Hebamme 2020; 33(05): 12-14
DOI: 10.1055/a-1247-8648
Studienergebnisse
Gelesen & kommentiert

SWEPIS-Studie (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study): Geburtseinleitung in SSW 41 versus in SSW 42 bei risikoarmen Schwangerschaften

Christine Loytved
,
Dorothea Zeeb

Wennerholm UB et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ 2019; 367: l6131



Publication History

Article published online:
30 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Wennerholm UB et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ 2019; 367: l6131.
  • 2 Elden H, Hagberg H, Wessberg A. et al. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 49 . doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9
  • 3 Author response (18. September 2019). Access document: https://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/attachments/bmj-article/pre-pub-history/author_response_18.9.19.pdf. Internet: https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6131/peer-reviewbzw. https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6131/peer-review
  • 4 Bassler D, Montori V. M., Briel M, Glasziou P, & Guyatt G. (2008) Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic. Journal of clinical epidemiology 61 (03) , 241-246.
  • 5 Olsen O. Leserbrief vom 30.1. 2020: Statistical analysis in SWEPIS trial is flawed. Internet: https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6131/rapid-responses