Assessing the benefits and challenges of video consultations for the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes – A qualitative study among diabetes professionals

Abstract

Background Video consultations are promoted as a tool to effectively supplement paediatric diabetes outpatient care. However, knowledge about attitudes of diabetes professionals towards this new technology is lagging behind. Diabetologists and diabetes nurses participating in a controlled study (the VIDIKI study) with monthly video consultations for children with type 1 diabetes were interviewed about their experience with this type of communication.

Research Design and Methods Guideline-based qualitative interviews with 9 telemedicine experts (7 paediatric diabetologists and 2 diabetes nurses) and 7 paediatric diabetologists who agreed to the telemedical co-treatment of their patients were analysed using qualitative content analysis, in particular inductive category formation.

Results Diabetes experts reported generally positive attitudes towards video consultations. They identified a number of unique benefits of telemedical interventions, including higher frequency of contacts, greater sense of patient´s safety, ability to interact with patients in their own homes, more timely and accurate medical monitoring, and improved data management. Additionally, it was important to the experts to maintain regular face-to-face consultations and to ensure close communication between telemedicine and outpatient clinical experts.

Conclusions Prerequisites for successful video consultations include a comprehensive initial technical training and an agreement on treatment responsibilities of all health care professionals involved in the patient’s care. Under these conditions, the experts reported significant advantages of video consultation in the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes.

Key words

video counseling - telemedicine - qualitative research - diabetologists’ perspectives - continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Publication History

Received: 04 February 2020
Received: 23 March 2020

Accepted: 30 March 2020

Article published online:
07 May 2020

• References

• 1 Marker AM, Monzon AD, Nelson EL. et al. An intervention to reduce hypoglycemia fear in parents of young kids with type 1 diabetes through video-based telemedicine (REDCHiP): trial design, feasibility, and acceptability. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22: 25-33
• 2 Crossen SS, Marcin JP, Qi L. et al. Home visits for children and adolescents with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol & Ther. 2020; 22 (01) 34-41
• 3 Bakhach M, Reid MW, Pyatak EA. et al. Home telemedicine (CoYoT1 Clinic): a novel approach to improve psychosocial outcomes in young adults with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2019; 45: 420-430
• 4 De Guzman KR, Snoswell CL, Taylor ML. et al. A systematic review of pediatric telediabetes service models. Diabetes Technol & Ther 2020; 22: 7
• 5 Frielitz FS, Muller-Godeffroy E, Hubner J. et al. Monthly video-consultation for children with type 1 diabetes using a continuous glucose monitoring system: design of ViDiKi, a multimethod intervention study to evaluate the benefit of telemedicine. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14: 105-111
• 6 Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51: 294-300
• 7 Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. New York, NY: Sage Publication; 2015
• 8 Lyuboslavsky V. Telemedicine and telehealth 2.0. A practical guide for medical providers and patients. Create space independent publishing platform. Germany: Amazon Distribution; 2015
• 9 Bhattacharyya SB. Telemedicine practice home truths. In: Bhattacharyya SB ed. A DIY guide to telemedicine for clinicians. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017: 111-124
• 10 Mayring P. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken (5. Auflage). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz-Studium; 2002
• 11 Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solutions. 2014 https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517 Accessed January 21 2020
• 12 Mayring P, Fenzl T. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur N, Blasius J eds. Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2014: 534-547
• 13 Mayring P, Fenzl T. QCAmap. A software for qualitative content analysis. 2014 https://www.qcamap.org Accessed 7 November 2019
• 14 Fatehi F, Martin-Khan M, Smith AC. et al. Patient satisfaction with video teleconsultation in a virtual diabetes outreach clinic. Diabetes Technol & Ther 2015; 17 (01) 43-48
• 15 Sandberg J, Trief PM, Izquierdo R. et al. A qualitative study of the experiences and satisfaction of direct telemedicine providers in diabetes case management. Telemed J E Health 2009; 15: 742-750
• 16 Orlando JF, Beard M, Kumar S. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 (08) e0221848
• 17 Sturesson L, Groth K. Effects of the digital transformation: qualitative study on the disturbances and limitations of using video visits in outpatient care. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20: e221