Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79(04): 402-408
DOI: 10.1055/a-0834-8199
GebFra Science
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Induction of Labour in Growth Restricted and Small for Gestational Age Foetuses – A Historical Cohort Study

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch
Sven Kehl
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Christel Weiss
2   Medizinische Statistik, Biomathematik und Informationsverarbeitung, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Ulf Dammer
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Sebastian Berlit
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Thomas Große-Steffen
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Florian Faschingbauer
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Marc Sütterlin
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Matthias W. Beckmann
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Michael O. Schneider
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 13. Juni 2018

accepted 26. November 2018

Publikationsdatum:
12. April 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Purpose Induction of labour for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetus or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is common, but data are limited. The aim of this study was therefore to compare labour induction for SGA/IUGR with cases of normal foetal growth above the 10th percentile.

Material and Methods This historical multicentre cohort study included singleton pregnancies at term. Labour induction for SGA/IUGR (IUGR group) was compared with cases of foetal growth above the 10th percentile (control group). Primary outcome measure was caesarean section rate.

Results The caesarean section rate was not different between the 2 groups (27.0 vs. 26.2%, p = 0.9154). In the IUGR group, abnormal CTG was more common (30.8 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.0214), and foetal blood analysis was done more often (2.5 vs. 0.5%, p = 0.0261). There were more postpartum transfers to the NICU in the IUGR group (40.0 vs. 12.8%, p < 0.0001), too.

Conclusion Induction of labour for foetal growth restriction was not associated with an increased rate of caesarean section.