Klinische Neurophysiologie im Operationssaal – was den Diagnostiker erwartet

Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die häufig im intraoperativen Neuromonitoring verwendeten Methoden, deren Indikationen und Ausführung, sowie die aktuelle Datenlage zur Evidenz.

Abstract

Methods being used in intraoperative neuromonitoring are presented with their respective specificities in their intraoperative use. Light is shed on indications and the current discussion about evidence is briefly summarized.

Schlüsselwörter

Intraoperatives neurophysiologisches Monitoring - IONM - MEP - SEP

Key words

Intraoperatives neurophysiologisches Monitoring - IONM - MEP - SEP

• Literatur

• 1 Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electric stimulation. Brain 1937; 60: 389-443
• 2 Foerster O, Penfield W. The structural basis of traumatic epilepsy and results of radical operations. Brain 1930; 53: 99-119
• 3 Tamaki TY, Kobayashi T, Hirayama H. et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Jpn J Electroencephalogr Electomyograph 1972; 1: 196
• 4 Moller MB, Moller AR. Loss of auditory function in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Results in 143 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 1985; 63: 17-20
• 5 Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 1993; 32: 219-226
• 6 MacDonald DB, Stigsby B, Al Zayed Z. A comparison between derivation optimization and Cz'-FPz for posterior tibial P37 somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1925-1930
• 7 Seyal M, Emerson RG, Pedley TA. Spinal and early scalp-recorded components of the somatosensory evoked potential following stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 320-330
• 8 Romstock J, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O. et al. Localisation of the sensorimotor cortex during surgery for brain tumours: feasibility and waveform patterns of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 221-229
• 9 Cruccu G, Aminoff MJ, Curio G. et al. Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008; 119: 1705-1719
• 10 Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG. et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 6-11
• 11 Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W. et al. False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 280-286
• 12 Szelenyi A, Kothbauer KF, Deletis V. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 1586-1595
• 13 Hemmer LB, Zeeni C, Bebawy JF. et al. The incidence of unacceptable movement with motor evoked potentials during craniotomy for aneurysm clipping. World Neurosurg 2014; 81: 99-104
• 14 MacDonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput 2006; 20: 347-377
• 15 Patton HD, Amassian VE. Single- and multiple unit analysis of cortical state of pyramidal tract activation. Journal of Neurophysiology 1954; 17: 345-363
• 16 Kothbauer K, Deletis V, Epstein F. Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. (5/1/1998) Im Internet:
• 17 Deletis V, Bueno De Camargo A. Interventional Neurophysiological Mapping during Spinal Cord Procedures. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2001; 77: 25-28
• 18 Yingling CD, Ojemann S, Dodson B. et al. Identification of motor pathways during tumor surgery facilitated by multichannel electromyographic recording. J Neurosurg 1999; 91: 922-927
• 19 Bello L, Riva M, Fava E. et al. Tailoring neurophysiological strategies with clinical context enhances resection and safety and expands indications in gliomas involving motor pathways. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16: 1110-1128
• 20 Ojemann GA, Whitaker HA. Language localization and variability. Brain Lang 1978; 6: 239-260
• 21 Szelenyi A, Bello L, Duffau H. et al. Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. NeurosurgFocus 2010; 28: E7
• 22 Sartorius CJ, Berger MS. Rapid termination of intraoperative stimulation-evoked seizures with application of cold Ringerʼs lactate to the cortex. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998; 88: 349-351
• 23 Joiner EF, Youngerman BE, Hudson TS. et al. Effectiveness of perioperative antiepileptic drug prophylaxis for early and late seizures following oncologic neurosurgery: a meta-analysis. Journal of neurosurgery 2018; 10.3171/2017.10.jns172236: 1-9
• 24 Szelenyi A, Hattingen E, Weidauer S. et al. Intraoperative MEP alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative MRI. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 302-313
• 25 Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C. et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring in supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 1061-1072
• 26 Prell J, Strauss C, Rachinger J. et al. Facial nerve palsy after vestibular schwannoma surgery: dynamic risk-stratification based on continuous EMG-monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 415-421
• 27 Legatt AD, Pedley TA, Emerson RG. et al. Normal brain-stem auditory evoked potentials with abnormal latency-intensity studies in patients with acoustic neuromas. Arch Neurol 1988; 45: 1326-1330
• 28 Zanette G, Carteri A, Cusumano S. Reappearance of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials after surgical treatment of a brain-stem hemorrhage: contributions to the question of wave generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 77: 140-144
• 29 Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou MP. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss – prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 97-104 discussion 104–106
• 30 Pinkerton Jr. JA. EEG as a criterion for shunt need in carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16: 756-761
• 31 Cedzich C, Schramm J, Mengedoht CF. et al. Factors that limit the use of flash visual evoked potentials for surgical monitoring. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1988; 71: 142-145
• 32 Kamada K, Todo T, Morita A. et al. Functional monitoring for visual pathway using real-time visual evoked potentials and optic-radiation tractography. Neurosurgery 2005; 57: 121-127 discussion 121–127
• 33 Sato A. Interpretation of the causes of instability of flash visual evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring and proposal of a recording method for reliable functional monitoring of visual evoked potentials using a light-emitting device. J Neurosurg 2016; 125: 888-897
• 34 Goto T, Tanaka Y, Kodama K. et al. Loss of visual evoked potential following temporary occlusion of the superior hypophyseal artery during aneurysm clip placement surgery. Case report. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 865-867
• 35 Kodama K, Goto T, Sato A. et al. Standard and limitation of intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 643-648
• 36 Khan MH, Smith PN, Balzer JR. et al. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: E105-E113
• 37 Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E. et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 1129-1143; discussion 1129–1143
• 38 Howick J, Cohen BA, McCulloch P. et al. Foundations for evidence-based intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2016; 127: 81-90
• 39 Nuwer MR, Emerson RG, Galloway G. et al. Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials*. J Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 29: 101-108
• 40 Holdefer RN, MacDonald DB, Guo L. et al. An evaluation of motor evoked potential surrogate endpoints during intracranial vascular procedures. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 1717-1725
• 41 Group BDW. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2001; 69: 89-95
• 42 Shiban E, Wunderlich S, Kreiser K. et al. Predictive value of transcranial evoked potentials during mechanical endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: a feasibility study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87: 598-603
• 43 Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Heuschmann PU, Marschall D. et al. Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry: the Erlangen Stroke Project. Stroke 2006; 37: 1179-1183