et al. Quantitative assessment of mechanical laxity in the functionally unstable ankle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 760-766
  • 31 Hubbard TJ, Kramer LC, Denegar CR. et al. Correlations among multiple measures of functional and mechanical instability in subjects with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 2007; 42: 361-366