Confidence Level and Ability of Medical Students to Identify Abdominal Structures After Integrated Ultrasound Sessions

Abstract

Purpose

Determine the confidence level and ability of first year medical students to identify abdominal structures using a wireless portable ultrasound scanner.

Methods

The students were assessed for their confidence and ability to perform abdominal ultrasound. The 5-point Likert survey included questions on their perception about ultrasound as a resource for learning anatomy, physical examination skills, and the quality of the pre-session instructions. Data was also recorded by the faculty about the students’ ultrasound skills and confidence. Goodman and Kruskal's gamma was used to demonstrate an association between the students’ ability to identify the structures and the self-reported student confidence level.

Results

Most of the students had confidence and were able to identify the liver, kidney, and urinary bladder, while almost half of them needed faculty help them to identify the inferior vena cava and aorta. The spleen and gall bladder were the most difficult to locate even for the very confident students. The perception of supervising faculty was that the confidence level was low in most of the students and only 13–20% of students felt “very confident” about performing ultrasound. Almost 37% needed encouragement and support and almost 10% of the students were not willing to try to locate difficult organs. Some students started locating the ureteric jet and portal vein. Most of the students agreed that ultrasound is an excellent resource for learning anatomy and physical examination skills. All students suggested having more ultrasound sessions.

Conclusion

Most of the students feel confident about performing ultrasound and they perceive that ultrasound can enhance their basic sciences and physical examination skills.

Key words

medical education - anatomy - physical examination skills - ultrasound - curriculum

Publication History

Received: 03 January 2020
Received: 06 June 2020

Accepted: 10 June 2020

Article published online:
22 July 2020

• References

• 1 Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Bell F. et al. The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 9-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2015; 7: 1-15.
• 2 Garcıa de Casasola Sanchez G, Peinado DG, Gollarte AS, Aceituno EM, Vazquez IP, Macho JT. Teaching of clinical ultrasonography to undergraduates: Students as mentors. Rev Clin Esp 2015; 215: 211-216
• 3 Panoulas VasileiosF., Daigeler Anna-Lena, Malaweera AnuraSN. et al. Pocket-size hand-held cardiac ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical examination in the hands of medical students and junior doctors,. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 2013; 14: 323-330
• 4 Coiffier B, Shen PCH, Lee EYP. et al. Introducing point-of-care ultrasound through structured multifaceted ultrasound module in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the University of Hong Kong. Ultrasound 2020; 28: 38-46
• 5 Parks AR, Verheul G, LeBlanc-Duchin D, Atkinson P. Effect of a point-of-care ultrasound protocol on the diagnostic performance of medical learners during simulated cardiorespiratory scenarios. CJEM 2015; 17: 263-269
• 6 Solomon SD, Saldana MD. Point of care ultrasound in medical education- stop listening and look. NEJM 2014; 370: 1083-1085
• 7 Rempell J, Saldana F, DiSalvo D. at al. Pilot Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum at Harvard Medical School: Early Experience. West J Emerg Med 2016; 17: 734-740
• 8 Ma IWY, Steinmetz P, Weerdenburg K. et al. The Canadian Medical Student Ultrasound Curriculum: A Statement From the Canadian Ultrasound Consensus for Undergraduate Medical Education Group. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 10: 1002
• 9 Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Poston MB. et al. An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2011; 3: 1-12
• 10 Bahner DP, Adkins EJ, Hughes D. et al. Integrated medical school ultrasound: Development of an ultrasound vertical curriculum. Crit Ultrasound J 2013; 5: 6
• 11 Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical Student Ultrasound Education. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 271-281
• 12 Nielsen MB, Cantisani V, Sidhu PS. et al. The Use of Handheld Ultrasound Devices – An EFSUMB Position Paper. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40: 30-39
• 13 Bahner DP, Royall NA. Advanced ultrasound training for fourth-year medical students: A novel training program at The Ohio State University College of Medicine. Acad Med 2013; 88: 206-13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c562d
• 14 Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R. et al. EFSUMB statement on medical student education in ultrasound.Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 100-102
• 15 Bahner DP, Goldman E, Way D. et al. The State of Ultrasound Education in U.S. Medical Schools: Results of a National Survey. Academic Medicine 2014; 89: 1681-1686
• 16 Safavi AH, Shi Q, Ding M. et al. Structured, Small-group Hands-on Teaching Sessions Improve Pre-clerk Knowledge and Confidence in Point-of-care Ultrasound Use and Interpretation. Cureus. 2018; 10
• 17 Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R. et al. EFSUMB Statement on Medical Student Education in Ultrasound. Ultrasound Int Open 2016; 2: E2-E7
• 18 Smith JP, Kendall JL, Royer DF. Improved medical student perception of ultrasound using a paired anatomy teaching assistant and clinician teaching model. American Association of Anatomists 2018; 11: 175-184 doi: 10.1002/ase.1722
• 19 Mouratev G, Howe D, Hoppmann R. et al. Teaching medical students ultrasound to measure liver size: Comparison with experienced clinicians using physical examination alone. Teach Learn Med 2013; 25: 84-88
• 20 Kobal SL, Trento L, Baharami S. et al. Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1002-1006
• 21 Udrea DS, Sumnicht A, Lo D. et al. Effects of student-performed point-of-care ultrasound on physician diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 2017; 53: 102-109
• 22 Feilchenfeld Z, Dornan T, Whitehead C. et al. Ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a systematic and critical review. Med Educ 2017; 51: 366-378
• 23 Schoenherr JR, Waechter J, Millington SJ. Subjective awareness of ultrasound expertise development: individual experience as a determinant of overconfidence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 749-65.
• 24 de Vries KD, Brown R, Mazzie J, Jung M, Yao SC, Terzella MJ. Effect of Ultrasonography on Student Learning of Shoulder Anatomy and Landmarks. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2018; 118: 34-39 doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.006
• 25 Singer AD, Younan Y, Saadat V. et al. Performance of an interactive upper extremity peripheral nerve training module among medical students, radiology residents, and fellows: A multi-institutional study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 49: 7-11
• 26 Elhassan M, Gandhi KD, Sandhu C, Hashmi M, Bahl S. Internal medicine residentsʼ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019; 10: 379-386
• 27 Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Bell F. et al. The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 9-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2015; 7: 1-15.
• 28 Am Dinh V, Lakoff D, Hess J, Bahner DP, Hoppmann R, Blaivas M, Pellerito JS, Abuhamad A, Khandelwal S. Medical student core clinical ultrasound milestones a consensus among directors in the United States. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 421-434
• 29 Filler L, Orosco D, Rigdon D. et al. Evaluation of a novel curriculum on point-of-care ultrasound competency and confidence. Emerg Radiol 2020; 27 (01) 37-40