Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 2: Gaining Information and Clinical Therapeutic RelevanceArticle in several languages: English | deutsch
25 September 2019 (eFirst)
Background Magnetic resonance and computed tomography (MRI, CT) has been known to compare the sensitivity for the detection of pelvic fractures with others. It is unclear whether MRI imaging beyond CT leads to therapy change. The aim of our study is to determine the information gained from MRI in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures and to reduce the effects on the form of therapy.
Patients and Methods In a retrospective, clinical study, 31 patients with pelvic fracture and CT and MRI imaging (median 81 ± 20 years, 22 female and 9 male) were examined. There was a classification according to AO classification for adequate or FFP classification for inadequate fractures. In addition, vascular, muscular, haematomatous and organic concomitant injuries as well as bone marrow edema and additional secondary findings requiring evaluation were evaluated. The type of therapy (conservative vs. surgical) and a possible type of therapy change were documented for each patient. Exact test according to Fisher was tested orienting.
Results Overall, MRI showed a greater fracture rate of pelvic fractures in 29% (n = 9) patients than CT. Four type I fractures according to FFP classification were identified as type II fractures and 4 type II fractures as type IV fractures. One type B1 fracture according to AO classification was found to be C2 fracture on MRI. Fisherʼs Exact Test found that the parameters “adequacy of trauma” and “fracture type change” by MRI were p = 0.38. MRI showed a total of 82 concomitant injuries, CT 31. Overall, MRI gained information in 75% (n = 24) of all patients examined. A change from conservative to operative after MRI took place in 2 patients. No patient was surgically changed from planned surgery to conservative. The extent to which MRI caused changes within one form of therapy (conservative, operative) could not be determined retrospectively. In 18% of patients with an inadequate fracture, however, according to the literature, the treatment regimen would have changed pro forma.
Conclusion In summary, it can be stated that the MRI in our study provided an information gain in the case of adequate and inadequate pelvic fractures as well as their accompanying injuries and that a possible therapeutic relevance of this information gain could be obtained specially at the inadequate fractures showed.
- 1 Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Khurana B. Computed tomography for occult fractures of the proximal femur, pelvis, and sacrum in clinical practice: single institution, dual-site experience. Emerg Radiol 2018; 25: 265-273
- 2 Spiegl UJA, Schnake KJ, Osterhoff G. et al. Radiologische Diagnostik von Stress- und Insuffizienzfrakturen des Sakrums. Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157: 144-153
- 3 Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y. et al. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 995-1001
- 4 Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD. et al. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 201-210
- 5 Matcuk jr. GR, Mahanty SR, Skalski MR. et al. Stress fractures: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, and treatment options. Emerg Radiol 2016; 23: 365-375
- 6 Stuby FM, Schäffler A, Haas T. et al. Insuffizienzfrakturen des Beckenrings. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 351-364
- 7 Ross AB, Chan BY, Yi PH. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip an pelvis fractures in the elderly. Skeletal Radiol 2019; 48: 103-108
- 8 Arduini M, Saturnino L, Piperno A. et al. Fragility fractures of the pelvis: treatment and preliminary results. Aging Clin Exp Res 2015; 27 (Suppl. 01) S61-S67
- 9 Nüchtern JV, Hartel M, Henes FO. et al. Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Injury 2015; 46: 315-319
- 10 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. Hrsg. S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung. AWMF Register-Nr. 012/019, Stand: 07/2016. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/012-019l_S3_Polytrauma_Schwerverletzten-Behandlung_2017-08.pdf Stand: 02.01.2019
- 11 Henes FO, Nüchtern JV, Groth M. et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector Computed Tomography in the detection of pelvis fractures. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 2337-2342
- 12 Carpineta L, Faingold R, Albuquerque PA. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvis and hips in infants, children and adolescents: a pictorial review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2007; 36: 143-152
- 13 Courtier J, Rao AG, Anupindi SA. Advanced imaging techniques in pediatric body MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47: 522-533
- 14 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU). AOTrauma Deutschland (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese). Im Internet: https://dgou.de/gremien/sektionen/osteosynthese-aotrauma Stand: 02.01.2019
- 15 Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 2013; 44: 1733-1744
- 16 Schmitz P, Baumann F, Grechenig S. et al. The cement-augmented transiliacal internal fixator (caTIFI): an innovative surgical technique for stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Injury 2015; 46 (Suppl. 04) S114-S120
- 17 Wagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D. et al. Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015; 41: 349-362
- 18 Schmal H, Froberg L, Larsen M. et al. Evaluation of strategies for the treatment of type B and C pelvic fractures: results from the German Pelvic Injury Register. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B: 973-983
- 19 Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Do we need a separate classification for fragility fractures of the pelvis?. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 (Suppl. 02) S53-S58
- 20 Teli M, de Roeck N, Horwitz MD. et al. Radiographic outcome of vertebral bone bruise associated with fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 541-545
- 21 Hackenbroch C, Riesner HJ, Lang P. et al. Die Dual-Energy-CT als neue Technik zur Diagnostik von Insuffizienzfrakturen des Beckens. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 27-34
- 22 Soles GL, Ferguson TA. Fragility fractures of the pelvis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012; 5: 222-228