Schockraummanagement

Zusammenfassung

Der reibungslose Behandlungsablauf schwerverletzter Patienten im Schockraum ist in herausragender Weise abhängig vom Faktor Mensch. Funktionierende Kommunikation, Übersicht über die Situation und effektives Hand-in-Hand-Arbeiten sind Schlüsselfaktoren eines erfolgreichen Schockraummanagements. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, die kritischen Phasen der Patientenanmeldung, -übergabe und -versorgung im Schockraum unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Kommunikation und Organisation zu beleuchten.

Abstract

Human factors are essential for optimal treatment of severely injured patients in the trauma room. Communication, correct assessment of the situation and effective collaboration of all team members are key factors of successful trauma room management. The purpose of this article is to expose and analyze critical phases of patient registration, hand over and treatment in the trauma room. Current literature recommendations for patient and situation handling are reproduced.

Schlüsselwörter

Schockraum - Polytrauma - Übergabe - Schockraummanagement - Kommunikation

Key words

trauma room - polytrauma - patient hand over - trauma room management - communication

• Literatur

• 1 Pape H-C, Lefering R, Butcher N. et al. The definition of polytrauma revisited: An international consensus process and proposal of the new ‘Berlin definition’. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77: 780-786
• 2 Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M. et al. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep 2012; 61: 1-20
• 3 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU). S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung 2017. Im Internet (Stand: 27.03.2021): https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/012-019l_S3_Polytrauma_Schwerverletzten-Behandlung_2017-08.pdf
• 4 Naujoks F, Faul P, Hagebusch P. et al. Auswahl der richtigen Zielklinik – Welcher Patient in welche Klinik?. Notfallmedizin up2date 2019; 14: 47-66
• 5 Commitee On Trauma, Amercian College of Surgeons (ACS). Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. 2014 Im Internet (Stand: 27.04.2021): https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/vrc/resources
• 6 Davis JW, Dirks RC, Sue LP. et al. Attempting to validate the overtriage/undertriage matrix at a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017; 83: 1173-1178
• 7 Beach C. Profiles in patient safety: emergency care transitions. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 364-367
• 8 Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG. et al. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. CMAJ 2003; 169: 1023-1028
• 9 Alvarado K, Lee R, Christoffersen E. et al. Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety. Healthc Q 2006; 9: 75-79
• 10 Manser T, Foster S. Effective handover communication: An overview of research and improvement efforts. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2011; 25: 181-191
• 11 Raeisi A, Rarani MA, Soltani F. Challenges of patient handover process in healthcare services: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot 2019; 8: 173
• 12 Carter AJE, Davis KA, Evans LV. et al. Information loss in emergency medical services handover of trauma patients. Prehosp Emerg Care 2009; 13: 280-285
• 13 Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1994; 101: 343-352
• 14 Zakrison TL, Rosenbloom B, McFarlan A. et al. Lost information during the handover of critically injured trauma patients: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25: 929-936
• 15 Catchpole KR, De Leval MR, Mcewan A. et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Pediatr Anesth 2007; 17: 470-478
• 16 McFetridge B, Gillespie M, Goode D. et al. An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care 2007; 12: 261-269
• 17 Jenkin A, Abelson-Mitchell N, Cooper S. Patient handover: Time for a change?. Accid Emerg Nurs 2007; 15: 141-147
• 18 Trentzsch H, Wölfl C. Übergabe: Schnittstelle zwischen prähospitaler und innerklinischer Versorgung. In: Flohé S, Matthes G, Paffrath T, Trentzsch H, Wölfl C, Hrsg. Schwerverletztenversorgung: Diagnostik und Therapie der ersten 24 Stunden. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018: 41-44
• 19 Borowitz SM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Bass EJ. et al. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 6-10
• 20 Horwitz LI, Meredith T, Schuur JD. et al. Dropping the baton: a qualitative analysis of failures during the transition from emergency department to inpatient care. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53: 701-710.e4
• 21 Meißner A, Hasselhorn H-M, Estryn-Behar M. et al. Nursesʼ perception of shift handovers in Europe? Results from the European Nursesʼ Early Exit Study. J Adv Nurs 2007; 57: 535-542
• 22 Hilbig F, Gries A, Hartwig T. et al. Schnittstelle Notaufnahme: Optimierungen an der Nahtstelle Präklinik/Klinik. Notfallmedizin up2date 2015; 10: 225-239
• 23 Hodgetts TJ, Turner L, Hodgetts TJ. Trauma Rules 2: incorporating military Trauma Rules. 2nd ed.. ed. Malden (Mass.), Oxford: Blackwell Pub; 2006
• 24 Marshall S, Harrison J, Flanagan B. The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 137-140
• 25 Iedema R, Ball C, Daly B. et al. Design and trial of a new ambulance-to-emergency department handover protocol: ‘IMIST-AMBO’. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21: 627-633
• 26 Gräff I, Pin M, Ehlers P. et al. Empfehlungen zum strukturierten Übergabeprozess in der zentralen Notaufnahme: Konsensuspapier von DGINA, DIVI, BAND, BV-AELRD, VDF, AGBF, DBRD, DRK, MHD, JUH, ASB, FALCK, APS, ABNP, DRF, ADAC. Notfall Rettungsmed 2020;
• 27 Wölfl C, Huwer C, Matthes G. et al. Checklisten als Safety-Tool im Schockraum und Operationssaal – ein Gewinn an Sicherheit für Patient und Personal. OP-JOURNAL 2014; 30: 4-6
• 28 Schacher S, Glien P, Kogej M. et al. Strukturierte Übergabeprozesse in der Notaufnahme: Luxus oder Notwendigkeit. Notfall Rettungsmed 2019; 22: 3-8
• 29 Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R. et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1803-1812
• 30 Rall M, Koppenberg J, Hellmann L. et al. Crew Resource Management (CRM) und Human Factors. In: Moecke M, Marung M, Oppermann S. Hrsg. Praxishandbuch Qualitäts- und Risikomanagement im Rettungsdienst: Planung, Umsetzung, Zertifizierung. Berlin: MWV Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2013: 283
• 31 Vioque SM, Kim PK, McMaster J. et al. Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: a 9-year review using the Joint Commissionʼs standardized methodology. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 187-194
• 32 Ummenhofer W, Zürcher M. Crew Resource Management. In: Scholz J, Sefrin P, Böttiger BW. Hrsg. Notfallmedizin. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2013: 558-563
• 33 Gross B, Rusin L, Kiesewetter J. et al. Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e025247
• 34 Rall M, Gaba D, Howard S. et al. Human performance and patient safety. In: Miller RD. Hrsg. Millerʼs anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2009: 93-150
• 35 Bouillon B. Brauchen wir wirklich keinen „trauma leader“ im Schockraum?. Unfallchirurg 2009; 112: 400-401
• 36 Cooper S, Wakelam A. Leadership of resuscitation teams: ‘Lighthouse Leadership’. Resuscitation 1999; 42: 27-45
• 37 Trentzsch H, Wölfl C. Schockraumteam und Teamarbeit. In: Flohé S, Matthes G, Paffrath T. Hrsg. Schwerverletztenversorgung: Diagnostik und Therapie der ersten 24 Stunden. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018
• 38 El-Shafy IA, Delgado J, Akerman M. et al. Closed-loop communication improves task completion in pediatric trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 58-64
• 39 Diaz MCG, Dawson K. Impact of simulation-based closed-loop communication training on medical errors in a pediatric emergency department. Am J Med Qual 2020; 35: 474-478
• 40 Bergs EAG, Rutten FLPA, Tadros T. et al. Communication during trauma resuscitation: do we know what is happening?. Injury 2005; 36: 905-911
• 41 Wölfl C, Kotter J, Trupkovic T. et al. „Trauma room time out“ (TRTO): Neues Sicherheitstool zur Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit und Mitarbeiterzufriedenheit im Schockraum. Unfallchirurg 2014; 117: 83-85
• 42 Rall M, Glavin J, Flin R. The ‘10-seconds-for-10-minutes’ principle Why things go wrong and stopping them getting worse. Bull R Coll Anaesthesists 2008; 51: 2614-2615
• 43 Mahlke L. Initial Assessment und erste Behandlung. In: American College of Surgeon Committee on Trauma. Hrsg. Advanced Trauma Life Support^® (ATLS^®). München: Elsevier Urban & Fischer; 2015: 7-27
• 44 Ferree S, Houwert RM, van Laarhoven JJEM. et al. Tertiary survey in polytrauma patients should be an ongoing process. Injury 2016; 47: 792-796
• 45 Mahlke L. Einleitung – Ziele, Hintergrund und Konzepte des ATLS-Programms. In: American College of Surgeon Committee on Trauma. Hrsg. Advanced Trauma Life Support^® (ATLS^®). München: Elsevier Urban & Fischer; 2015: 1-6
• 46 Huber-Wagner S, Baacke M, Achatz G. Tertiary survey. In: Flohé S, Matthes G, Paffrath T, Trentzsch H, Wölfl C, Hrsg. Schwerverletztenversorgung: Diagnostik und Therapie der ersten 24 Stunden. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018
• 47 Couper K, Perkins GD. Debriefing after resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19: 188-194
• 48 Hale SJ, Parker MJ, Cupido C. et al. Applications of postresuscitation debriefing frameworks in emergency settings: a systematic review. AEM Educ Train 2020; 4: 223-230
• 49 Gilmartin S, Martin L, Kenny S. et al. Promoting hot debriefing in an emergency department. BMJ Open Qual 2020; 9: e000913
• 50 Schmidt M, Haglund K. Debrief in emergency departments to improve compassion fatigue and promote resiliency. J Trauma Nurs 2017; 24: 317-322