Back Squat vs. Hip Thrust Resistance-training Programs in
                    Well-trained Women

Matheus Barbalho; Victor Coswig; Daniel Souza; Julio Cerca Serrão; Mário Hebling Campos; Paulo Gentil

doi:10.1055/a-1082-1126

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Table of Contents

Int J Sports Med 2020; 41(05): 306-310
DOI: 10.1055/a-1082-1126

Training & Testing

Back Squat vs. Hip Thrust Resistance-training Programs in Well-trained Women

Matheus Barbalho

¹Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil

,

Victor Coswig

²Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal do Pará - Campus Castanhal, Castanhal, Brazil

,

Daniel Souza

¹Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil

,

Julio Cerca Serrão

³Escola de Educação Física e Esporte, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

,

Mário Hebling Campos

¹Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil

,

Paulo Gentil

¹Faculdade de Educação Física e Dança, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The study compared the effects of back squat (BS) and hip thrust (HT) exercises on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained women. Twenty-two participants were divided in two groups: BS group (n=12, 26.4±1.32 years, 171.8±3.79 cm, and 69.5±4.9 kg) performed the BS exercise and HT group (n=10, 27.5±1.42 years, 170.8±4.4 cm, 67.5±4.7 kg) performed the HT exercise. Training was performed for 12 weeks. Before and after the training period, participants were assessed for quadriceps femoris and gluteus maximus muscle thickness (MT) and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) test on the BS and HT. Both groups significantly increased hip extensors MT and HT 1RM; however, the improvements in BS group were higher than in HT group on quadriceps femoris (12.2% for BS and 2% for HT, P<0.001) and gluteus maximus MT (9.4% for BS and 3.7% for HT, P=0.001) and BS 1 RM (35.9% for BS and 4.3% for HT, P<0.001). BS was more efficient than HT, since it resulted in greater muscle hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris and gluteus maximus, increases in BS 1RM and similar increases in HT.

Key words

strength training - muscle hypertrophy - exercise selection - isolation exercise

Full Text

References

References
1 Gentil P, Arruda A, Souza D. et al. Is there any practical application of meta-analytical results in strength training?. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 8-11
2 American College of Sports Medicine Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
3 Gentil P, Fisher J, Steele J. A review of the acute effects and long-term adaptations of single- and multi-joint exercises during resistance training. Sports Med 2017; 47: 843-855
4 de França HS, Branco PAN, Guedes Junior DP. et al. The effects of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance training program on upper body muscle strength and size in trained men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015; 40: 822-826
5 Barbalho M, Coswig V, Raiol R. et al. Effects of adding single joint exercises to a resistance training programme in trained women. Sports (Basel) 2018; 6: E160
6 Gentil P, Bottaro M. Effects of training attendance on muscle strength of young men after 11 weeks of resistance training. Asian J Sports Med 2013; 4: 101-106
7 Paoli A, Gentil P, Moro T. et al. Resistance training with single vs. multi-joint exercises at equal total load volume: effects on body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscle strength. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 1105
8 Gentil P, Soares S, Bottaro M. Single vs. multi-joint resistance exercises: effects on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Asian J Sports Med 2015; 6: e24057
9 Bottaro M, Veloso J, Wagner D. et al. Resistance training for strength and muscle thickness: Effect of number of sets and muscle group trained. Sci Sport 2011; 26: 259-264
10 Gentil P, Ferreira-Junior JB, Bemben MG. et al. The effects of resistance training on lower and upper body strength gains in young women. IJKSS 2015; 3: 18-23
11 Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ. et al. A comparison of gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis electromyography amplitude in the parallel, full, and front squat variations in resistance-trained females. J Appl Biomech 2015; 31: 452-458
12 Contreras B, Cronin J, Schoenfeld BJ. Barbell hip thrust. Strength Cond J 2011; 33: 58-61
13 Williams MJ, Gibson NV, Sorbie GG. et al. Activation of the gluteus maximus during performance of the back squat, split squat, and barbell hip thrust and the relationship with maximal sprinting. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;
14 Andersen V, Fimland MS, Mo DA. et al. Electromyographic comparison of barbell deadlift, hex bar deadlift, and hip thrust exercises: A cross-over study. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 587-593
15 Vigotsky AD, Beardsley C, Contreras B. et al. Greater electromyographic responses do not imply greater motor unit recruitment and ‘hypertrophic potential’ cannot be inferred. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: e1-e4
16 Flores DF, Gentil P, Brown LE. et al. Dissociated time course of recovery between genders after resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 3039-3044
17 Clark BC, Manini TM, Thé DJ. et al. Gender differences in skeletal muscle fatigability are related to contraction type and EMG spectral compression. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003; 94: 2263-2272
18 Zeller BL, Mccrory JL, Kibler WB. et al. Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 449-456
19 Youdas J, JH H, Hitchcock J. et al. Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps femoris electromyographic activity between men and women during a single-limb squat on both a stable and labile surface. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 105-111
20 Ebben WP. Hamstring activation during lower body resistance training exercises. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2009; 4: 84-96
21 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
22 Gentil P, Bottaro M. Influence of supervision ratio on muscle adaptations to resistance training in nontrained subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 639-643
23 Steele J, Fisher J, Giessing J. et al. Clarity in reporting terminology and definitions of set endpoints in resistance training. Muscle Nerve 2017; 56: 368-374
24 Fisher J, Steele J, Smith D. High- and low-load resistance training: Interpretation and practical application of current research findings. Sports Med 2017; 47: 393-400
25 Fisher J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D. A randomized trial to consider the effect of Romanian deadlift exercise on the development of lumbar extension strength. Phys Ther Sport 2013; 14: 139-145
26 Bloomquist K, Langberg H, Karlsen S. et al. Effect of range of motion in heavy load squatting on muscle and tendon adaptations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013; 113: 2133-2142
27 McMahon G, Morse C, Burden A. et al. Impact of range of motion during ecologically valid resistance training protocols on muscle size, subcutaneous fat, and strength. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 245-255
28 Nosaka K, Sakamoto KEI. Effect of elbow joint angle on the magnitude of muscle damage to the elbow flexors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 22-29
29 Kubo K, Ohgo K, Takeishi R. et al. Effects of isometric training at different knee angles on the muscle-tendon complex in vivo. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16: 159-167
30 Contreras B, Vigotsky AD, Schoenfeld BJ. et al. Effects of a six-week hip thrust vs. front squat resistance training program on performance in adolescent males: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 999-1008
31 Wakahara T, Ema R, Miyamoto N. et al. Inter- and intramuscular differences in training-induced hypertrophy of the quadriceps femoris: Association with muscle activation during the first training session. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2017; 37: 405-412