Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2020; 52(03): 197-202
DOI: 10.1055/a-1200-5871
Übersichtsartikel

Drei Top-Indikationen für den Einsatz kieferorthopädischer Minischrauben

Three Top Indications for the Use of Orthodontic Mini Screws
Sebastian Baumgaertel
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Drei kieferorthopädische Probleme werden in der modernen Praxis regelmäßig mit kieferorthopädischen Minischrauben korrigiert. Dieser Artikel erläutert die theoretischen Grundlagen wie die Verankerungsproblematik in der Biomechanik und die Wahl der korrekten Insertionsstelle und erläutert anhand klinischer Beispiele wie Molaren Mesialisierung, Korrektur des frontal offenen Bisses und Distalisierung des Unterkieferzahnbogens einfach, erfolgreich und verlässlich zu erzielen sind.

Abstract

Three orthodontic problems are corrected with the use of orthodontic miniscrews in modern orthodontic practice. This article explains the theoretical basics such as the problem of anchorage in biomechanics, and insertion site selection and uses clinical examples to highlight how molar protraction, open bite closure, and lower arch retraction can be achieved simply, successfully, and predictably.

Schlüsselwörter

Minischrauben - offener Biss - Molaren-Mesialisierung - Intrusion - Distalisation

Key words

Miniscrews - open bite - molar protraction - intrusion - distalization


Publication History

Article published online:
11 September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Baumgaertel S, Razavi MR, Hans MG. Mini-Implant Anchorage for the Orthodontic Practitioner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 621-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 42-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Assessment of infrazygomatic bone depth for mini-screw insertion. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009; 20: 638-642
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baumgaertel S. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant insertion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 104-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Investigation of buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 230-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Baumgaertel S. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 806-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Anatomical assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in Caucasians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baumgaertel S. Pre-drilling of the implant site – is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Asscherickx K, Vande Vannet B, Wehrbein H. et al. Success rate of miniscrews relative to their position to adjacent roots. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 330-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T. et al. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131 (Suppl. 04) 68-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chen YH, Chang HH, Chen YJ. et al. Root contact during insertion of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage increases the failure rate: an animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 99-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Muller TP, Hill IN, Petersen AC. et al. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. JADA 1970; 81: 101-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rølling S, Poulsen S. Agenesis of permanent teeth in 8138 Danish schoolchildren: prevalence and intra-oral distribution according to gender. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009; 19: 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Polder BJ, van’t Hof MA, van der Linden FPGM. et al. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32: 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Meskin LH, Brown LJ. Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in U.S. employed adult and senior populations, 1985-86. J Dent Educ 1988; 52: 686-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kokich VO, Kinzer GA. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: Caninesubstitution. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Baumgaertel S, Jones CL, Unal M. Miniscrew Biomechanics: Guidelines for the Use of Rigid Indirect Anchorage Mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152: 413-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mohammed H, Wafaie K, Rizk MZ. et al. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2018; 19: 36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jónsson T. Orofacial dysfunction, open bite, and myofunctional therapy. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 235-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Park JH, Papademetriou M, Gardiner C. et al. Anterior open bite correction with 2-jaw orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155: 108-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L. et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17: 133-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cunningham SJ, Johal A. Orthognathic correction of dento-facial discrepancies. Br Dent J 2015; 218: 167-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar