Int J Sports Med 2019; 40(09): 592-596
DOI: 10.1055/a-0960-9717
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Full-Squat as a Determinant of Performance in CrossFit

Rafael Martínez-Gómez*
1   Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Sports Science, Madrid, Spain
,
Pedro L. Valenzuela*
2   Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
3   Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), Madrid, Spain
,
David Barranco-Gil
1   Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Sports Science, Madrid, Spain
,
Susana Moral-González
1   Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Sports Science, Madrid, Spain
,
Adela García-González
4   Universidad Pontificia Comillas, School of Nursing and Physiotherapy San Juan de Dios, Madrid, Spain
,
Alejandro Lucia
1   Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Sports Science, Madrid, Spain
5   Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted 06 June 2019

Publication Date:
10 July 2019 (online)

Preview

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between CrossFit performance and power and strength variables measured in the full-squat exercise. Twenty male trained subjects (33±7 years) performed an incremental load full-squat test for assessment of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) and the mean (Pmean) and peak (Ppeak) power. Performance in 5 different Workouts of the Day (WODs) was measured on different days, and overall CrossFit performance was determined as the sum of the scores obtained in these WODs. Athletes were then assigned to a high (HP) or low (LP) performance group based on the median score for overall performance. Correlation analysis between squat variables and performance was performed and between-group differences were assessed. Moderate to strong (r=0.47–0.69, p<0.05) positive correlations were found between squat variables and performance in the different WODs. Overall CrossFit performance was strongly and positively associated with absolute (r=0.62, p=0.01) and relative 1RM (r=0.65, p=0.07), and relative Pmean (r=0.56, p=0.02) and Ppeak (r=0.53, p=0.03). Large differences (effect sizes ranging 1.1–1.7, all p<0.05) were observed between HP and LP for absolute and relative 1RM, relative Pmean, and absolute and relative Ppeak. In summary, strength and power indexes measured in a squat test are positively associated with CrossFit performance.

* contributed equally