Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51(02): 174-177
DOI: 10.1055/a-0983-8240
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bilateraler Reflux – Kontra intravesikale Techniken

Bilateral reflux: contra „intravesical techniques“
Anne-Karoline Ebert
Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 December 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In der Refluxchirurgie dürfen heute auch Operationsentscheidungen individuell getroffen werden. Da nahezu alle offen operativen Implantationstechniken sehr gute und dauerhafte Ergebnisse erreichen und Eltern wenig invasive Verfahren vorziehen, sollte, wenn zur Korrektur eines bilateralen Refluxes intravesikale Techniken eingesetzt werden, deren erhöhte Invasivität gemessen an längeren Operationszeiten, längerer Katheterliegedauer, längerem stationären Aufenthalt und mehr Komplikationen wie Makrohämaturie und Blasentenesmen im Vergleich zu extravesikalen Techniken diskutiert und mit den Eltern besprochen werden.

Abstract

In reflux surgery, decisions on surgical procedures can be made on an individual basis today. Almost all open surgical implantation techniques provide very good, sustainable results, and parents prefer less invasive techniques. Therefore, if intravesical techniques are used to correct bilateral reflux, it should be considered and discussed with the parents that these procedures are associated with increased invasiveness in terms of longer operation times, longer catheter dwell times, a longer inpatient stay and more complications such as macrohaematuria and bladder spams compared with extravesical techniques.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Garcia-Roig M, Travers C, McCracken CE. et al. National Trends in the Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J Urol 2018; 199: 287-293
  • 2 Peters CA, Skoog SJ, Arant Jr BS. et al. Summary of the AUA Guideline on Management of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. J Urol 2010; 184: 1134-1144
  • 3 Tran GN, Bodapati AV, Routh JC. et al. Parental Preference Assessment for Vesicoureteral Reflux Management in Children. J Urol 2017; 197: 957-962
  • 4 Silay MS, Turan T, Kayalı Y. et al. Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (LicheGregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14: 65.e1-65.e4
  • 5 Sriram K, Babu R. Extravesical (modified Gregoir Lich) versus intravesical (Cohen's) ureteric reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children: A single center experience. Indian J Urol 2016; 32: 306-309
  • 6 McCann ME, de Graaff JC, Dorris L. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 664-677
  • 7 Schwentner C, Oswald J, Lunacek A. et al. Lich-Gregoir reimplantation causes less discomfort than Politano-Leadbetter technique: Results of a prospective, randomized, pain scale-oriented study in a pediatric population. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 388-395
  • 8 Riedmiller H, Löser A. Kinderurologie – Antirefluxplastik nach Lich-Gregoir. Aktuelle Urologie 2018; 49: 358-367
  • 9 Lapointe SP, Barrieras D, Leblanc B. et al. Modified Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation: experience of a Canadian center. J Urol. 1998; 159: 1662-1664
  • 10 McAchran SE, Palmer JS. Bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation in toilet trained children: Is 1-day hospitalization without urinary retention possible?. J Urol 2005; 174: 1991-1993
  • 11 Fadil Iturralde JL, Marani J, Contardi JC. et al. Vesicoureteral antireflux surgery with Lich-Gregoir technique without vesical drainage: Long-term results. Actas Urol Esp 2019; DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.003. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 12 Onol FF, Akbas A, Erdem MR. et al. Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation with fixation of ureter during detrusorraphy as a reliable outpatient anti-reflux procedure. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19: 320-324
  • 13 Palmer JS. Extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an outpatient procedure. J Urol 2008; 180: 1828-1831
  • 14 Zaontz MR, Maizels M, Sugar EC. et al. Detrusorrhaphy: extravesical ureteral advancement to correct vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 1987; 138: 947-949
  • 15 Saperston K, Smith J, Putman S. et al. Endoscopic subureteral injection is not less expensive than outpatient open reimplantation for unilateral vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 2008; 180: 1626-1629
  • 16 Suer E, Ozcan C, Mermerkaya M. et al. Can factors affecting complication rates for ureteric re-implantation be predicted? Use of the modified Clavien classification system in a paediatric population. BJU 2014; 114: 595-600
  • 17 Gray SL, Anderson ML, Dublin S. et al. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 401e7
  • 18 Giramonti KM, Kogan BA, Halpern LF. The effects of anticholinergic drugs on attention span and short-term memory skills in children. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27: 315-318
  • 19 Koyle MA, Butt H, Lorenzo A. et al. Prolonged urinary retention can and does occur after any type of ureteral reimplantantion. Pediatr Surg Int 2017; 33: 623-626
  • 20 Minevich E, Aronoff D, Wacksman J. et al. Voiding dysfunction after bilateral extravesical detrusorrhaphy. J Urol. 1998; 160: 1004-1006
  • 21 Barrieras D, Lapointe S, Reddy PP. et al. Urinary retention after bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation: does dissection distal to the ureteral orifice have a role?. J Urol 1999; 162: 1197-1200
  • 22 Leissner J, Allhoff EP, Wolff W. et al. The pelvic plexus and antireflux surgery: topographical findings and clinical consequences. J Urol 2001; 165: 1652-1655
  • 23 Martínez PortilloFJ, Seif C, Braun PM. et al. Risk of detrusor denervation in antireflux surgery demonstrated in a neurophysiological animal model. J Urol 2003; 170: 570-573
  • 24 Esposito C, Varlet F, Riquelme MA. et al. Postoperative bladder dysfunction and outcomes after mis extravesical ureteral reimplantation in children using laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach. Results of a multicentric international survey. BJU Int 2019; DOI: 10.1111/bju.14785. [Epub ahead of print]
  • 25 Lau G, Anderson R, Cartwright P. et al. Unilateral open extravesical ureteral reimplanation with contralateral dextronomer/hyaluronic acid injection performed as an outpatient therapy. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14: 566.e1-566.e5
  • 26 Lusuardi L, Hruby S, Jeschke S. et al. A new technique for retrograde flexible ureteroscopy after Cohen cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation. Urol Int 2011; 87: 260-262
  • 27 Emiliani E, Talso M, Audouin M. et al. Modern flexible ureteroscopy in Cohen cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantations. J Pediatr Urol 2017; 13: 329-331
  • 28 Carrillo Arroyo I, Fuentes Carretero S, Gómez Fraile A. et al. Technical challenges of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux after Cohen reimplantation. Actas Urol Esp 2019; [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.02.004.