Rofo 2020; 192(04): 335-342
DOI: 10.1055/a-1012-2143
Technical Innovations
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Atypically Located Osteoid Osteoma: Characteristics and Therapeutic Success After Image-Guided Thermal Ablation

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Ricarda Johanna Seemann
1   Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Germany
,
Sven Märdian
1   Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Germany
,
Philipp Schwabe
2   Department for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Vivantes-Hospital Spandau, Berlin, Germany
,
Florian Streitparth
3   Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, München, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 May 2019

01 September 2019

Publication Date:
20 November 2019 (online)

Abstract

Purpose While ostoeid osteomas (OO) are typically located in long tubular bones, OO occurring elsewhere are referred to as “atypical”. Aim of our study was to review the characteristics of atypically located OO, course of symptoms and therapy, as well as clinical outcome, safety, and patient satisfaction of radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Materials and methods In the period from 04/01 to 07/13, 33 patients were treated using thermal ablation (RFA or laser), partly with low temperature and short duration technique. Clinical records were analyzed. Additionally, 23 patients were interviewed via telephone. Primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success (recurrence rates), and adverse events. Secondary endpoints were course of symptoms and therapy as well as patient satisfaction.

Results Mean follow-up was 22.1 ± 21.5 months. Average patient age was 31.7 ± 16.3 years. Localization: Most atypical OO (61 %) were located in the lower extremity, followed by axial skeleton (26 %) and upper extremity (13 %). Pain anamnesis: 74 % of patients stated that their pain occured predominantly at night and responded to NSAID, as typical for OO. Diagnostics: Patients consulted on average 4 different doctors and in 52 % patients, ≥ 3 different radiologic imaging techniques where used before the diagnosis “OO” was made. Outcome: Technical success of thermal ablation was 100 %. Primary clinical success was 91 %. Patient satisfaction was 100 %. No major complications occurred.

Conclusion In ¼ of cases, atypical OO did not show the typical pain characteristics of OO. Image-guided thermal ablation is a promising and safe therapy also for patients with atypical OO.

Key points:

  • Atypical OO are challenging regarding diagnostics and therapy

  • Image-guided thermal ablation is a safe and effective procedure also for patients with atypical OO

  • Image-guided thermal ablation shows high patient satisfaction

Citation Format

  • Seemann RJ, Märdian S, Schwabe P et al. Atypically Located Osteoid Osteoma: Characteristics and Therapeutic Success After Image-Guided Thermal Ablation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 335 – 342

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Laurence N, Epelman M, Markowitz RI. et al. Osteoid osteomas: a pain in the night diagnosis. Pediatric radiology 2012; 42: 1490-1501 ; quiz 1540–1492. doi:10.1007/s00247-012-2495-y
  • 2 Klein MH, Shankman S. Osteoid osteoma: radiologic and pathologic correlation. Skeletal radiology 1992; 21: 23-31
  • 3 Kransdorf MJ, Stull MA, Gilkey FW. et al. Osteoid osteoma. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1991; 11: 671-696 . doi:10.1148/radiographics.11.4.1887121
  • 4 Assoun J, Richardi G, Railhac JJ. et al. Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 1994; 191: 217-223 . doi:10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134575
  • 5 Liu PT, Kujak JL, Roberts CC. et al. The vascular groove sign: a new CT finding associated with osteoid osteomas. American journal of roentgenology 2011; 196: 168-173 . doi:10.2214/ajr.10.4534
  • 6 Mylona S, Patsoura S, Galani P. et al. Osteoid osteomas in common and in technically challenging locations treated with computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Skeletal radiology 2010; 39: 443-449 . doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0859-7
  • 7 Ciftdemir M, Tuncel SA, Usta U. Atypical osteoid osteomas. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology: orthopedie traumatologie 2015; 25: 17-27 . doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1291-1
  • 8 Hayes CW, Conway WF, Sundaram M. Misleading aggressive MR imaging appearance of some benign musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 1992; 12: 1119-1134 ; discussion 1135-1116. doi:10.1148/radiographics.12.6.1439015
  • 9 Szendroi M, Kollo K, Antal I. et al. Intraarticular osteoid osteoma: clinical features, imaging results, and comparison with extraarticular localization. The Journal of rheumatology 2004; 31: 957-964
  • 10 Fuchs S, Gebauer B, Stelter L. et al. Postinterventional MRI findings following MRI-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteoma. European journal of radiology 2014; 83: 696-702 . doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.018
  • 11 Campanacci M, Ruggieri P, Gasbarrini A. et al. Osteoid osteoma. Direct visual identification and intralesional excision of the nidus with minimal removal of bone. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 1999; 81: 814-820
  • 12 Sluga M, Windhager R, Pfeiffer M. et al. Peripheral osteoid osteoma. Is there still a place for traditional surgery?. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 2002; 84: 249-251
  • 13 Cantwell CP, Obyrne J, Eustace S. Current trends in treatment of osteoid osteoma with an emphasis on radiofrequency ablation. European radiology 2004; 14: 607-617 . doi:10.1007/s00330-003-2171-6
  • 14 Streitparth F, Gebauer B, Melcher I. et al. MR-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteoma in an open high-field system (1.0 T). Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2009; 32: 320-325 . doi:10.1007/s00270-008-9447-9
  • 15 Gebauer B, Collettini F, Bruger C. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas: analgesia and patient satisfaction in long-term follow-up. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2013; 185: 959-966
  • 16 Lindner NJ, Ozaki T, Roedl R. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 2001; 83: 391-396
  • 17 Rimondi E, Mavrogenis AF, Rossi G. et al. Radiofrequency ablation for non-spinal osteoid osteomas in 557 patients. European radiology 2012; 22: 181-188 . doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2240-1
  • 18 Kjar RA, Powell GJ, Schilcht SM. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma: experience with a new treatment. The Medical journal of Australia 2006; 184: 563-565
  • 19 Barei DP, Moreau G, Scarborough MT. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2000; 115-124
  • 20 Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Wolfe MW. et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1998; 80: 815-821
  • 21 Woertler K, Vestring T, Boettner F. et al. Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and follow-up in 47 patients. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 2001; 12: 717-722
  • 22 Chai JW, Hong SH, Choi JY. et al. Radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma: from simple to challenging findings. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2010; 30: 737-749 . doi:10.1148/rg.303095120
  • 23 Bhure U, Roos JE, Strobel K. Osteoid osteoma: multimodality imaging with focus on hybrid imaging. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2019; 46: 1019-1036 . doi:10.1007/s00259-018-4181-2
  • 24 Zieglgänsberger W. Grundlagen der Schmerztherapie. In: U J, T N, Hrsg. Grundlagen spezielle Schmerztherapie. München: Urban und Vogel; 2005: 17-49
  • 25 El-Mowafi H, El-Hawary A, Hegazi M. Intra- and periarticular osteoid osteoma: Percutaneous destruction and alcoholisation. Acta orthopaedica Belgica 2015; 81: 47-51
  • 26 Bing F, Vappou J, de Mathelin M. et al. Targetability of osteoid osteomas and bone metastases by MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU). International journal of hyperthermia: the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group 2018; 35: 471-479 . doi:10.1080/02656736.2018.1508758
  • 27 Tsoumakidou G, Koch G, Caudrelier J. et al. Image-Guided Spinal Ablation: A Review. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2016; 39: 1229-1238 . doi:10.1007/s00270-016-1402-6
  • 28 Rybak LD, Gangi A, Buy X. et al. Thermal ablation of spinal osteoid osteomas close to neural elements: technical considerations. American journal of roentgenology 2010; 195: W293-W298 . doi:10.2214/ajr.10.4192
  • 29 Vanderschueren GM, Obermann WR, Dijkstra SP. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of spinal osteoid osteoma: clinical outcome. Spine 2009; 34: 901-904 . doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181995d39
  • 30 Koch G, Cazzato RL, Gilkison A. et al. Percutaneous Treatments of Benign Bone Tumors. Seminars in interventional radiology 2018; 35: 324-332 . doi:10.1055/s-0038-1673640
  • 31 Maurer MH, Gebauer B, Wieners G. et al. Treatment of osteoid osteoma using CT-guided radiofrequency ablation versus MR-guided laser ablation: a cost comparison. European journal of radiology 2012; 81: e1002-e1006 . doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.010