Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1179-2723
Validierung evidenzbasierter Empfehlung im Setting des Rehabilitationssports für Menschen mit Osteoporose-Erkrankung: Die randomisierte, kontrollierte Senioren Fitness- und Präventionsstudie (SEFIP)
Validation of evidence-based recommendations in the setting of rehabilitation sports for people with osteoporosis: The randomised, controlled Senior Fitness and Prevention Study [Senioren Fitness- und Präventionsstudie] (SEFIP)Zusammenfassung
Eine wesentliche Limitation des Rehabilitationssports gemäß § 64 SGB IX ist die fehlende Evidenz seiner Effektivität auf indikationsspezifische Größen. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war es, den Effekt eines 18-monatigen Rehabilitationssport-Programmes (RS-Programm) gemäß § 64 SGB IX auf Frakturgrößen postmenopausaler Frauen zu evaluieren.
246 selbstständig lebende (cdw) Frauen ≥ 65 Jahr wurden randomisiert einer RS-Gruppe (RSG: n = 123) oder aktiven Kontroll-Gruppe (KG: n = 123) zugeteilt. Die RSG absolvierte ein intensitätsorientiertes Training mit maximal 4 Trainingseinheiten/Woche, die KG führte ein niedrig-intensives „Wellnessprogramm“ mit geringem Trainingsvolumen und -häufigkeit durch. Studienendpunkte waren Knochendichte (BMD) und Sturzhäufigkeit.
Signifikante Unterschiede zwischen RSG und KG wurden für die BMD an LWS (TG: 1,8 ± 2.7 % vs. 0,3 ± 3,1%; p = 0,001) und Schenkelhals (DXA: 1,0 ± 3,3 % vs. −1,1 ± 3,3%; p = 0,001) sowie für die Sturzrate (TG: 1,00 ± 1,32 vs. KG: 1,66 ± 1,80; p = 0,002) beobachtet. Unerwünschte Nebeneffekte oder Verletzungen wurden nicht berichtet.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung belegt klar, das RS positive Effekte auf Frakturgrößen von Frauen im höheren Lebensalter ausüben kann.
Abstract
In Germany, the main application of exercise in the secondary and tertiary prevention of fractures is based on group exercises in the framework of ‘Rehabilitationssport’ (RS) or ‘Funktionstraining’ (FT) according to German law (social code (SGB) IX, § 2, § 64). However, there is a lack of evidence that RS/FT significantly affects Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and/or fall rates in older postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis. Thus, the aim of the SEFIP study was to evaluate the effect of a multicomponent RS programme on BMD and fall rate in older women with such risks.
Two-hundred forty-six postmenopausal women (69.1±4.0 years) living independently in the Erlangen/Fürth/Nürnberg area (Germany) were randomly allocated to an 18-month multi-component RS programme with high exercise intensity and moderate exercise volume (RSG, n = 123) or to a low intensity, low frequency programme that focused on well-being (CG, n = 123). Primary study outcome was BMD at lumbar spine and femoral neck and fall rate as determined by the calendar method. Negative binominal regression was used to compare fall rate between the groups. Apart from parameters directly related to fracture risk, we determined other risk factors of advanced age i. e. body composition, Metabolic Syndrome and maximum strength. Further, we addressed health care costs as an experimental study outcome. Intention to treat analysis was applied to analyse data.
Altogether 19 women (RSG: n = 8 vs. CG: n = 11) were lost to follow-up. Overall attendance rate was 76±8 % in the RSG and und 72±9 % in the CG. Significant exercise effects were observed for BMD of the lumbar spine (RSG 1.77%; 95%-CI: 1.26 % to 2.28 % versus CG: 0.33 % 95%-CI: −0.24 % to 0.91%; p<.001), BMD of the femoral neck (RSG: 1.01%; 95%-CI: 0.37 % to 1.65 % vs CG: −1.05 % 95 % CI: −1.70 % to −0.40%; p<.001), and fall rate/person during 18 months (RSG: 1.00; 0.76 to 1.24 vs CG: 1.66; 1.33 to 1.99; p=.002). RSG effects on skeletal muscle mass, body fat, maximum strength of the leg extensors and metabolic syndrome Z-Score were also significant (all p<.001). However, no significant differences (RSG: 2255±2596 versus CG: 2780±331 €; p=.20) were observed for health care costs.
For the first time, the present study clearly determines the favourable effect of a multicomponent exercise programme strictly applied in the framework of Rehabilitationssport with people with osteoporosis on bone mineral density and fall rate in this cohort of older postmenopausal women. Apart from parameters directly related to ‘osteoporosis’, the study provided evidence that a multicomponent RS-programme positively affects body composition, strength and cardiometabolic risk, factors also important for older people. Due to low demand for training materials, rooms, and instructors, this training regimen might serve as a blueprint for the broad implementation of the SEFIP concept in the secondary and tertiary prevention of fractures by means of Rehabilitationssport in Germany.
Publication History
Article published online:
15 July 2020
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
-
Literatur
-
1 Sozialgesetzbuch Neuntes Buch – Rehabilitation und Teilhabe behinderter Menschen – § 64 Ergänzende Leistungen, 2019
- 2 Haussler B, Gothe H, Gol D. et al. Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany–the BoneEVA study. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18 (01) : 77-84
- 3 Lippuner K, von Overbeck J, Perrelet R. et al. Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteporotic fractures in Switzerland. Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7 : 414-425
- 4 BAR. (Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation) Rahmenvereinbarung über den Rehabilitationssport und das Funktionstraining vom 01. Oktober 2003, i. d. F. vom 01. Januar 2011 Frankfurt am Main2011.
- 5 Kemmler W, Stengel V. eds. The role of exercise on fracture reduction and bone strengthening. London: Avademic Press; 2019
- 6 Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Engelke K. et al. Exercise, body composition, and functional ability: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38 (03) : 279-287
- 7 Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Engelke K. et al. Exercise effects on bone mineral density, falls, coronary risk factors, and health care costs in older women: The randomized controlled senior fitness and prevention (SEFIP) study. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (02) : 179-185
- 8 Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Engelke K. et al. Effekte sportlichen Trainings auf gesundheitliche Risikofaktoren und Gesundheitskosten über 65jährigen Frauen. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Sportmedizin 2009; 60 (7-8): 250
- 9 Kemmler W, Von Stengel S, Engelke K. et al. Exercise decreases the risk of metabolic syndrome in elderly females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41 (02) : 297-305
- 10 Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome – a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the international diabetes federation. Diabet Med 2006; 23 (05) : 469-480
- 11 Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K. et al. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the prevention of falls network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (09) : 1618-1622
- 12 Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Houmard JA. et al. Exercise training amount and intensity effects on metabolic syndrome (from studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise). Am J Cardiol 2007; 100 (12) : 1759-1766
- 13 Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D. et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147 (08) : 755-763
- 14 Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D. et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97 (18) : 1837-1847
- 15 Von Stengel S, Löffler V, Kemmler W. Körperliches Training und das 10-Jahres CHD-Risiko bei Frauen über 65 Jahren mit metabolischem Syndrom. Dtsch Z Sportmed 2009; 60 (09) : 281-287
- 16 Howe TE, Shea B, Dawson LJ. et al. Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (07): CD000333. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000333.pub2.
- 17 Marques EA, Mota J, Carvalho J. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Age 2011; 34 (06) : 1493-1515
- 18 Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC. et al. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (04): CD000340. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000340.
- 19 Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ. et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (02): CD007146. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub2.
- 20 Borde R, Hortobagyi T, Granacher U. Dose-response relationships of resistance training in healthy old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2015; 45 (12) : 1693-1720
- 21 Lin GT. Bone resorption of the proximal phalanx after tendon pulley reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Am] 1999; 24 (06) : 1323-1326
- 22 Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM. et al. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004; 59 (01) : 48-61
- 23 Macaluso A, De Vito G. Muscle strength, power and adaptations to resistance training in older people. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91 : 450-472
- 24 Statistisches-Bundesamt. Gesundheitsbericht 2007. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden;. 2007
- 25 Kemmler W, von Stengel S, Kohl M. Exercise frequency and bone mineral density development in exercising postmenopausal osteopenic women. Is there a critical dose of exercise for affecting bone? Results of the Erlangen fitness and osteoporosis prevention study. Bone 2016; 89 : 1-6
- 26 Kemmler W, von Stengel S. Dose-response effect of exercise frequency on bone mineral density in post-menopausal, osteopenic women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014; 24 : 526-534
- 27 Kemmler W, von Stengel S. Exercise frequency, health risk factors, and diseases of the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 (11) : 2046-2053