Ultraschall Med 2020; 41(05): 499-503
DOI: 10.1055/a-1018-1752
Quality Assurance

Updated DEGUM Quality Requirements for the Basic Prenatal Screening Ultrasound Examination (DEGUM Level I) between 18 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks of gestation

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Christiane Kähler
1   Obst Gyn, Practice of prenatal medicine Erfurt, Germany
,
Thomas Schramm
2   Ultrasound, Prenatal Medicine München, Germany
,
Rainer Bald
3   Prenatal Medicine, Klinikum Leverkusen gGmbH, Leverkusen, Germany
,
Ulrich Gembruch
4   Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
Eberhard Merz
5   Center for ultrasound and prenatal medicine, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Karl-Heinz Eichhorn
6   Gynecology and Obstetrics, Practice of prenatal medicine Weimar, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

A precondition for the early detection of fetal abnormalities is the high quality of prenatal basic ultrasound (screening examination). The objective of ultrasound screening is the recognition of abnormal fetal growth and fetal anatomical anomalies. The prenatal detection of fetal abnormalities enables detailed prenatal counselling of parents, improved care at birth and potentially a reduction in morbidity and mortality. In the guidelines for maternity care in Germany (“Mutterschaftsrichtlinien”), the performance of basic ultrasound in pregnancy is not clearly defined. The required image documentation includes a few biometric measurements only. Therefore, adherence to a standard technique and the possibility of audit are limited, thus not necessarily resulting in high screening quality. In this update of the DEGUM quality requirements for level I screening ultrasound examination between 18 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks of gestation, the required parameters, standard planes and required documentation are described in detail. The greater experience of gynecologists in the field of sonographic screening examinations and the use of a modern ultrasound technique allow improvement of the screening quality. This will improve the standard of basic ultrasound screening. Due to the enhanced standard of the DEGUM I examination, more pregnant women may benefit from a detailed ultrasound examination and specialized therapy in DEGUM level II and III centers. The required fetal structures are described in detail. This update of the requirements for level I DEGUM basic ultrasound examination between 18 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks of gestation goes far beyond the guidelines for maternity care in Germany (the “Mutterschaftsrichtlinien”) thereby elevating standards.



Publication History

Received: 08 May 2019

Accepted: 11 September 2019

Article published online:
03 January 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Merz E, Eichhorn KH, von Kaisenberg C. et al. Aktualisierte Qualitätsanforderungen an die weiterführende differenzierte Ultraschalluntersuchung in der pränatalen Diagnostik (=DEGUM-Stufe II) im Zeitraum 18+0 bis 22+6 Schwangerschaftswochen. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 3: 593-596
  • 2 Rempen A, Chaoui R, Häusler M. et al. Quality Requirements for Ultrasound Examination in Early Pregnancy (DEGUM Level I) between 4+0 and 13+6 Weeks of Gestation, Qualitätsanforderungen an die Ultraschalluntersuchung in der Frühschwangerschaft (DEGUM-Stufe I) zwischen 4+0 und 13+6 Schwangerschaftswochen. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 579-583
  • 3 von Kaisenberg C, Chaoui R, Häusler M. et al. Quality Requirements for the early Fetal Ultrasound Assessmentat11–13+6 Weeks of Gestation (DEGUM Levels II and III). Qualitätsanforderungen an die weiterführende differenzierte Ultraschalluntersuchung in der pränatalen Diagnostik (DEGUM-Stufen II und III) im Zeitraum 11–13+6 Schwangerschaftswochen. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 579-583
  • 4 Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses für Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung („Mutterschaftsrichtlinien“) in der Fassung vom 10. Dezember 1985 (veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 60a vom 27. März 1986) zuletzt geändert am 21. April 2016 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 19.07.2016 B5 in Kraft getreten am 20. Juli 2016.
  • 5 Eichhorn KH, Schramm T, Bald R. et al. Qualitätsanforderungen an die DEGUM-Stufe I bei der geburtshilflichen Ultraschalldiagnostik im Zeitraum 19 bis 22 Schwangerschaftswochen, DEGUM Grade I Quality Standards in Obstetric Ultrasound Diagnosis During the 19th – 22nd Week of Pregnancy. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 185-187
  • 6 Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR. Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 631-638
  • 7 Hindryckx A, de Catte L. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital renal and urinary tract malformations. ObGyn 2011; 3: 165-174
  • 8 Van Velzen CL, Haak MC, Reijnders G. et al. Prenatal detection of transposition of the great arteries reduces mortality and morbidity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 320-325
  • 9 Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 686: 349-364
  • 10 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Ultraschallscreening in der Schwangerschaft: Testgüte hinsichtlich der Entwicklungsrate fetaler Anomalien. Abschlussbericht S05–03. IQWiG. Köln; 2008
  • 11 Hansmann M. Nachweis und Ausschluss fetaler Entwicklungsstörungen mittels Ultraschallscreening und gezielter Untersuchung – ein Mehrstufenkonzept. Ultraschall 1981; 2: 206-220
  • 12 Pandipati S, Combs CA, Fishman A. et al. Prospective evaluation of a protocol for using transabdominal ultrasound to screen for short cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 99.e1-13
  • 13 Berg C, Geipel A, Gembruch U. Der Vier-Kammer-Blick in der fetalen Echokardiografie. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 132-157
  • 14 Berg C, Gembruch U, Geipel A. Die Ausflusstrakt-Schnittebenen in der zweidimensionalen fetalen Echokardiografie – Teil I. Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 128-149