Download PDF
TumorDiagnostik & Therapie 2019; 40(07): 417-424
DOI: 10.1055/a-0918-3308
Schwerpunkt Mammakarzinom
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Rolle der Sonografie bei der Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms

Alexander Mundinger
,
Werner Bader
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 August 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Mammografie und Sonografie nutzen differente physikalische Prinzipien zur Bilderzeugung. Welche Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom profitieren von einer ergänzenden Sonografie und welche nicht? Gibt es ausreichend wissenschaftliche Evidenz für den Einsatz der Mammasonografie innerhalb eines organisierten Screeningprogramms? Oder stehen wir vor einem Paradigmenwechsel hin zur personalisierten risikoadaptierten Früherkennung?
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S. et al. Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173797 patients. BMJ 2015; 351: h4901
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 www.mammo-programm.de/was-ist-das-mammografie-screening-programm/was-ist-das-mammografie-screening-programm-2/ ; abgerufen am: 07.06.2019
    PubMed
  • 3 Skaane P. How can we reduce unnecessary procedures after screening mammography?. Radiology 2019; 291: 318-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D. International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. et al. Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2353-2358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Früherkennung, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms, Version 4.1, 2018 AWMF Registernummer: 032-045OL. www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/mammakarzinom/ ; abgerufen am: 26.06.2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jahresbericht Qualitätssicherung 2016. Ergebnisse des Deutschen Mammografie-Screening-Programms. Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammografie. Berlin: Oktober 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V. et al. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 781-787
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B. et al. Self-assessed health, perceived stress and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study. Breast 2016; 25: 38-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidrich J. et al. Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2744-2751
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K. et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 1218-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 eu.densebreast-info.org/ ; abgerufen am: 26.06.2019
    PubMed
  • 12 Sickles EA, D’Orsi O. ACR BI-RADS®-follow-up and outcome-monitoring. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rebolj M, Assi V, Brentnall A. et al. Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2018; 118: 1559-1570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP. et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164: 268-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M. et al. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Interval breast cancers at 1year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 1021-1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan strategic anti-cancer randomized trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 341-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Buchberger W, Geiger-Gritsch S, Knapp R. et al. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2018; 101: 24-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Geiger-Gritsch S, Daniaux M, Buchberger W. et al. Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2018; 130: 92-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D. ACRIN 6666 Investigators. et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012; 307: 1394-1404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shen S, Zhou Y, Xu Y. et al. A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: 998-1004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mundinger A, Madjar H. Breast ultrasound update. Up2date 2015; 2: 107-134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chong A, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES. et al. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and clinical practice. Radiology 2019; 292: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vourtsis A, Kachulis A. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1886 women. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 592-601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW. et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology 2015; 274: 663-673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wilczek B, Wilczek HE, Rasouliyan L. et al. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1554-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Maier A, Heil J, Lauer A. et al. Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 571-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zackrisson S, Lång K, Rosso A. et al. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö breast tomosynthesis screening trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1493-1503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pattacini P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P. et al. Digital Mammography versus digital mammography plus tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening: he Reggio Emilia tomosynthesis randomized trial. RETomo working group. Radiology 2018; 288: 375-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G. et al. Adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in mammography-negative dense breasts: Interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1882-1888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R. Comparison of cancers detected by screening ultrasound and digital breast tomosynthesis. Amer Roentgen Ray Soc (ARRS) 2017. Abstract 3162 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vourtsis A, Berg WA. Breast density implications and supplemental screening. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 1762-1777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Phi XA, Saadatmand S, De Bock GH. et al. Contribution of mammography to MRI screening in BRCA mutation carriers by BRCA status and age: individual patient data meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2016; 114: 631-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H. et al. Supplemental breast MR imaging screening of women with average risk of breast cancer. Radiology 2017; 283: 361-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gilbert FJ, Selamoglu A. A personalised screening: is this the way forward?. Clin Radiol 2018; 73: 327-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sun YS, Zhao Z, Yang ZN. et al. Risk factors and preventions of breast cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2017; 13: 1387-1397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 www.brustkrebs-studien.de/ratgeberbrustkrebs_grundlagen_risikofaktoren.php , abgerufen am: 26.6.2019
    PubMed
  • 37 Weigel S, Gerss J, Hense HW. et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e020475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mueller-Schimpfle MP, Brandenbusch VC, Degenhardt F. Zur Problematik der mammografisch dichten Brust – Positionspapier des AK Mamma Sonografie der DEGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 170-175
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar