Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2020; 129(05): 213-217
DOI: 10.1055/a-1159-6076
Fortbildung
Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sind keramische Implantate praxisreif?

Jörg Rudolf Strub
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 May 2020 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

In den letzten Jahren wünschen sich immer mehr teilbezahnte und zahnlose Patientinnen und Patienten eine metallfreie, festsitzende implantatprothetische Versorgung mit keramischen Implantaten. Gründe dafür sind zum einen die gute Biokompatibilität keramischer Werkstoffe, der gesundheitliche Aspekt, kein Metall im Körper zu haben und die verbesserte Ästhetik der per se weißen Keramikimplantate [1]. Titanimplantate sind in der klinischen Realität allerdings immer noch der Goldstandard, denn deren Überlebens- und Erfolgsraten sind über viele Jahre sehr gut [2], [3]. Bis heute sind sehr wenige klinische Studien mit Langzeitergebnissen zu Keramikimplantaten publiziert worden. Aber es sind bereits viele Keramikimplantatsysteme verschiedener Anbieter, vor allem aus Europa, auf dem Markt erhältlich ([Tab. 1]).
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Osman RB, Swain MV. A critical review of dental materials with emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials 2015; 8: 932-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jung RE, Zembic A, Pietursson BE. et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 2-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pietursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R. et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant- supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 22-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Olmedo D, Tasat DR, Evelson P. et al. Biological response of tissues with macrophagic activity to titanium dioxide. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 84: 1087-1093
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ. et al. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 457-476
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jacobi-Gresser E, Huesker K, Schütt S. Genetic and immunological markers predict titanium implant failure: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 42: 537-543
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jacobi-Gresser E. Pathogenese der Periimplantitis. Dent Implantol 2018; 22: 298-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G. et al. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 823-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Siddiqi A, Payne AGT, De Silva RK. et al. Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration?. Clin Oral Implant Res 2011; 22: 673-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kohal R. Was wissen wir über Implantate aus Zirkonoxid?. Implantologie 2014; 22: 9-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Saulacic N, Erdösi R, Bosshard DD. et al. Acid alkaline etching and sandblasting zirconia implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 16: 313-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chappuis V, Cavusoglu Y, Gruber R. et al. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in the presence of multinucleate giant cells. Clin Implant Dental Relat Res 2016; 18: 686-698
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B. et al. Bone tissue response to surface-modified zirconia implants: A histomorphometric and removal torque study. Clinical Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 13-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bergmann C, Duske K, Nebe JB. et al. Microstructured zirconia surfaces modulate osteogenic marker genes in human primary osteoblasts. J Mater Sci Med 2015; 26: 5350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fischer J, Schott A, Märtin S. Surface microstructuring of zirconia dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 162-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Balmer M, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. et al. Zirconia implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prosthesis: 5-year results of a prospective cohort investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; DOI: 10.1111/clr.13581.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M. et al. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: An animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1262-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Balmer M, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. et al. Zirconia implants as abutments for single crowns and fixed dental prostheses-5 years results of a prospective investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 290-299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Spies BC, Balmer M, Patzelt SB. et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of a zirconia oral implant : Three year results of a prospective cohort investigation. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 1385-1391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Scarano A, Piatelli A, Caputi S. et al. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide discs: An in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 292-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Benic GI, Thoma DS, Sanz Martin I. et al. Guided bone regeneration at zirconia and titanium implants: a pilot histological investigation. Clin Oral Implant Res 2017; 28: 1592-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CHF. et al. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 251-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Thoma DS, Ioannidis A, Cathomen E. et al. Discoloration of the peri-implant mucosa caused by zirconia and titanium implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 36: 39-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Payer M, Heschl A, Koller M. et al. All-ceramic restoration of zirconia two- piece implants- a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 371-376
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS. et al. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1403-1417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Haro Adánez M, Nishihara H, Att W. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcome of zirconia implant-restoration complex. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 397-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pieralli S, Kohal RJ, Jung RE. et al. Clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants. A systematic review. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 1403-1417
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H. et al. Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 135-153
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Borgonovo AE, Censi R, Vavassori V. et al. Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: a four-year clinical and radiological study. Int J Dent 2013; 2013: 463073 doi:10.1155/2013/463073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Grassi FR, Capogreco M, Consonni D. et al. Immediate occlusal loading of one-piece zirconia implants: Five-year radiographic and clinical evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 671-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Roehling S, Woelfler H, Hicklin S. et al. A retrospective clinical study with regards to survival and success rates of zirconia implants up to and after 7 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 545-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lorenz J, Giulini N, Holscher W. et al. Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long-term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 263-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N. et al. Clinical factors influencing removal of the cement excess in implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 17: 771-778
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sancho-Puchades M, Cramer D, Özcan M. et al. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstruction. Clin Oral Implant Res 2017; 28: 1515-1522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC. et al. Cement removal from restoration luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prostet Dent 1997; 78: 43-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A. et al. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Wilson TG. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1388-1392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar