Klin Padiatr 2019; 231(06): 320-325
DOI: 10.1055/a-0991-0455
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

iNO Therapy in Patients with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia – Discrepancy between Widespread Use and Therapeutic Effects

iNO Therapie bei Patienten mit angeborener Zwerchfellhernie – Diskrepanz zwischen Anwendungshäufigkeit und therapeutischen Effekten
Kira Herich
1   Department of Neonatology, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Germany
,
Thomas Schaible
1   Department of Neonatology, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Germany
,
Julia Reinhard
1   Department of Neonatology, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Germany
,
Neysan Rafat
1   Department of Neonatology, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Germany
,
Christiane Otto
2   Department of Gynecology, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Germany
,
Rasmus Schleef
3   Department of Political Sciences, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
,
Sylvia Büttner
4   Abteilung für Medizinische Statistik, Biomathematik und Informationsverarbeitung, Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Bettina Lange
5   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 August 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Despite recent studies failing to prove beneficial effects of iNO therapy in patients with CDH, its use is still widespread. The aim of this work was to analyze iNO use in a retrospective cohort focusing on outcome parameters. Patients 378 CDH patients born and treated in Mannheim University Medical Center, Department for Neonatology, between 2010 and 2017 constituted our cohort. Therapy was based on the standardized protocol of the CDH EURO Consortium.

Method General data (sex, birth weight, gestational age etc.) and therapy-related data (duration of iNO application, OI after 60 mins, need for ECMO support etc.) were collected from clinical reports and then conducted using SAS for both mono- and multivariate analyses.

Results Out of 378 newborns with CDH, 265 received iNO (70.1%), of whom 82 (30.9%) showed a significant OI reduction of ≥5 pts after 60 mins (=responders), median OI improved by 1.85 pts overall. Among initial responders iNO, application reduced the need for ECMO support (p=0.0054), increased the time to ECMO initiation (p=0.005) and reduced mortality (p=0.0396).

Discussion A group of 43 patients considerably benefited from iNO and thererfore as they did not need ECMO support. Even though iNO therapy has failed to prove significant beneficial effects for non-responders, the application is still to be considered an essential treatment method in the transitional period of CDH patients.

Conclusions A more critical approach towards iNO application in nonresponders should be promoted. Further extensive multicenter studies on treatment alternatives for CDH-PAH are desirable.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Obwohl aktuelle Studien keinen Beweis für den positiven Nutzen einer iNO-Therapie bei Kindern mit CDH liefern, ist die Anwendung weit verbreitet. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, die iNOAnwendung in einer retrospektiven Kohorte bezüglich verschiedener „outcome“-Parameter zu analysieren.

Patienten Eingeschlossen wurden 378 CDH-Patienten, die zwischen 2010 und 2017 in der Klinik für Neonatologie des Universitätsklinikum Mannheim behandelt wurden. Die Therapie erfolgte anhand des standardisierten Protokolls des CDH EURO Consortium.

Methoden Allgemeine (Geschlecht, Geburtsgewicht, Gestationsalter usw.) und therapiebezogene Daten (Dauer iNO Anwendung, OI n. 60 Min., ECMO-Notwendigkeit usw.) wurden aus Patientenakten akquiriert und mithilfe von SAS verarbeitet (mono- /multivariate Analyse). Ergebnisse Von 378 Neugeborenen mit CDH erhielten 265 iNO (70,1%), von denen 82 (30,9%) nach 60 Min. eine signifikante Erniedrigung des OI um ≥5 Pkt. zeigten (=„responder“). Insgesamt verbesserte sich der mediane OI um 1,85 Pkt. Unter „respondern“ reduzierte die Anwendung von iNO den ECMO-Bedarf (p=0,0054), verlängerte die Zeit bis ECMO-Beginn (p=0,005) und reduzierte die Mortalität (p=0,0396).

Diskussion Eine Gruppe von 43 Patienten profitierte von iNO und musste nicht an die ECMO angeschlossen werden. Obwohl sich keine signifikanten vorteilhaften Effekte bei den „non-respondern“ zeigten, sollte iNO weiterhin als zentraler Behandlungspfeiler während der Stabilisierungsperiode von CDH-Patienten betrachtet werden.

Zusammenfassung Es sollte ein kritischerer Umgang mit dem Einsatz von iNO bei „non-respondern“ angestrebt werden. Weiterreichende multizentrische Studien über Behandlungsalternativen für CDH-PHT sind wünschenswert.

 
  • References

  • 1 (NINOS) TNINOSG. Inhaled nitric oxide and hypoxic respiratory failure in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide Study Group (NINOS). Pediatrics 1997; 99: 838-845
  • 2 Acker SN, Seedorf GJ, Abman SH. et al. Pulmonary artery endothelial cell dysfunction and decreased populations of highly proliferative endothelial cells in experimental congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013; 305: L943-L952
  • 3 Ameis D, Khoshgoo N, Keijzer R. Abnormal lung development in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2017; 26: 123-128
  • 4 Barrington KJ, Finer N, Pennaforte T. et al. Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 1: CD000399
  • 5 Bialkowski A, Moenkemeyer F, Patel N. Intravenous sildenafil in the management of pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25: 171-176
  • 6 Clark RH, Kueser TJ, Walker MW. et al. Low-dose nitric oxide therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Clinical Inhaled Nitric Oxide Research Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 469-474
  • 7 Dupuy PM, Shore SA, Drazen JM. et al. Bronchodilator action of inhaled nitric oxide in guinea pigs. J Clin Invest 1992; 90: 421-428
  • 8 Gien J, Kinsella JP. Management of pulmonary hypertension in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Perinatol 2016; 36 Suppl 2 S28-S31
  • 9 Ichinose F, Roberts Jr. JD, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide: a selective pulmonary vasodilator: current uses and therapeutic potential. Circulation 2004; 109: 3106-3111
  • 10 Kays DW, Islam S, Larson SD. et al. Long-term maturation of congenital diaphragmatic hernia treatment results: toward development of a severity-specific treatment algorithm. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 638-644. discussion 644-635
  • 11 Keijzer R, Liu J, Deimling J. et al. Dual-hit hypothesis explains pulmonary hypoplasia in the nitrofen model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 1299-1306
  • 12 Keijzer R, Puri P. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2010; 19: 180-185
  • 13 Kinsella JP, Ivy DD, Abman SH. Ontogeny of NO activity and response to inhaled NO in the developing ovine pulmonary circulation. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: H1955-H1961
  • 14 Kinsella JP, Parker TA, Galan H. et al. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary edema and lung neutrophil accumulation in severe experimental hyaline membrane disease. Pediatr Res 1997; 41: 457-463
  • 15 Kitagawa M, Hislop A, Boyden EA. et al. Lung hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A quantitative study of airway, artery, and alveolar development. Br J Surg 1971; 58: 342-346
  • 16 Lakshminrusimha S, Keszler M. Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn. Neoreviews 2015; 16: e680-e692
  • 17 Levin DL. Morphologic analysis of the pulmonary vascular bed in congenital left-sided diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 805-809
  • 18 Longoni M, High FA, Qi H. et al. Genome-wide enrichment of damaging de novo variants in patients with isolated and complex congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Hum Genet 2017; 136: 679-691
  • 19 Luong C, Rey-Perra J, Vadivel A. et al. Antenatal sildenafil treatment attenuates pulmonary hypertension in experimental congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Circulation 2011; 123: 2120-2131
  • 20 Macrae DJ, Field D, Mercier JC. et al. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in neonates and children: reaching a European consensus. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 372-380
  • 21 Morini F, Lally PA, Lally KP. et al. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group Registry. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2015; 25: 488-496
  • 22 Mous DS, Buscop-van Kempen MJ, Wijnen RMH. et al. Changes in vasoactive pathways in congenital diaphragmatic hernia associated pulmonary hypertension explain unresponsiveness to pharmacotherapy. Respir Res 2017; 18: 187
  • 23 Mous DS, Kool HM, Buscop-van Kempen MJ. et al. Clinically relevant timing of antenatal sildenafil treatment reduces pulmonary vascular remodeling in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2016; 311: L734-L742
  • 24 Olson E, Lusk LA, Fineman JR. et al. Short-Term Treprostinil Use in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia following Repair. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 762-764
  • 25 Pediatrics AAo. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Use of inhaled nitric oxide. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 344-345
  • 26 Putnam LR, Tsao K, Morini F. et al. Evaluation of Variability in Inhaled Nitric Oxide Use and Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170: 1188-1194
  • 27 Roberts Jr. JD, Chiche JD, Weimann J. et al. Nitric oxide inhalation decreases pulmonary artery remodeling in the injured lungs of rat pups. Circ Res 2000; 87: 140-145
  • 28 Sharma V, Berkelhamer S, Lakshminrusimha S. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2015; 1: 14
  • 29 Snoek KG, Reiss IK, Greenough A. et al. Standardized Postnatal Management of Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Europe: The CDH EURO Consortium Consensus – 2015 Update. Neonatology 2016; 110: 66-74
  • 30 van den Hout L, Reiss I, Felix JF. et al. Risk factors for chronic lung disease and mortality in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Neonatology 2010; 98: 370-380