Factors Influencing Postoperative Recovery and Time Off Work of Patients with Benign Indications for Surgery – Results of a Prospective Study

Abstract

Objectives The study aimed to answer a number of questions: Which medical, psychological and sociodemographic factors affect the recovery of women after gynecological surgery for benign indications? Does patientsʼ health-related quality of life improve after surgical intervention? How long are patients signed off work postoperatively? How do patients assess their own capacity to work?

Method Study population: All women between the ages of 18 and 67 years who underwent gynecological surgery for benign indications at the Charité Campus Virchow Clinic over a 7-month period were consecutively enrolled in the study. Four standardized patient surveys (the first survey [T0] was carried out in hospital, T1 at 1 week, T2 at 6 weeks and T3 at 7 – 8 months after discharge by telephone interview) were carried out using evaluated questionnaires to record patientsʼ recovery (Recovery Index), quality of life (RAND-36), satisfaction, complications, sociodemographic information and time off work with a medical sick note. Relevant medical and demographic data were also collected. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate statistical tests for descriptive analysis and complex multifactorial statistical procedures to record observations over time.

Results A total of 182 patients were included in this study (participation rate: 70%). Relevant prior operations (p = 0.01), in-hospital (p = 0.004) and postoperative complications (p < 0.001), preoperative psychological wellbeing (p = 0.01), physical functioning (p = 0.005) and postoperative anxiety (p = 0,006) had a significant impact on recovery (Recovery Index) and changed significantly over time (p < 0.001). The invasiveness of the surgery or sociodemographic parameters (including migration background) had no significant effect. Health-related quality of life (measured with the RAND-36 questionnaire) also improved postoperatively. More invasive surgical interventions were associated with longer sick leave times and, to a certain extent, with a poorer evaluation of patientsʼ capacity to work.

Conclusion Recovery after gynecological surgery is a multifactorial process. This survey of a patient population identified psychological and physical factors which influence recovery but did not find significant sociodemographic parameters affecting recovery. Irrespective of these findings, gynecological surgery for benign indications resulted in an improvement in health-related quality of life. Prospective studies need to investigate whether psychological interventions could reduce preoperative fear and thereby improve postoperative recovery.

Key words

gynecological operation - quality of life - recovery

Publication History

Received: 28 January 2020

Accepted after revision: 08 April 2020

Article published online:
14 July 2020

• References/Literatur

• 1 Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. „Rekonvaleszenz“, bereitgestellt durch das Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Online (Stand 24.07.2019): http://www.dwds.de/wb/Rekonvaleszenz
• 2 Allvin R, Berg K, Idvall E. et al. Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2007; 57: 552-558 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04156.x
• 3 Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE. et al. What does it really mean to “recover” from an operation?. Surgery 2014; 155: 211-216 doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.002
• 4 Brolmann HA, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Bruinvels DJ. et al. Can prolonged sick leave after gynecologic surgery be predicted? An observational study in The Netherlands. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2237-2241 doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0287-0
• 5 Clayton M, Verow P. A retrospective study of return to work following surgery. Occup Med (Lond) 2007; 57: 525-531 doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm082
• 6 Evenson M, Payne D, Nygaard I. Recovery at home after major gynecologic surgery: how do our patients fare?. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 780-784 doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb15e
• 7 Naidu M, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Convalescence advice following gynaecological surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32: 556-559 doi:10.3109/01443615.2012.693983
• 8 Moller C, Ottesen M, Kehlet H. et al. [Convalescence recommendations after hysterectomy. A study of opinions among Danish physicians]. Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 163: 7043-7047
• 9 Clayton M, Verow P. Advice given to patients about return to work and driving following surgery. Occup Med (Lond) 2007; 57: 488-491 doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm063
• 10 Johansen P, Al-Khafagi SK, Thostesen LM. et al. [Analysis of need for sick leave after hysterectomy]. Ugeskr Laeger 2008; 170: 1465-1468
• 11 Doll KM, Barber EL, Bensen JT. et al. The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 457.e1-457.e13 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.025
• 12 Persson P, Brynhildsen J, Kjolhede P. Short-term recovery after subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy–a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2010; 117: 469-478 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02468.x
• 13 Wodlin NB, Nilsson L, Kjolhede P. Health-related quality of life and postoperative recovery in fast-track hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 362-368 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01058.x
• 14 Wang XQ, Lambert CE, Lambert VA. Anxiety, depression and coping strategies in post-hysterectomy Chinese women prior to discharge. Int Nurs Rev 2007; 54: 271-279 doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00562.x
• 15 Webb C, Wilson-Barnett J. Self-concept, social support and hysterectomy. Int J Nurs Stud 1983; 20: 97-107
• 16 Bongard S, Kelava A, Aazami GD. et al. Entwicklung der Frankfurter Akkulturationsskala (FRAKK) – Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Frankfurt: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Institut für Psychologie; 2007: 25
• 17 Schenk L, Bau AM, Borde T. et al. [A basic set of indicators for mapping migrant status. Recommendations for epidemiological practice]. Bundesgesundheitsbl 2006; 49: 853-860 doi:10.1007/s00103-006-0018-4
• 18 Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993; 2: 217-227
• 19 Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW. et al. Clinimetric properties of 3 instruments measuring postoperative recovery in a gynecologic surgical population. Surgery 2008; 144: 12-21 doi:10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.027
• 20 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Anema JR, Louwerse MD. et al. Prediction of time to return to work after gynaecological surgery: a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands. BJOG 2014; 121: 487-497 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12494
• 21 Wirtz MA. Hrsg. Dorsch – Lexikon der Psychologie. 19. Aufl.. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2019
• 22 Persson P, Kjolhede P. Factors associated with postoperative recovery after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 140: 108-113 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.03.006
• 23 Brummer TH, Jalkanen J, Fraser J. et al. FINHYST 2006–national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2515-2522 doi:10.1093/humrep/dep229
• 24 Bouwsma EVA, Anema JR, Vonk Noordegraaf A. et al. Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2017; 17: 129 doi:10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8
• 25 Dessources K, Hou JY, Tergas AI. et al. Factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 461-470 doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000623
• 26 Theunissen M, Peters ML, Schepers J. et al. Recovery 3 and 12 months after hysterectomy: epidemiology and predictors of chronic pain, physical functioning, and global surgical recovery. Medicine 2016; 95: e3980 doi:10.1097/md.0000000000003980
• 27 Kagan I, Bar-Tal Y. The effect of preoperative uncertainty and anxiety on short-term recovery after elective arthroplasty. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 576-583 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01968.x
• 28 Theunissen M, Peters ML, Bruce J. et al. Preoperative anxiety and catastrophizing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association with chronic postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain 2012; 28: 819-841 doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824549d6
• 29 Pinto PR, McIntyre T, Nogueira-Silva C. et al. Risk factors for persistent postsurgical pain in women undergoing hysterectomy due to benign causes: a prospective predictive study. J Pain 2012; 13: 1045-1057 doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.014
• 30 Reitsma ML, Vandenkerkhof EG, Johnston SL. et al. Does health-related quality of life improve in women following gynaecological surgery?. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33: 1241-1247
• 31 Einarsson JI, Suzuki Y, Vellinga TT. et al. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 617-621 doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.003
• 32 Lee CF, Wen FH, Lin SS. et al. Changing quality of life in hysterectomized women. J Formos Med Assoc 2009; 108: 414-422 doi:10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60086-3
• 33 Thakar R, Ayers S, Georgakapolou A. et al. Hysterectomy improves quality of life and decreases psychiatric symptoms: a prospective and randomised comparison of total versus subtotal hysterectomy. BJOG 2004; 111: 1115-1120 doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00242.x
• 34 Yang YL, Chao YM, Chen YC. et al. Changes and factors influencing health-related quality of life after hysterectomy in premenopausal women with benign gynecologic conditions. J Formos Med Assoc 2006; 105: 731-742 doi:10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60201-1
• 35 Hussey L, Turner S, Thorley K. et al. Work-related sickness absence as reported by UK general practitioners. Occup Med (Lond) 2012; 62: 105-111 doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr205
• 36 Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 189-198 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a
• 37 Glaser G, Dowdy SC, Peedicayil A. Enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (Suppl. 02) 143-146 doi:10.1002/ijgo.12622
• 38 Muallem MZ, Dimitrova D, Pietzner K. et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways in Gynecologic Oncology. A NOGGO-AGO* survey of 144 Gynecological Departments in Germany. Anticancer Res 2016; 36: 4227-4232
• 39 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Anema JR, van Mechelen W. et al. A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 2014; 121: 1127-1135 discussion 1136 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12661
• 40 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Huirne JA, Pittens CA. et al. eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecological surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e124 doi:10.2196/jmir.1915